Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: sex and the single narcissist

in the last week, we here in canada have been treated subjected to a rather sordid tale about a well-known [and in some quarters well-liked] radio personality with our national broadcaster. jian ghomeshi has been an active and very visible part of the canadian media scene for years, focused on the entertainment world and an important part of the cbc's increasingly desperate outreach to a younger demographic. a giant portrait of his handsome face adorned the lobby of the broadcaster's flashy toronto headquarters until this week, so it didn't take much to know that something serious was up when the cbc issued a terse statement saying that ghomeshi had taken a leave of absence to deal with "personal issues". ah, how fondly i remember those innocent days...

our most famous prime minister once said that "the state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation", something that we're very fond of quoting. but i'd like to update that to add that the nation has no place in the bedrooms of the rest of the nation and we're not especially happy when its foisted on us. we've all been witness this week to a meltdown of rather epic proportions, replete with more details than anyone ever wanted that has taken us through the gamut of emotions from "this has a meretricious appeal" to "this is getting seedy" to "this is very troubling" to "this is gross and i want it to stop".

after the cbc's announcement, ghomeshi made what i thought was a well-constructed attempt to set the narrative of his dismissal in his own terms. he accused the cbc of firing him because he enjoyed and engaged in bdsm sexual acts with other consenting adults, basically casting the cbc as uptight and hopelessly conservative bureaucrats [not a hard sell for a lot of canadians] who just didn't understand the multifaceted nature of contemporary sexuality. he claimed that his employers had been duped by a vindictive ex-girlfriend who had worked with a reporter [who himself had an axe to grind with ghomeshi] to persuade a number of women to claim that he had assaulted them and been violent towards them without their consent. he had been the victim of a conspiracy of malicious, conniving people. his statement, posted on his facebook page, was very well-written and a lot of people rallied around him, decrying the cbc for their intrusion into his personal life; after all, no charges had been brought by any of his supposed victims! they condemned the rush to judgment on the part of the cbc, who clearly didn't understand ghomeshi's side of the story, willfully ignoring the fact that the public had only heard ghomeshi's side of the story to that point. [i'll admit that i did judge pretty quickly: it's very common for sexual assaults to go unreported and i knew it was incomprehensible that the cbc would take such a drastic measure against their golden boy unless they truly felt that they had no option.]

that soon changed and ever since then, there has been an avalanche of awfulness, with at least ten women coming forward with stories of being assaulted by the radio personality, none of whom had reported the assaults to police, largely because they feared retribution. many of his victims were in the media industry and had reason to worry that coming out against a popular fixture in the landscape could end their career. furthermore, journalist carla ciconne was viciously bullied and threatened after writing a piece about going on a date with ghomeshi [she used a false name, but many were able to divine who she was talking about] a year earlier where he groped at her against her objections and behaved generally like a boor.

as story after story has come out, it begs the question why he chose to release the floodgates himself, creating a story about his sex life that was so easily and thoroughly rejected by past partners. this, ladies and gentlemen, is where i think that the mental health issue comes to bear.

i've already written about the evil twins of narcissistic and histrionic personality disorder in regards to child molester jerry sandusky. while i'm far from an expert and, of course, have never met the subject, i'd posit that it would be worth investigating whether or not jian ghomeshi suffers from the former. here's a list of the defining symptoms:

  • expects to be recognized as superior and special, without superior accomplishments
  • expects constant attention, admiration and positive reinforcement from others
  • envies others and believes others envy him/her
  • is preoccupied with thoughts and fantasies of great success, enormous attractiveness, power, intelligence
  • is arrogant in attitudes and behavior
  • has expectations of special treatment that are unrealistic
see a full description here

it's relatively easy to see any kind of celebrities as narcissistic, simply because we hear them talk about themselves more than others and we equate their being in the spotlight with yearning for the spotlight. however, the reports of ghomeshi's behaviour towards women do have an eerie consistency that definitely point to him believing that he expected to be treated well despite doing things that ranged from crass to outright illegal. and several of the reports indicate that he acted with impunity, failing how anyone could object, which is surely a sign of extreme arrogance. however, you don't have to look to his alleged victims to see warning signs. you can look at what he says himself.

