Skip to main content

spam of the week :: writers' strike?

i got three spam messages this week that looked like this:


EFE7B636A4C38FAADA2C74FFF3F431C4B9EB9D5EA94A30C8AE275F799DD2E12870AFA9A5011D0E7BB39CDB312A15EB45C9BB9876


that's it. well, there's a web site link, but that really doesn't interest me. 


i'd like to think that there's a code, but i sort of doubt it. so it looks to me like spammers are just getting extremely lazy, since they can't even be bothered to make up some hilariously misspelled text about how they were the business partner of some crazy deposed dead tyrant and need me to babysit their gold bullion for a while. but then i noticed...


all the codes in the different spam messages are different. completely different. why would anyone bother with that? do they think that there are people who are going to be fooled into following the link because they haven't yet received that specific code of letters and numbers? "well the first five i knew were ridiculous, but then i saw numbers that almost matched my birthday on line three and i figured this one was special."


or perhaps they're doing all these different combinations to be mysterious. like they suddenly want to seem all serious now that we've figured out that they aren't the crown prince of nigeria. maybe they think that if they send something strange and inscrutable that we'll stop posting these messages and making fun of them, in which case, they need to be told that no one gets mocked as viciously as people who are difficult to understand. 


but in the interests of having fun, here's my pre-crafted equally-spammy response:


comrade,
thank you for your message. understand that we cannot stop the mission at this time. we will take measures to try to ensure your safety, but you must always be ready to take ultimate responsibility.  watch your local newspapers tomorrow for crucial developments
you may find what you are looking for in your car. no further communication can take place through this channel. certain elements may have already been compromised.
to the greater glory! w.a.s.t.e. 

i figure that if there is anything even resembling a human being involved in this process, that should be enough to make them a little paranoid. at the very least, it should get their creative juices flowing again.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…

making faces :: chanel's velvet realm

who doesn't love velvet? i know when i was younger, i used to, as george costanza longed to, "drape myself in velvet" and although that phase passed with time, i still think that the plush fabric has to be one of the high points of human achievement, up there with interior heating, advanced medicine and vodka. so to me, it's no surprise that one of the most hotly anticipated launches in the cosmetic world is chanel's new "rouge allure velvet" lipstick line, because even the name immediately makes me want to put it on my lips.

on a more concrete level, chanel describes these lipsticks as "luminous matte", which is sort of like the holy grail for lipstick lovers. we all want those intense, come-hither film noir lips, the sort where young men and sunlight are lost and never heard from again, but historically [including during the making of those films], applying a matte lipstick felt sort of like colouring in your lips with an old crayon that had…