Skip to main content

making faces :: my life as a nudist

as i was reviewing what i've been wearing on my face lately, i made a startling discovery: i've been going nude a lot. yes, i've been wearing clothes and yes, i've been wearing makeup, but, much more than usual, i've been favouring colours that are either neutral/ nude in tone, or qualify as "my lips but better". [i'm never 100% sure what separates those things, because surely a tone described as "nude" should mimic the colour of natural, nude lips, right? not so much.] these sorts of colours aren't necessarily ones that i avoid, but they're ones i find that i generally should avoid, because a lot of them just don't look good on my colouring.

nonetheless, i thought i'd share some of what i've been doing, because the last month has seen me come to terms with the potential of lip shades that area less bold, as something other than a balancing point for a smoky-eyed look. i'm slowly discovering why these are the colours that people turn to every day. doesn't mean i'm giving up on saturated colours, not by a long shot. after all, having gone through over a year of playing around with my amateur take on personal colour analysis, it turns out that those are likely the best shades on me, while nudes and neutrals should come with a giant warning sign over them "may make you look dead, and not in a cool way".

PLEASE MEET ME BEHIND THE BREAK


although they're not the only brand whose nudes i like, i find that nars has a talent for theses shades, so i thought i'd focus on some looks i've done with them lately, especially since i worry that their fine regular lipsticks are being forgotten in the wake of their incredibly [and justifiably] successful audacious lipsticks. 

mayflower




i've reviewed this colour and featured it in a series of posts about my favourite shades for spring, so i'm not left with a lot to say. this is definitely more in the "my lips but better" camp, since it's somewhat close to my lip colour, but a bit warmer. of any of the lipsticks in my collection, it's the one i'm closest to finishing, and no wonder. this is a great softer shade for women who can't pull off softer shades, because it has enough pigment that it will show up, but won't wash you out.

i'm wearing it here with marc jacobs "the mod" eye shadow trio [white, dirty silver and black] and yves st. laurent "rose baby doll" liquid eye liner. clearly, the liner is the star here, because it's really difficult to wear pink eye liner and have it not be the star. i also tried the combination of a cool pink blush [mac "dame"] and a bronzer [guerlain "terra inca", one of the very few bronzers i own], an effect i quite liked.

bilbao




this is one of these shades that i love and that i'm going to continue to wear even though logic dictates it shouldn't work on me. [it's one of my favourite browns.]it's a warm, softly shimmery kind of golden caramel brown. it's muted, light and warm, or, everything that i shouldn't look for in a lipstick. i don't care. i love this colour and, surprisingly, i love it on me. this is why i admire nars' nude shades. there is something about them that just seems to adapt a little better to individual skin tones.

that's nars "dolomites" on the eyes, combined with armani "eccentrico" blush and hourglass "radiant light" powder on the cheeks. none of this should work for me and certainly not together and maybe i'm deceiving myself, but i feel like it does come off rather nicely. [on top of the makeup, the clothes i'm wearing are low-contrast and muted, which are also things that shouldn't work for me. i'm just breaking all the rules.]

pago pago




this was another shade that i featured on my "spring flings" post a few years back. it's on the edge of what i can get away with, because it's light enough that it threatens to drain the colour out of my face. [it looks lighter in the photos than it actually is, though.] i find that it's redeemed by the shimmer, which adds a springtime radiance to both the lips and the look.

i've combined it here with mac's "a novel romance" eye shadow palette, along with estée lauder's limited beauty "sea star" [both a blush and a bronzer] and hourglass "luminous light". i think that this look might have been a little drab on me if i weren't wearing that very bold tomato red, because everything in the makeup, other than the eye liner [another important factor] is soft and muted.

of course, i do like softer colours from other brands as well and in the interests of balance, i thought i'd include a couple of them here.

fawn



when i look for something in the nude family, i think i have different ideas in my head than a lot of people. i absolutely do not want something that's closely matched to the colour of my skin. instead, i want something that is a muted version of something i'd normally wear. for instance, if you dialed down the saturation on something like dior "montmartre" and added a bit of brown-beige, i think the end result would probably look a lot like hourglass "fawn". 

raspberry zincite



it wouldn't be me if i didn't include at least one thing that wasn't available anymore. believe me, i mourn this one every time i look at my tube of this armani gloss, because it's my ultimate natural tone. it is actually very close to the colour of my lips. it's a bit darker, but not by much [unless i apply it quite heavily]. i know i have to save this shade, because i can't replace it, but it's just so easy to wear with anything. i'm going to hang my head for a few minutes now.

ok, i have to admit that a lot of these shades aren't even what most people would consider nudes. if you look at the photo at the top of this post [i have no idea who did this image originally, but i'd love to shake her hand], you'll see that most "nudes" are warm and peachy. but those kinds of shades are almost impossible for me to pull off. in fact, i think they're almost impossible for the majority of people to pull off [although power to you if you're one of them]. so i'll just stick with my slightly deeper, often pinker definition of a nude shade, because that's what works for me. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

real americans

recently in my genealogical research, i encountered something that i never anticipated: americans.

i knew that some of my grandfather's family had emigrated to pennsylvania in the early part of the twentieth century and that my father has even in recent years gone to visit some cousins in the northeast [they were big bernie sanders supporters, apparently] but that was, as far as i knew, my only connection to our southern neighbour.

but it turns out, that's far from the case. one of my british relatives who abandoned the old country in favour of life in the colonies landed in the united states and shortly after was married to a woman with an obviously dutch name. i assumed that they had met on the boat on the way over because, as far as i knew, he moved up to canada right away. but she was actually american-born, the daughter of a dutchman from boston and an established english family. when i say "established", i don't mean that they were members of the genteel cl…

filthy lucre

donald trump has shown utter indifference to the possible torture and killing of an american-based journalist jamal khashoggi by saudi arabian security forces acting on the direction of saudi crown prince mohammed bin salman but that's hardly a surprise. he said on the campaign trail that he loved the saudis because they gave him money. he refused to consider placing saudis on his infamous "muslim travel ban" list, despite the fact that saudi arabia is the one country that has been credibly linked to the september 11 terrorist attacks. or that the saudis' particular brand of fundamentalist islam has been described as the root of the extremism espoused by groups like al-qaeda and isis.

trump likes wealthy people and the saudi royals are the blueprint of the type of wealthy people he likes. they spend and live in lavish excess. family members are like catnip for the international celebrity press, even if the news media [like khashoggi] are perceived as enemies of the …

making faces :: written in the stars, in lipstick [part two]

it's the middle of september already? i'm not prepared for that? i mean, i am prepared for it because the heat this summer has been murder on me and i've been begging for a reprieve for months but i'm still bowled over by the speed at which time passes. this year, i've been measuring time through the launches of bite beauty's astrology collection, which arrives like the full moon once a month. [the full moon arrives every four weeks, which is less than any month except february -ed.] earlier this year, i took a look at the first four launches of the collection and already it's time to catch up with four more.

the most important thing for you to know is that after several months of problems, bite and sephora appear to have sorted out their inventory planning. for the last several releases, information has been clear and reliable as to when and where each lipstick will be available [pre-orders taken for a couple of days on bite's own website and a general…