Skip to main content

auto-destruct

i don't own a car. i never have and, considering that it's my preference to live in cities, i don't plan on owning one in the near future.

that said, when the auto industry came begging to government to save them, both in the united states and, more quietly, here in canada, i wasn't entirely averse to propping them up. even if you take the libertarian capitalist view that, if these companies are allowed to collapse, someone will buy up their assets and start a new car company, you need some kind of plan for dealing with the interim real world where millions of people in both the primary and secondary industries will be thrown out of work. basically, the government is going to pay for those people one way or the other, either in the form of auto-industry support or in the form of employment insurance and welfare. by bailing out the car companies, you at least have the chance of getting the money back at some point in the future.

this was supposed to be the week where we found out what the payback plan looked like. this was the week when the automakers were going to reveal their plan to get lean and get serious about reversing the flow of money out their door. and they seem to have got a handle on the first part, however, the plan is decidedly lacking on details about the second half of that equation.

car companies have shown that they are more than capable for planning for cutbacks- that they can strategically eliminate jobs and facilities or curtail benefits to current and previous employees. the problem with that, if you're the one loaning them money (and you are), is that cutting back on expenses doesn't help them pay off their loans. It just means that they're going to take a longer time to go through the money your handing them. in the midst of discussing what concessions workers are and aren't going to agree to, no one seems to be asking what it is that's going to generate the money that will be used to repay the loans their taking out now.

to put this in perspective, picture yourself applying for a bank loan. the person at the bank asks you to tell them your plan for repaying the loan and your answer is "i'm going to move to a cheaper apartment, get rid of my cable and high speed internet and i'm not going to eat take out any more". what are the odds that you're going to get that loan? (actually, to carry this analogy further, the auto industry's ascertain that, in contrast to actual events, americans will just buy more cars than ever and that this will allow them to pay back what they owe would be akin to telling a banker that you intend to repay your personal loan by earning more money and leaving it at that.)

i don't like the idea of putting millions of people out of work. i don't like the idea of shutting down a sector that will throw the economy into more turmoil. i'm looking for work as it is and, to be selfish for a moment, i don't need the competition.

however, what i've seen this week doesn't inspire me to open my taxpayer's purse. we may need an auto industry in north america, but i think we also need a completely different group of people running it.

Comments

Michael said…
You've never owned a car? Wow!

I'm sure there can't be Americans who have never owned a car. Unfortunately I live in a city with almost zero public transport and commute into a larger city very not much more than that.

I envy you being in the position where you can get around without a car. I wish I could.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

write brain

i was talking to a friend of mine about coffee, specifically about our mutual need for coffee, yesterday and, literally as i was in the middle of a thought, an idea occurred to me that i felt like i had to note. so there i am, scribbling a note to myself that was really just a word salad of related terms, which i later transformed into a weird but more comprehensible note that i could refer to later. [i don't want another beatriz coca situation on my hands.] i feel like this idea isn't a story on its own, but something that i could incorporate into a larger project, which is good, because i have a few of those.

now, of course, i need to sit down and do research on this, because it's become terribly important to me that the details of this weird little idea that i'm planning on incorporating into a larger thing be totally plausible, even though no one but me is ever going to care. i'm increasingly convinced that the goal of every writer is to find someone who will t…

dream vacation

i've written about this before, but i have an odd tendency to travel in my sleep. i don't mean that i roll around  and shift positions a lot [although that was a problem in my childhood], but rather that i take these strange vacations in other places that do actually exist, for no particular reason. i would love to travel more, like most people i know, but in my dreams, i seem to pick places that wouldn't normally occur to me. [like greenland, which was actually green when i dreamt about it, and the volcanoes between chile and antarctica that i swear i didn't know about before i dreamt them, but which really do exist.]

for instance, a couple of nights ago, i dreamt that dom and i had gone on vacation to jerusalem, more specifically east jerusalem, also known as  the palestinian section, and also where a lot of palestinian homes get bulldozed. it's walled off from the west, israeli, part of the city, although the two are connected by a light rail line and a lot of h…

presidenting is hard :: these people are not your friends

hello mr. president! a while back, i promised that i would periodically be giving you some advice on how to do your job, since you seem a little unclear on how everything works. i didn't mean to go so long between missives, but the fact is that i've been busy and you're administration has been in overdrive giving me things to write about. what i've realised is that many of those things are ones i can't help you with: if you or anyone in your immediate circle worked with russians to compromise the 2016 election, that shit is done. robert mueller is going to find that out, because he's the kind of person who looks like the theme from dragnet just automatically starts playing every time he enters a room. so that's your problem. i'm just here to talk to you about what you can do now that you are, by law, the president. because, while chief detective mueller is doing his thing, we all need to live with your decisions. i'm even less happy about that than…