Skip to main content

ur doin it wrong. and so am i.

i saw this infographic on common grammatical mistakes which writers should be careful not to make on their blogs. i'm pretty sure i've made all of them at one point or another, despite my criticisms of others' grammatical failings.

10 Common Blog Writing Mistakes (Infographic)
Source: www.grammarcheck.net

i do find that some of the rules here could be better explained: the difference between cumulative and coordinate adjectives is not immediately obvious from their examples. also, there's a much clearer way to illustrate when to use "me and "i", that an english-teaching friend of mine taught me; if you're unsure what to do, take the other person out of the sentence and see how it sounds. observe:

i like it when friends come over to visit dom and i/ me.
i like it when friends come over to visit i.
i like it when friends come over to visit me.

this is what they're saying in the infographic, but it's not abundantly clear. at least, to me it isn't. [note: that was actually a sentence fragment.]

i do strongly believe that it's important to know this kind of stuff [theses kinds of things?] and not to rely exclusively on spelling or grammar checks. neither of those tools is capable of discerning the subtleties of your writing and can inadvertently end up giving you terrible advice. for instance, there is nothing grammatically wrong with the following sentence:

the sun shone from his behind.

however, the above sentence does not mean "the sun shone from behind him".

likewise, there is nothing grammatically wrong with saying:

let's eat kids.

no grammar check will alert you that you're doing something wrong by writing that sentence. the police, however, may have something to say to you unless you protect yourself with a comma:

let's eat, kids.

hope that makes the consequences of trusting in your grammar check adequately clear.

i'm far from perfect and on this blog, i'm farther from perfect than usual. i don't always check things before i post them and it bugs me when i find unforgivably stupid mistakes, which i do, more often than i'd like to admit. sometimes, of course, i employ grammatical mistakes and spelling mistakes for effect [witness the title of this post], but i like to think that i come off as intelligent enough most of the time that you all know i'm joking. if i'm wrong about that, perhaps you could keep it to yourself, as it's one of the central threads of my self-image.

to all of you fellow writers out there: english is kind of a bastard, but i do think it's worth trying to improve, even if you [like me] are never going to get it completely right. either that, or we should all just write in lolspeak from now on.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…

making faces :: chanel's velvet realm

who doesn't love velvet? i know when i was younger, i used to, as george costanza longed to, "drape myself in velvet" and although that phase passed with time, i still think that the plush fabric has to be one of the high points of human achievement, up there with interior heating, advanced medicine and vodka. so to me, it's no surprise that one of the most hotly anticipated launches in the cosmetic world is chanel's new "rouge allure velvet" lipstick line, because even the name immediately makes me want to put it on my lips.

on a more concrete level, chanel describes these lipsticks as "luminous matte", which is sort of like the holy grail for lipstick lovers. we all want those intense, come-hither film noir lips, the sort where young men and sunlight are lost and never heard from again, but historically [including during the making of those films], applying a matte lipstick felt sort of like colouring in your lips with an old crayon that had…