first of all, there is the assertion that he was the victim of an orchestrated campaign of jealous and resentful people. that immediate focus on the self and the belief that others were likewise focused on him gives an idea of how he views the world. more troubling, his insistence off the bat that everything in which he engaged was consensual, while not surprising, indicates that he may not even believe that he's done anything wrong. narcissists lack empathy towards others because they are incapable of seeing others as being the same as they are- others are always inferior.in an attempt to prove his innocence, he showed his bosses at the cbc videos of past sexual encounters, something he clearly felt entitled to do without taking into account how sharing these videos might affect his former partners. [note: he does not expressly state that he handed over the videos without his partners' permission, nor does he say that he had their permission. i guess it's not about them.]

ghomeshi has been open about the fact that he has had issues in the past: he's suffered from panic attacks and was diagnosed with anxiety disorder. he's described himself as "neurotic", which isn't a diagnosis, but clearly indicates that his mind was not at ease and he was, to some extent aware that it was a problem. neither of those things are necessarily indicative of a further underlying condition, but it is common for mental disorders to exist in multiples, something that adds an extra layer of complexity to treating them.

of course, having a mental disorder [if he does have one] is not a "get out of jail free" card [and since toronto police have opened an investigation into him, jail is actually a possibility]. it does not excuse the damage he is alleged to have inflicted. but finding out whether or not he does and getting him the appropriate treatment would at least help prevent him from falling back on past behaviours once the current firestorm has died down.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

presidenting is hard :: nato

oh donald, i've been slacking on my promise to help you out with your duties as president. [yes, you may take a moment to giggle at the word "duties". but make it quick.]

it's not because i think you don't need the support; you are every bit as ignorant and inept as i'd feared/ expected and the erstwhile presence of "adults in the room" hasn't made you any better. it's just as well that you've dispatched of them. you weren't listening to what they said 95% of the time and on those few occasions when you did try to listen, you didn't understand what they were saying. increasingly, we're getting to see you for the complete intellectual non-entity you are and to see how someone who knows nothing about history, geography, culture or military tactics addresses the challenges of foreign policy.

the latest development on that front is that i've heard that you're planning on leaving nato. we all know that you've never be…

making faces :: written in the stars, in lipstick [part three]

and lo the earth has completed another journey 'round the sun, passing through all of the signs of the zodiac. well, in lipstick terms, it won't have completed its journey until later this month when it moves from capricorn to aquarius, which is where bite beauty chose to start its turn of the wheel last year. i still feel a little unnerved that they followed the calendar rather than the astrological year [which would have meant starting their astrology collection in march with the sign of aries] but i suspect that that's because their financials also follow the calendar.

after some truly infuriating times early in the calendar and collection year, bite was able to get their inventory issues sorted, which means that all four of the lipsticks reviewed here are still available through bite's website, sephora, or both. hallelujah.

i have some thoughts on the overall collection that i'll share afterwards, but let's just get started on the final four shades of the …

making faces :: written in the stars, in lipstick [part two]

it's the middle of september already? i'm not prepared for that? i mean, i am prepared for it because the heat this summer has been murder on me and i've been begging for a reprieve for months but i'm still bowled over by the speed at which time passes. this year, i've been measuring time through the launches of bite beauty's astrology collection, which arrives like the full moon once a month. [the full moon arrives every four weeks, which is less than any month except february -ed.] earlier this year, i took a look at the first four launches of the collection and already it's time to catch up with four more.

the most important thing for you to know is that after several months of problems, bite and sephora appear to have sorted out their inventory planning. for the last several releases, information has been clear and reliable as to when and where each lipstick will be available [pre-orders taken for a couple of days on bite's own website and a general…