Skip to main content

unsolicited opinion #14368

since i don't live there, i try very hard not to care about american politics. i try not to pay too much attention, because i frankly find it depressing. however, with the country's pre-eminent position in the world and given my instinctual interest in the political, i do get caught up some times.

having just returned from a business trip to one of those parts of america that i would otherwise never go, i have just been subjected to a fearsome amount of political "reporting" on their major "news" networks. and what are they talking about? john kerry's stupid comments about (depending on who you believe) george bush or american soldiers.

i'm trying to wrap my head around this. america's economy has slid in the last years and is completely ill-equipped to deal with the realities of global markets of the near future. they are embroiled in a war that is costing them billions of dollars, thousands of lives and whatever international good will they had maintained to date. they have prominent members of their government facing criminal and civil charges. and according to their "news" media, the most important issue in the current electoral campaign is whether or not a failed presidential candidate thinks the people in the nation's army are smart or not?

let me simplify this: prominent u.s. politicians are generally drawn from the upper classes, educated at schools and possessing employment backgrounds that are beyond the dreams of the vast majority of their citizens. they have no direct knowledge of the challenges faced by most of their constituents. they are not representative of the make-up of the country in any sense- economic, racial, gender, anything. so why the big surprise that one of them holds a large class of his own constituents in contempt? does kerry think of the mass of americans- soldiers or not- as proletarian dullards? probably, in his own mind, yes. guess what? so does bush, in all likelihood.

and the most unfortunate thing is that, rather than becoming politically engaged in arenas where they might actually make a difference, most people are content to sit back and keep electing the same over-privileged, out of touch, sanctimonious crowd every two years. and what does that say about the people who are electing them? (and i'm aware that canada isn't a whole lot better.)

anyway, no matter what happens on tuesday, and there seem to be a number of ballot initiatives that deserve attention in different districts, the people who are elected are going to look a lot like the ones who are there now. and until there is some change that starts from the mass of people who politicians represent, american politics is going to continue to be a pretty depressing thing.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

the world at war?

in my semi-smug but genuinely curious way, i posted a question on my facebook page earlier: how much of the world has to be at war before it counts as world war iii?



the first response i got raised the very legitimate point that this is the sort of question that gets answered by historians, once the haze of the present has faded. the other important factor is that people don't just declare war on each other the way that they used to. major powers entered both the of the world wars with the blessings of their own parliaments, whereas conflicts since world war ii have happened in coded language, sometimes circumventing the political process in the interests of expediency. president reagan never declared war on the nicaraguan government in the eighties, for example, but the united states was clearly in a state of armed conflict, even if most of the arms were being carried by their proxies, the contras.

whether or not we are living in a world at war is a tricky question. despite what…

jihadvertising?

i keep seeing this ad for tictac candies:



am i the only one who finds the suicide bomber clown at the end a little unnerving? all the nice natural things like the bunny and the [extinct] woolly mammoth and the fruit get devoured by a trying-to-appear-nonthreatening-but-obviously-psychotic clown who then blows himself up. congratulations, tictac, i think this ad has landed you on about a dozen watch lists.

oh and by the way, showing me that your product will somehow cause my stomach to explode in a rainbow of wtf makes me believe that doing consuming tictacs would be a worse dietary decision than the time i ate two raw eggs and a half a bottle of hot sauce on a dare.

diet diary, part 2

so the battle with the bulge continues. i'm actually becoming used to the pace, although for some reason my stomach still seems to think it needs far more food than it actually does.

week days, when eating is more of a functional than a festive activity, are fairly easy to cope with. weekends are a challenge, especially living in a city that has as many good restaurants as toronto. i'm not restricting myself to the home, but i am finding that i have to pay careul attention when i go out. last night, i overindulged on injera atthe ethiopian house. injera (the soft, moist, spongy bread that serves as food and cutlery in ethiopian cuisine) makes food fun by forcing you to eat with your fingers. it's hard to exercise restraint in such conditions.

when i first moved to toronto, i was expecting to find it much as i remembered it from years ago- with a dearth of good eating places. apparently, things have changed. there are great places to eat just about every kind of food you&…