Skip to main content

making faces :: fuchsia fever with armani

oh, you know i love me a good fuchsia. so when i heard that armani had a spring collection called "fuchsia maharajah", i immediately had a conversation with my bank account about the shock it could expect. because when i go to the armani counter without warning, i'm sure the poor account thinks it's dying. as it happens, i ended up doing less damage than i'd initially thought, but due entirely to the fact that not all of the collection appears to have made it to my counters. really, the combination of armani + bold pinks and purples is something that i'm not going to be able to resist.

the collection is inspired by shades of fuchsia used in indian fabric dyes, the bold, saturated shades of cotton and silk, that put europeans in mind of passion, intensity and the exotic. this does continue on the orientalist theme that armani established late last year for their holiday collection, although there isn't any obvious link to southeast asia apart from the name. [the model used for the collection is white and the look she wears has no particular influence from indian makeup trends.]

the collection is very much focused on the lips; it's like the second part of armani's spring collection following the release of the eye tints. there are three "sets" [although each item is sold separately] of colours, featuring a new and limited rouge ecstasy lipstick, a coordinating gloss and a nail polish. the shades are as follows:

"pink blush" : bright, cool pink
"maharajah" : an reddened fuchsia
"garconne fatale" : a deep purple

there's also a shimmery base coat for nails and one new and limited shade of rouge d'armani lipstick, also called "maharajah" [i swear they did that just to confuse their sales associates]. i limited myself [haha] to three lipsticks: the rouge ecstasy shades "maharajah" and "garconne fatale" and the rouge d'armani "maharajah". i thought about the glosses and am still thinking about them, but i'm always questioning how much i'm going to love a gloss, given that i don't wear them a lot. [and while i like the newer armani glosses, i don't love them the way i did the short-lived gloss d'armani formula from 2011.] also, i couldn't find "pink blush" lipstick anywhere, or i imagine that would have come home with me as well.




those who frequent this blog know that the rouge ecstasy is one of my very favourite lipstick formulas. it feels like a light balm that nourishes the lips while providing mostly opaque colour that lasts for hours with a satin-matte finish. they aren't quite as intensely pigmented as the rouge d'armani lipsticks, but they do pack a punch.

both "maharajah" [aka #512] and "garconne fatale" [aka #604] are typical of my past experiences with rouge ecstasy, so as you can imagine, i'm getting a lot of use from them. both are bold colours in different ways, so they aren't going to appeal greatly to those who are shy of a statement lip. [go for the glosses!]

"maharajah" is a red-leaning hot pink that swatches quite sheer, but gives quite the pop of colour applied. i have a feeling this will pull warmer or cooler depending on your skin tone, because there clearly is some sheerness to the formula, but it will be more of a subtle harmonising with the underlying colour- you won't see a huge effect on the final shade.

rouge ecstasy 512 maharajah
there are a lot of fuchsia shades out there, but i didn't have any exact matches. mac "gesina", a limited shade from their first collaboration with marcel wanders, is deeper and redder. i had actually wanted to compare it to mac "catharina", which seems to pull a little warmer, but my tube seems to have gone missing. you can see "catharina" here. ellis faas "l403" is noticeably cooler [and more opaque/ intense on the lips].

l to r :: mac gesina [l.e.], r.e. maharajah, ellis faas l403
"garconne fatale" is a deep purple that leans just a little red, without veering into berry territory. one thing that i find about the rouge ecstasy formula is that the darkest shades don't run terribly dark. there is always a bit of brightness because they aren't fully opaque. so while "garconne fatale" is deep, it isn't what i'd call full-on vamp. it's sort of like a gateway drug for people who are thinking of trying out the super-dark lip.

rouge ecstasy 604 garconne fatale
armani "attitude" is noticeably redder and warmer. mac "spitfire" [limited edition from the wonder woman collection] is greyer and more muted. [i also find that "spitfire" looks heavier when applied, because it is more opaque.]

armani r.e. attitude, r.e. garconne fatale, mac spitfire [l.e.]
the sole rouge d'armani shade included in the collection, the first new rouge d'armani since the fall 2013 collection, "maharajah" [#513, although it is not the same as the previous shade #513 released in the formula] is a bold shade for bold people. it's an incredibly intense red-fuchsia with a find violet-pink shimmer throughout. the shimmer is very subtle when applied and gives more of a cool sheen than anything. the difference in intensity and the cooler shimmer makes it appear different enough on the lips that i think it warrants owning both [obviously -ed.], as long as you like shades of this sort.

rouge d'armani 513 maharajah
"maharajah" rouge ecstasy is a bit softer and pinker and appears quite a bit warmer on the lips. urban decay "jilted" is darker and cooler [both the base and the sheen].

l to r :: r.e. maharajah, rda maharajah, urban decay jilted
i did find that the formula of "maharajah" was different than other rouge d'armani lipsticks i've tried. the texture is noticeably dryer, to the point where it's a little difficult to apply. this is something that happens with very pigmented lipsticks, but i've never had it happen with armani. i was worried, because dry formula often equals drying formula, but that isn't the case here. it actually feels very nice when applied, it's just a little trickier to apply it.

