Skip to main content

making faces :: wearing the wrong colours, vol. 1

i've talked about doing this for a while, but i thought now was as good a time as any to get started. i've been writing for some time about seasonal colour analysis and specifically the 12-season sci/art model, based on evaluating colour by hue [warm vs cool], value [light vs dark] and chroma [saturated vs muted]. after a lot of playing around, i've narrowed myself down to a bright season [very high chroma], most likely bright winter [cooler and darker], but possibly bright spring [warmer and lighter]. 

in theory, that means that i should avoid colours that are soft [low in saturation], especially those that have an autumnal [brown, gold] heat to them. bright seasons don't have any of that in them, being a combination of cold, jewel-like winter and warm, fruity spring. so does that mean that those sorts of colours are off-limits to me forever? 

if you answered "yes", i'm assuming this is your first visit here. [which is fine. welcome. i love having new friends. look around, please. but you might as well know from the start that i don't respond well to absolute rules.]

today, i wore a look that should be completely wrong on me. the eye makeup is a combination of rouge bunny rouge "periwinkle cardinal" and "papyrus canary" with the pewter and white gold shades from guerlain's limited "liu" palette. more specifically, i used the white gold shade from liu on the inner part of the lid, "periwinkle cardinal" on the outer lid and then used the pewter shade to blend them. i used "papyrus canary" to soften the colours along the crease to the brow bone and added more of the white gold shade under the eyebrow as a highlight. i used a combination of the pewter and "periwinkle cardinal" along the lower lash line. 

for liner, i've used nars "baalbek" eye paint on the upper lash line and mac "i get no kick" along the lower water line. mascara is yves st. laurent effet faux cils baby doll. 

the cheeks are a combination of nars "torrid", a soft apricot, and guerlain "parure de nuit", a delicate white-coral-pink highlighter. 

finally, the lips are nars audacious lipstick "leslie". i've fallen behind in my audacious lipstick reviews, simply because there's so much new stuff to catch up with, but this is a fairly new acquisition and one that conflicts with everything about my colouring. it sits right on the border between brown and red, giving it a deep, sullen, ruddy look. it sits so perfectly on the red-brown boundary that i can't say with certainty which it is. in photos, it looks redder, but in person, it seems browner, especially in the feeble late autumn light we have now. 



i'm sharing this, because i like this look. i like it despite the fact that the elements aren't in line with my colouration. soft sage green and dirty pewter are anathema to a bright winter complexion that demands clarity and saturation above all. the hot clay colour of "leslie" is a poor choice for anyone who doesn't have a significant contribution from autumn in their colouring. nonetheless, i like this look. 

why? well, i think that there is enough contrast between the eyes and the lip to work. the eyeliner is dark enough to give definition, in combination with the black mascara. the blush/ highlighter combination may be a little warm for my skin, but it definitely gives that soft glow that benefits a spring-touched complexion [as opposed to the molten or lustrous metallic sheen that compliments autumnal colouring]. finally, while the lip colour might be too "hot" or muddled for a bright season complexion, it does have enough contrast with my skin to complement the wintery effect underneath. all seasons in winter's reach benefit from sharp contrast and when that is done right, you have a little more leeway on temperature and clarity. 

so what's the point of knowing your "season" if you can just cheat in whatever colours you want? well, i think it's a matter of knowing how to cheat in the colours you want. if i'd worn this with a bronze and cranberry eye combination, or a dirty orange shade of blush, or if i'd gone with a peachy-gold shade of lipstick, i don't think that i would have liked the results at all. which is a complicated way of saying that knowing the most important things about your personal season can be instructive in figuring out how to incorporate elements that wouldn't normally fall within your limitations. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…

making faces :: chanel's velvet realm

who doesn't love velvet? i know when i was younger, i used to, as george costanza longed to, "drape myself in velvet" and although that phase passed with time, i still think that the plush fabric has to be one of the high points of human achievement, up there with interior heating, advanced medicine and vodka. so to me, it's no surprise that one of the most hotly anticipated launches in the cosmetic world is chanel's new "rouge allure velvet" lipstick line, because even the name immediately makes me want to put it on my lips.

on a more concrete level, chanel describes these lipsticks as "luminous matte", which is sort of like the holy grail for lipstick lovers. we all want those intense, come-hither film noir lips, the sort where young men and sunlight are lost and never heard from again, but historically [including during the making of those films], applying a matte lipstick felt sort of like colouring in your lips with an old crayon that had…