Skip to main content

we have our share of stupid

yes, i like to make fun of the country to the south and their government. i feel entitled. i've had to put up with years of crappy economy because our major trading partner thought it would be a great idea to start some new wars in the middle east. [although as someone who does an increasing amount of shopping on line, i do kind of like the whole collapse of the currency thing took our dollar from around $0.62usd to being on par for the last few years and the foreseeable future.] but despite the comedy gold that is routinely offered by politicians below the 49th parallel, i am occasionally reminded that my view of their shenanigans is afforded by the immense glass house that i inhabit and that i probably shouldn't go pelting rocks in their general direction.

witness the current media uproar over comments by tom flanagan about viewing child pornography.

tom flanagan was a senior advisor to our prime minister for many years. it's important to understand that, because a lot of times, reporters get a little over-zealous and start linking people to political campaigns when they really didn't do much except hand out some pamphlets or ask people to sign petitions. this isn't one of those cases. this is a guy who worked really closely with our current prime minister.

he also worked on the campaign of alberta's provincial wild rose party, a very romantic sounding name for a party that was established because the right-wing conservative party was a little to soft-edged for some. [for those of you who don't know, alberta is kind of like our texas, but also our nebraska and wyoming and oklahoma.] he had more recently made the transition to media commentator, which is kind of like being put out to stud for a back-room political operative. you get to just shoot your mouth with other partisan hacks and they give you money you probably don't need. [although, occasionally up here, they actually manage to choose some pretty incredible panelists. witness the triumvirate of dalton camp [conservative], eric kierans [liberal] and stephen lewis [new democrat] who for years discussed the state of canadian affairs on the cbc's excellent "morningside" radio show.]

tom flanagan is no stranger to controversy. he distinguished himself a couple of years back by saying that someone should do the world a favour and murder julian assange from wikileaks. ok, i'm being unfair. he said "assassinate", which sounds way more covert and cool. he said someone should assassinate julian assange. so apparently, the guy who advises our supposedly tough-on-crime prime minister is totally fine with citizens of other countries being given a hemlock soda if they do things that piss him off.

but this week, flanagan decided that he needed to speak up for the rights of one of a particularly vilified minority: consumers of child porn.

no, seriously.

flanagan apparently feels that it sets a dangerous precedent to prosecute people for their "taste in pictures". i'd no idea until that moment that child pornography was a "taste". seems akin to calling a lynch mob a sports team.

flanagan also went on to insist that he never looks at child porn himself, although he somehow ended up on the NAMBLA mailing list for some time. really? dude, how long did it take you to figure out that you should probably get the hell off their mailing list? if someone played a practical joke on me by signing me up for their newsletter, i can tell you that i would be screaming blue murder the second the first one arrived to ensure that i never, ever got assaulted with their propaganda again. tom flanagan apparently thought he could just ride it out and also thought that this was a totally appropriate thing to share with others.

but it gets worse.

as it happens, flanagan wasn't having a stroke or on bad mushrooms. he was actually responding to a question about similar statements he'd made in 2009. that's right. he'd already held these views for several years and was attempting to defend them.

of course, there is now a real calgary stampede on the right to put some distance between the man and the politicians he helped elect, with those on the right trying to scamper away from the association although, one must note, none of them seemed terrifically upset about the comments from 2009. or the comments about how julian assange should be killed. it's only now that there's a video of him voicing this opinion that flanagan [who's said he "regrets" the statements] really seems to have crossed a line.

their theatrical revulsion has received media publicity, but i have to wonder: if this guy has held these sorts of opinions for years and has worked extremely closely with various conservative political organisations, how did they not know about this? i mean, not everyone discusses views on child porn over a few beers, but surely this is the sort of thing that must have come up when discussing, say, legal policy about the possession and distribution of child pornography. if his views were ok then, why aren't they ok now that everyone knows about them?

it's a rhetorical question.

i just wanted you all to know that my government is apparently advised by people who think that selective murdering is cool and that child pornography is a lifestyle choice.

Comments

Shadowy Lady said…
OMG I hadn't heard this yet! Maybe coz I've been (and still am) overseas. And can I add randomly that I think Harper looks awkward next to almost anyone.

Being in the Caribbean and spending time amongst the ppl as opposed to being in a resort has got me to appreciate the great country we have though. I'm a Liberal, but I take Harper and his selfish renaming of "Canadian government" to "Harper's Government" over how ppl live here.

Can you tell I miss home? LOL!
Kate MacDonald said…
You make a good point, in that we do have a lot of advantages here. All the more reason to safeguard what we have...

as long as you're here, why not read more?

long suffering

i've been meaning to write this post for a while, but, every time i get started, something happens that makes me rethink portions of it, to add or subtract or consider a different way of looking at things. the post was originally going to be my take on a #metoo statement, but i ended up making that post on my personal facebook page. [it's not that i don't love you all, but there are a few things i'm not comfortable putting in the entirely public sphere.] but beyond joining the #metoo juggernaut, i wanted to write something about the wave of sexual assault revelations that continues to swell over the north american media landscape that wasn't about me. then i realised that that was a little more complicated than just writing "so, lotta sex rapes happenin' these days, ain't there?" or whatever it was that i was going to say.

so i tried writing something about just a part of it: the media coverage or the entertainment industry or the politicians or …

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…