clearly, this is a collection for women [or men] who like a certain type of colour. the glosses offer a lower-wattage alternative in the same family, but they're still very pigmented compared to other glosses. the lipsticks are muscular, almost aggressive shades. "garconne fatale" actually seems to represent the muted end of the collection and it's not exactly what you'd call a soft shade.

here's a quick look at all three lipsticks in action...

rouge ecstasy "maharajah"

 


the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "siberia"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
mac mega metal e/s "tweet me" [peach with pink and gold shimmer]*
mac veluxe pearl e/s "da bling" [warm pink with gold shimmer]
mac satin e/s "hot hot hot" [bold pinky orange]*
mac veluxe pearl e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
illamasqua precision gel e/l [black]
benefit they're real mascara

the cheeks ::
yves st. laurent blush "pepper rose" [dusty mauve-pink]
hourglass ambient lighting blush "ethereal glow" [cool white-pink]

the lips ::
armani rouge ecstasy l/s "maharajah" [bright red fuchsia]

*suggested alternates :: tweet me = mac melon pigment; hot hot hot = mac orange [warmer/ yellower]

rouge ecstasy "garconne fatale"




the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
marc jacobs e/s palette "the punk" [dirty silver, bright orchid purple, deep royal purple]
armani e/s "moon jelly" [cool purple with blue shimmer]
inglot matte e/s "351" [ivory highlight]
illamasqua precision gel e/l [black]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
mac blush "next to skin" [cool beige]*
... i'm fairly certain there's another blush in there, but i forgot to write it down... moving on...

the lips ::
armani rouge ecstasy "garconne fatale" [deep reddened purple]

*suggested alternates :: next to skin = mac strada [lighter] or cubic [darker]

note :: as you can probably tell, this look was photographed on a much cloudier day than the others. as a result, i think it gets the short shrift, because the photos don't do it justice at all. i got impatient waiting for another sunny day and so i decided to post these. i hope it at least gives you an idea of the colour and smooth texture of the lipstick.

rouge d'armani "maharajah"




the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
ellis faas eye light "e301" [sparkly platinum]
armani eye tint "cold copper" [metallic taupe]
mac veluxe pearl e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "perversion" [blackest ever black]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
dior creme blush "pareo" [bold, cool fuchsia]*
hourglass ambient lighting powder "radiant light" [warm amber]
bobbi brown highlight powder "porcelain pearl" [soft white]

the lips ::
rouge d'armani l/s "maharajah" [intense fuchsia with cool shimmer]

*suggested alternates :: pareo = mac azalea [cooler, pinker]

the bottom line? if you think that this looks like your think, then it is. you may have shades similar to the rouge ecstasy lipstick, but i'd honestly recommend them for the formula alone, plus their ability to adapt to individual colouring makes them very easy to wear. the rouge d'armani is more unique, but also a little more finicky to work with. all of the shades are beautiful to behold and will scare away the spring rain clouds in a hurry.

p.s. :: the image above shows decor from an indian wedding. sign me up! 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i agree, smedley [or, smokers totally saved our planet in 1983]

so this conversation happened [via text, so i have evidence and possibly so does the canadian government and the nsa].

dom and i were trying to settle our mutual nerves about tomorrow night's conversion screening, remembering that we've made a fine little film that people should see. which is just about exactly what dom had said when i responded thusly:

me :: i agree smedley. [pauses for a moment] did you get that here?

dom :: no?

me :: the aliens who were looking at earth and then decided it wasn't worth bothering with because people smoked even though it was bad for them?
come to think of it, that might mean that smokers prevented an alien invasion in the seventies.

dom :: what ?!?!?

me :: i've had wine and very little food. [pause] but the alien thing was real. [pause.] well, real on tv.

dom :: please eat something.

of course, i was wrong. the ad in question ran in 1983. this is the part where i would triumphantly embed the ad from youtube, except that the governmen…

making faces :: bette davis lips

the inscription on bette davis' grave reads "she did it the hard way", which should tell you something about the kind of life she led. indeed, she was known as a fighter, taking on studio executives at a time when that simply wasn't done, unless you "never wanted to work in this town again". even when she lost a legal battle against warner brothers that forced her to see out her contract, she was able to parlay her return to the screen into better roles that secured her legacy as one of the greatest icons of the screen. she was the first woman ever to garner ten nominations for best actress at the academy awards and the first woman ever to be president of the academy of motion picture arts and sciences [the people who give out the awards].

that bette davis ever became a movie star, let alone one of the biggest movie stars in the world, is kind of remarkable. after all, she wasn't conventionally beautiful, although her face was certainly unforgettable. …

making faces :: eyes without a face

these are indeed strange times, my friends. no one living has ever seen anything like this because there has never been anything close to the current set of circumstances in the modern world. sure, people will make the comparison with the spanish flu epidemic of 1918-20 but the fact is that things were very different then and those differences are not limited to the technology we now have available. that has an effect, of course, but consider the other factors: the world had just been through the most destructive war in its history. aside from the fact that millions had died, millions returned home injured in body and mind and there was little in the way of a social safety net to protect any of them. in many countries, "peace" was hardly peaceful because the political fallout of the great war plunged many nations into civil wars. so in that way, we're in a better position now because we don't have an entire generation of people walking around who are already severel…