Skip to main content

making faces :: sunday silliness [face of the day]

over the weather, under the weather
i'm the first person to admit that, if i don't have anything particularly pressing, or if for some reason i haven't been able to have coffee, i don't bother making myself look all spiffy. on the other hand, days when you're pretty much free to do what you want can also be great for trying things out that you wouldn't normally, particularly if circumstances force you into situations where you have to be cautious about the impression you're making on others.

such days also offer me the opportunity to go through my cosmetics list [yes, i keep a list, because as the collection gets bigger and the memory gets dodgier, i'm lucky if i can remember which part of the face gets the shadow and which the gloss] and find things that i haven't pulled out in a while.

since this weekend's freakishly warm weather has seemed less like thanksgiving and more like "thank god it's summer", i figured i'd try out something appropriately bright and summery-looking as well. [yes, as much as i love the deep, sultry colours of fall, sometimes you have to punch it up a little.]

SEE THE RESULTS [AND SILLINESS]...



i decided to pull out mac's "cobalt" eye shadow and one of their "superglass" lip glosses, neither of which has seen much love recently. "cobalt" is a matte and has a reputation for being one dry and stiff- decent qualities in a man, but generally undesirable in makeup. i don't actually find that it's all that bad. to me, the biggest problem with it is that it tends to sheer out quite easily, so getting a nice, intense shade like it appears in the pan, can be an exercise in frustration. it's similar to "atlantic blue", which is also a permanent product, and to "royale" which was just released with the "fall colour collection". i'm given to understand that the colour payoff on the latter is better than on the first two... if you need an excuse to go shopping.

the "superglass" formula was something that mac introduced last year in a limited edition. based on reactions i heard, i'd expect them to be brought back sometime between the pigs flying and the snowstorm in hell. unlike a lot of people, i liked them. they compare to mac's sparkly "dazzleglass" glosses, but they're thicker [meaning they last longer and don't move around as much] without being overly sticky. plus, they're even more dazzling because they're infused with a lot more glittery bits that reflect the light. personally, i don't find that i can see the glitter unless i'm really looking myself directly in the lips [which is kind of difficult to do, either for me or for anyone else], so it's more like looking at the sun sparkling on a pond. and who wouldn't want pond lips?

here's what i used:

face ::
mac matchmaster foundation "1" [i've been trying this out and am pretty impressed]
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"

eyes ::
mac e/s "vanilla" - slightly peachy light neutral
mac e/s "sweet & punchy"*- chartreuse
mac e/s "humid"- pine green
mac e/s "blue absinthe"* - darkened teal
mac e/s "cobalt"- bright iris blue
mac superslick liquid liner "on the hunt"- black
stila sparkle liquid liner "curacao"- shimmery bright blue
mac powerpoint eye liner "undercurrent" - teal
diorshow mascara

shades marked * are limited edition, but there are substitutes available, of course. because the stila liner wasn't as dark as i wanted on its own, i layered the black liner under it. the eyelid is basically a gradient moving from the chartreuse to the green to the teal, with "cobalt" in the crease. "vanilla" is used as a highlighter and blended with the colours below to soften them a bit.

cheeks ::
mac mineralize skinfinish "redhead" - shimmery gold-salmon

lips ::
mac lip liner "dervish"- muted pink
mac superglass l/g "disco blend"- warm peach

and of course, what's the point of getting all dolled up if you can't horse around with a couple of your favourite guys and a digital camera?[and yes, dom is spending this holiday weekend sick as a particularly nauseous dog with a bad cough. but he was still a good enough sport to come and play photo op with me and simon [who loves playing photo op more than just about anything].







Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

long suffering

i've been meaning to write this post for a while, but, every time i get started, something happens that makes me rethink portions of it, to add or subtract or consider a different way of looking at things. the post was originally going to be my take on a #metoo statement, but i ended up making that post on my personal facebook page. [it's not that i don't love you all, but there are a few things i'm not comfortable putting in the entirely public sphere.] but beyond joining the #metoo juggernaut, i wanted to write something about the wave of sexual assault revelations that continues to swell over the north american media landscape that wasn't about me. then i realised that that was a little more complicated than just writing "so, lotta sex rapes happenin' these days, ain't there?" or whatever it was that i was going to say.

so i tried writing something about just a part of it: the media coverage or the entertainment industry or the politicians or …

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

making faces :: getting cheeky

blush might just be the last thing that a beauty lover comes to appreciate, seeing as it can be a matter of slight degrees that separates one product from another, and it's most difficult to tell from just swatching a product how it's going to look. and it did take me a long time to appreciate that, despite loving my refined pallor and believing that my natural rosy flush was more than enough of a blush for me, blush is my friend. it softens, sculpts, perfects and, although you might not see it at first blush [yuk yuk yuk], it is something that subtly harmonises with the other colours in a look to make it "complete". yes, it's the most tricky thing to pull off when you're wearing something that doesn't mesh with your own undertones. but it's also the thing that can take a face from gloomy to glowing with a swish of the magic wand known as a makeup brush.

highlighters are an even trickier lot, since many of the more brilliant ones have a tendency to e…