Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: there's an app for that

you mean there's an app to cure my crazy? well, no. but there are lots of apps available for those who are concerned about their mental well-being and so i've decided to take a look at some of them for mhm. after all, visits to your doctor and/ or psychiatric professional can be pretty few and far between. you need something to help you during the days, weeks and months in between.

because i'm an iphone user, i can only guarantee that the apps i look at are available for that platform, but i think that developers are now taking into consideration the needs of android and blackberry customers. if you have any experiences you'd like to share, comments are highly encouraged.

first off, by way of introduction, i wanted to give my own thoughts on what mental health apps can do. clearly, they are no substitute for professional help. but can they still be helpful? i think so. many seem to offer an orderly, well-structured way to track progress [or the lack of it] with mental illness. simplifying this process for people whose condition can cause them to be forgetful, erratic and inconsistent is a phenomenal idea. some apps connect the user to support groups, which offers a level of convenience greater than that of chat forums, because it is designed for mobile technology. others offer assistance with adjunct activities- relaxation, breathing exercises, etc- that can help control anxiety and depression. all of these are very useful, especially for the most prevalent mental illnesses.

of course, there are charlatans. i'm wary of anything that purports to "cure" a mental illness and i would insist that anything that offers help in treating these conditions be able to furnish credentials that show it is based on a method that has been independently tested.

you may want to have a look at psych central's list of best apps. all of these have been professionally vetted. the unfortunate part is that almost all of them cost money. there aren't even free versions available for a user to try. you might argue that if a person can afford a smart phone and data plan to begin with, a few bucks for an app isn't that big a deal and that's probably right. but for the purposes of testing them out, i'd at least like to look at what's out there for cheapskates like me before i start dishing out cash money.

the app i've chosen to review first, is simply called "psych drugs". there's a free version and a paid version [$2.99usd cost] which doesn't have ads. it's a straightforward guide to psychiatric drugs, as you might have guessed, for those who might be curious about what they're being given or what options might be open to them.

each listing gives brand and generic names, indications, drug type, maximum dosage for adults and children and side effects. you can create a "favourites" list, which for most people is probably going to be a list of what they've been prescribed. 

pros ::

there are a lot of drugs listed. i tried "fooling" it by searching out older or less often prescribed drugs, but there wasn't one that it didn't have. it does not list drugs that have not been approved for treating mental disorders, but that's pretty understandable.

all drugs are listed by both their brand and generic names, so you can search either. this is a godsend, because having to remember two names for every drug you take or want to look up is confusing as hell.

presentation is incredibly uniform and very straightforward. you don't have to read through a lot of text to find out what you want to know.

cons ::

the search function only works alphabetically. being able to search by drug type, so you could see what options were available as alternates for something you're currently taking. it would also make the app more user-friendly for people who don't know much about the field. to properly search, you need to know some names, so this could never be a starting point. 

there's no distinction made in the "side effects" section of which ones are common versus which ones are rare. without this, the side effects for everything look kind of horrifying. it would be helpful to know what you can expect versus what is a remote possibility.

when i tried tapping the side bar to zoom to a specific letter, 4 times out of 5, it didn't work. i had to scroll to the letter i wanted. it's possible that this is just me, but i'm using a phone that's about two weeks old, so it's not like there's likely to have been a lot of wear and tear that could be causing issues. 

not exactly a con per se, but there's little incentive to shell out for the paid version. the only difference seems to be that the paid version doesn't have ads, but the ads that appear in the free version are limited to the upper part of the screen and are quite unobtrusive. i think that the paid version could command a higher price if it offered things like the ability to compare drugs, the possibility of tracking your own progress and side effects on a specific drug or more advanced search options.

bottom line :: if you know a little bit about psychiatric drugs and are curious to know more, this is a decent basic app. it gives you the basics on a comprehensive list of drugs and will let you know what exactly has been prescribed to you. it'll also let you know all the things that could happen to you from taking these drugs. it's not going to provide much more than the basics, but for a free app, the price is right.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

eat the cup, 2018, part one :: open up and say 'da'

as always at the beginning of the world cup tournament, i spend my first couple of days trying to decide which country to feature first. i had pretty much made up my mind that i would follow last cup's example and honour the hosts first off, but then i decided that it would be even more fun to come up with a meal that combined the cuisines of both teams in the first game.

of course, that would mean accepting that there were two teams on the pitch in the first game and i think some fans would say that was arguable. no one expected much of saudi arabia, to be fair. but no one expected a lot from russia, so having the hosts welcome everyone by stampeding over their first opposition like a herd of rabid camels was, to say the least, unexpected. their 5-0 mauling of the saudis gave produced a new hero, denis cheryshev, a man who didn't even rate inclusion in the "panini" sticker booklets that fifa produces, and the first meme of the tournament when russian president vlad…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [summer edition]

this may seem like an odd time to think about summer, but not to think about coolness. it can be hard to wrap your head around the idea that summer is considered "cool" in colour analysis terms and, in my opinion, reads as the coolest of the cool, because everything in it is touched with the same chilly grey. winter may have the coldest colours, but its palette is so vivid that it distracts the eye. everything in summer is fresh and misty, like the morning sky before the sun breaks through. in my original post on the season, i compared it to monet's paintings of waterlilies at his garden in giverny and, if i do say so, i think that's an apt characterisation.

finding lip colours touched with summer grey and blue is, as you might expect, kind of tricky. the cosmetic world seems obsessed with bringing warmth, which doesn't recognise that some complexions don't support it well. [also, different complexions support different kinds of warmth, but that's another…

armchair centre back :: the end is near

hard to believe it's been a month since the euro final tournament kicked off. tomorrow, we have the final showdown between france and portugal. [excuse me, i have to suppress bile every time i say that last bit.] so there's no doubt who i'll be supporting tomorrow. i do find it odd that, after a competition that has seen many, many shocks, the team that was the bookmakers' favourite to win the cup does look likely to do so. as far as dom's picks and mine? we need to sharpen our game a little... here's how we fared:

winner :: tbd

we said :: germany. we both said germany. i did, however, say that germany was vulnerable to their own complacency, and i would say that that was a factor in their final game against france. having beaten them with relative ease in the world cup two years ago, perhaps germany felt they could turn in a solid, but not brilliant performance. and that's what they did. unfortunately for them, france did turn in a brilliant performance.

&q…