Skip to main content

making faces :: fall in, part 3 [the vamp stamp]

this post is almost a repeat, since i did a post including three favourite vampy lipsticks a while back, but even then, one of them [mac "tribalist"] was no longer available and in the interim tom ford has seen fit to discontinue "black orchid". that's a shame and i suspect that we'll see a mad rush on these on ebay, with buyers demanding ridiculous prices. i'm glad that i still have plenty left on mine.

but for those of you who are still searching for that perfect dark lipstick to set your halloween-loving heart a-flutter, i'm here to help. and by help, i mean recommend places where you can spend your money.

first, a word about what i mean by "vampy". there are lots of dark lipsticks. every company has darker shades. but truly vamp shades, the kind that channel silver screen icons like theda bara [ok, you only ever got to see her in black and white, but the term "vamp" was coined for her, so she's my go-to example], are a particular breed.

they are exceptionally deep, for starters. chanel "fatale" is a great fall red, but it's not a vamp colour. it's too bright.

but as dark as they are, they're not black. black is cold and sharp and modern. to me, there's something antiqued about a true vamp shade. 

by my definition [and it's my blog, so i get to impose these], there is no such thing as a purely cool vampy lipstick. ultra-dark cool purples are also too modern, just like black. a vampy purple will have a hint of red.

to that end, vamp shades are somewhat difficult to define in terms of colour, because they tend to be a mix of dark red, dark brown and dark purple. they may lean towards one, but the best ones contain elements of all three.

so given those points, here are a few of my very favourites that you can buy now and for the foreseeable future.

609, sorry for the finger smudge
armani :: rouge d'armani 609

this was initially released as a limited shade with a small collection called "downtown". the collection was just half a dozen lipstick shades, but i'm assuming that it was successful, despite a ridiculously low profile, because every single one of the shades has migrated into the permanent collection, including this one, which may be the be-all, end-all of vampy lipsticks.

it has the strange distinction of appearing somewhat sheer when swatched, but on lips it's completely opaque. for those who mourn the loss of "black orchid", this is the closest thing you're going to find. it's a bit browner, but they're very, very close. also, i prefer the rouge d'armani formula, which technically means that this one, in my books, is an improvement.

armani at its finest is a wonder to behold. pure class.

611
armani :: rouge d'armani 611

this is a recent release that i've reviewed already, but i can't not include it. you can see how it's redder and more opaque than #609, a little more cabernet to 609's barolo. i've nothing to add to my original review. i hope that this one is being made permanent, because it truly deserves its place in the department store sun. because it's a more opaque shade, i find it's just a little more dramatic than #609, despite being a wee smidgen lighter.

how i love thee.

chanel :: controversy

if you think all glosses are light on pigment, meet controversy. a new [and possibly permanent, i've heard conflicting things] addition to the chanel extrait de gloss line-up, it's a long-wearing, nearly opaque shade that truly meets the definition of vamp. it's not a deep colour done sheer. this is the real deal. yes, this is chanel's "heavy duty" gloss formula, but the fact is that i generally don't find them that close to opaque. but "controversy" is truly an untamed beast.

controversy
dark brown predominates, but there's definitely a healthy dose of purple and just a smidgen of red at work. it's a great colour that doesn't make me look drained, as many dark browns can do.

the greatest thing about this product, though, is the formula. dark glosses are notoriously uneven, which makes them annoying to apply, wear and layer. not "controversy". it goes on smooth, layers evenly and wears extremely well. it fades over a few hours to a stain with remarkable tenacity. so for once, it's a gloss with all the great properties of a lipstick. bravo, chanel. bravo.

[and lest we forget, the last time i did a list like this, i recommended chanel's "ballet russe" rouge coco lipstick. this remains an absolute favourite of mine, a deep plum brown with purple undertones.]

yves st. laurent :: prune avenue

there are a lot of things that yves st. laurent does well, but one thing that they've come to do better than anyone is deep, dramatic lipsticks. they increasingly own the dark end of the colour range like this shade, from their fall collection and possibly an addition to the permanent rouge pur couture range. [again, i've heard conflicting things.]

prune avenue
the purple predominates in this shade, but it has the bloody red-brown undertone that's just autumn perfection. applied, it's smooth and satiny, nearly matte, but not quite. i find it's difficult to overdo the colour, too, because it goes on in lighter layers. it isn't perfectly even on dry lips, but it's still good. maybe make sure that you exfoliate and dab a little balm, or use a lip primer if you believe in them. the formula is neither hydrating nor drying and the lasting time is terrific for something so lightweight.

yves st. laurent have a lot of dark options and, as mentioned above, i think that if you want a quality deep colour, they should be your first stop. [or armani, clearly, although they don't have the number of dark shades available that ysl does.] they all have that easy layering quality, which makes them adjustable to various situations, day and night. other shades to check out would be the deep berry "pourpre carmine" and the icy dark purple "pourpre divin". of course, they also have a fantastic selection of what i'll term the "near darks".

Comments

Bellyhead said…
I'm not a gloss kinda person, but the Chanel Controversy is glorious! That layered over a lipstick would be killer!
You have a really beautiful vamp collection!!
Kate MacDonald said…
Thanks Belly. Believe me, the vamp collection swatches could go on and on... Controversy is a gloss, but it almost leans toward being a liquid lipstick if you layer it. Definitely something to win over the gloss-averse girls like you and me.
Lucinda Veen said…
I agree that YSL does deep shades beautifully. One of my favorite lipsticks ever is Rouge Pur Couture in Belle de Rose, a dark purply-fuchsia berry. It's probably too bright and clear to be truly "vampy" by your standards, and it has no brown at all, but it's a gorgeous fall color.
Kate MacDonald said…
Hi Lucinda! Would you believe that I don't own Belle de Rose? From photos, it does look almost dark enough to meet even my overly-strict definition of a vampy lip.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …