Skip to main content

making faces :: cheeky!

here's a quick post for you about one of my cosmetic experiments. i am by no means a professional, but i have assembled my own little laboratory...


[un]fortunately, i don't have an assistant to use as a guinea pig subject, so i have to work on myself. this is how tesla got started, i'm certain.

most makeup looks focus on whether to put the emphasis on the eyes or the lips, but i started to wonder: what if i lead with my cheeks? not those cheeks, perverts! [please never change, though.] rather than making the boldest element of a look my eyes or my lips, i thought that it would be fun to have blush be the star and the eyes and lips more supporting players. 


now, while i love bright blushes and doll cheeks, i realised that i couldn't just apply a bright blush and go with nudes everywhere else. even i know that would be silly. [or do i?] so what i decided to do was use a more natural shade, but build up the application so that it was a bit more prominent. and rather than go really light on the eyes and lips, i decided to go more mid-range. 

and here's what happened...



well, it's not exactly earth-shattering, but it is different, at least for me. you could easily react by saying "you're wearing too much blush", but it does sort of give a very wind-kissed "i've been out traipsing across the moors" kind of look, i think. the shades i used were rouge bunny rouge "gracilis", applied in layers for more impact. i swept hourglass "mood light" over it to give a bit more glow and a slightly warmer tone. 

for the eyes, the shades are mostly from rouge bunny rouge as well. i used "golden rhea" over the inner two-thirds of the lid, with "whispering ibis" on the outer third. i used a little of the black shade from armani's "neo-black" palette to deepen the outer corners slightly. i brushed rbr "bohemian waxwing" along the upper part of the crease and inglot "351" under my brows as a matte highlight. then i finished up by lining my upper lash lines with urban decay "invasion" liner [a gorgeous dark green-teal] and the perfunctory mascara- upper and lower. 

the lipstick is a limited shade that mac put out a few years ago called "blooming lovely". it's a very greyed lavender shade that came out as part of their collaboration with british fashion label liberty of london, a small but excellent collection in adorable packaging. with all of the shades that mac has brought back multiple times in the last few years and excitement that a purple lipstick usually generates, i'm kind of astonished that this one has never made a second appearance. there really has never been anything quite like it, although inglot has a shade that's close, just lighter and icier [and, as a result, more difficult to pull off].

so what do you think? is this a trend of the future? or a mistake made eternal through the power of the internet? 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

presidenting is hard :: these people are not your friends

hello mr. president! a while back, i promised that i would periodically be giving you some advice on how to do your job, since you seem a little unclear on how everything works. i didn't mean to go so long between missives, but the fact is that i've been busy and you're administration has been in overdrive giving me things to write about. what i've realised is that many of those things are ones i can't help you with: if you or anyone in your immediate circle worked with russians to compromise the 2016 election, that shit is done. robert mueller is going to find that out, because he's the kind of person who looks like the theme from dragnet just automatically starts playing every time he enters a room. so that's your problem. i'm just here to talk to you about what you can do now that you are, by law, the president. because, while chief detective mueller is doing his thing, we all need to live with your decisions. i'm even less happy about that than…

write brain

i was talking to a friend of mine about coffee, specifically about our mutual need for coffee, yesterday and, literally as i was in the middle of a thought, an idea occurred to me that i felt like i had to note. so there i am, scribbling a note to myself that was really just a word salad of related terms, which i later transformed into a weird but more comprehensible note that i could refer to later. [i don't want another beatriz coca situation on my hands.] i feel like this idea isn't a story on its own, but something that i could incorporate into a larger project, which is good, because i have a few of those.

now, of course, i need to sit down and do research on this, because it's become terribly important to me that the details of this weird little idea that i'm planning on incorporating into a larger thing be totally plausible, even though no one but me is ever going to care. i'm increasingly convinced that the goal of every writer is to find someone who will t…

luck of the irish?

i like st. patrick's day. i like the fact that there is a holiday that celebrates celtic-ness and drunkeness at once (you could argue they were pretty close to begin with). in fact, it's probably second only to halloween as my favourite publicly recognised holiday.

so every year, i have to have my little ritual and that ritual involves visiting a pub and partaking of the cheer. i've made attempts at watching parades in various cities, but i've more recently given up that practice because a) eight out of ten times, it's freezing cold and/ or snowing in canada on march 17th and b) the parades seem to consist entirely of trucks carrying people who are as drunk as i would be, if i weren't freezing my tush off watching them. so i've backed off the parade in recent years.

however, a visit to the pub, the longer the better, is still an important thing for me.

next year, however, i'm going to have to plan things a little better.

first of all, i didn't …