Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: the dangers of diagnosing

when you take a look at any reputable online source of information about mental health, it comes with a warning that anything you read on the site should not be considered a substitute for evaluation by a medical professional. so why are so many people jumping on the bandwagon to diagnose donald trump?

it's not uncommon for people to make glib judgments about the mental health of others, because we think that we understand what disorders entail. when i was working in offices, i noticed a lot of this: an immature and garrulous employee being labeled and partially excused because others were certain he had adhd, or a moody and indecisive boss dismissed as bipolar. [as you can imagine, that one struck me as particularly ignorant and, since i was the audience, ironic.] but in the case of trump, even professionals are weighing in on the subject. no fewer than twenty-seven psychiatrists have collaborated on a book called the dangerous case of donald trump. up to now, it's been understood that medical professionals don't comment on the cases of people they haven't evaluated themselves, for obvious reasons. when psychiatrists appear in the media to talk about someone's mental health, it's generally to explain what a condition is, what the warning signs are, or how it's treated, and most will be quick to point out that they are not going to address questions of a particular person's mental state.

the book's authors are very conscious of the fact that they are placing their footprints on a professional moon here, but their rationale is that there comes a point where the warning signs are so abundant that it would be more irresponsible to remain silent. one doctor has even said that the president's mental state is an imminent threat to the nation.

one can also argue that the interdiction against indirect diagnosis is one that doesn't necessarily apply to the modern world, or at least that it doesn't apply to the example of someone like donald trump. after all, no one has done more to cause concern over trump's mental health than the man himself, whether it's his desperate tweets about how smart, successful and well-loved he is, or his tendency to drift aimlessly from one idea to another within the course of a single sentence. social media and the non-stop news cycle has already given us more insight into the minds of public figures than we've ever had, but trump pushes that much further; he completely rejects any idea that he should present a front that is in any way presidential, gracious, or polished. furthermore, he is incapable of remaining silent on any subject, so that we are constantly drowning in a river of sewage gushing forth from his addled brain.

the two most common diagnoses given by observers are that trump suffers from narcissistic personality disorder, or that he shows signs of dementia. he does fall, broadly speaking, into the risk group for both: narcissistic personality disorder is diagnosed more frequently in men than women by a 3 to 1 margin, while his age increases his risk of dementia the same as it does for everyone. that, combined with his bizarre and very  public behavior, is enough for many to ring alarms.

these two fallback explanations for trump are very different things: some level of dementia affects between 5 and 8 percent of people over 60 worldwide, making it pretty common. although it's far more common among poorer people, it isn't something that's unknown in the white house: reagan showed marked deterioration in his second term and did indeed develop alzheimer's. [the extent of reagan's deterioration in office is still hotly debated.] the condition is degenerative and will absolutely affect trump's ability to do his job. it's something that disqualifies him from being president because there is no predicting how far or how fast it will progress, only that it will do so.

a personality disorder is something more ephemeral. it's hard to predict what will happen, how it can be treated and how it will affect the person with it. the nature of personality disorders in general isn't well understood, and it's compounded by the fact that some of them seem "gendered", being applied far more often to either men or women, depending on the exact criteria. trump's ridiculous self-aggrandizement, his seeming inability to feel empathy and his willingness to justify anything in his past do seem like the hallmarks of a narcissist. and some have been able to make a compelling case that his statements do form a roadmap of the npd checklist.

i'm not anywhere near qualified to question psychiatrists' evaluations of trump,  since they're more versed than i'll ever be. but i do have an uneasy feeling about the public desire to explain trump's "eccentricities" by saying they're caused by a mental disorder. it's not just that i get uncomfortable with the idea of non-professionals [which most of the opinion-givers are] making calls based on incomplete or flawed information. what worries me more is that, by trying to explain trump's behaviour,  we're actually excusing it.

dementia doesn't explain why trump and his father were brought up on charges for refusing to sell their properties to blacks. it doesn't explain why the man who makes such a show of adoring the military refused to serve in it. it doesn't explain why he was able to stick to a very consistent claim that president obama wasn't born in the united states.

likewise, it's easy to confuse someone who has narcissistic personality disorder with someone who is a narcissist. not every narcissist has a disorder. and, for what it's worth, one of the people involved in establishing the clinical definitions of personality disorders says that trump doesn't meet the criteria. first and foremost, his point is that suffering from a mental disorder involves... suffering. trump, on the other hand, pursues his narcissist's agenda in order to get personal rewards. people with mental disorders have a compulsion to act the way that they do. acting badly because it can generate gains is a matter of forethought.

the other danger is that we start to equate mental illness with being unable to perform jobs like that of president: ones with great power and responsibility. but even if donald trump does suffer from narcissistic personality disorder, he'd hardly be the only president to have spent time in office fighting demons. it's well-established that abraham lincoln suffered from major depression for years. no one is saying that he was unfit for the job.

if trump is unfit, it is not because he has a mental disorder, but because he is incompetent on every requirement necessary for the job. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

filthy lucre

donald trump has shown utter indifference to the possible torture and killing of an american-based journalist jamal khashoggi by saudi arabian security forces acting on the direction of saudi crown prince mohammed bin salman but that's hardly a surprise. he said on the campaign trail that he loved the saudis because they gave him money. he refused to consider placing saudis on his infamous "muslim travel ban" list, despite the fact that saudi arabia is the one country that has been credibly linked to the september 11 terrorist attacks. or that the saudis' particular brand of fundamentalist islam has been described as the root of the extremism espoused by groups like al-qaeda and isis.

trump likes wealthy people and the saudi royals are the blueprint of the type of wealthy people he likes. they spend and live in lavish excess. family members are like catnip for the international celebrity press, even if the news media [like khashoggi] are perceived as enemies of the …

real americans

recently in my genealogical research, i encountered something that i never anticipated: americans.

i knew that some of my grandfather's family had emigrated to pennsylvania in the early part of the twentieth century and that my father has even in recent years gone to visit some cousins in the northeast [they were big bernie sanders supporters, apparently] but that was, as far as i knew, my only connection to our southern neighbour.

but it turns out, that's far from the case. one of my british relatives who abandoned the old country in favour of life in the colonies landed in the united states and shortly after was married to a woman with an obviously dutch name. i assumed that they had met on the boat on the way over because, as far as i knew, he moved up to canada right away. but she was actually american-born, the daughter of a dutchman from boston and an established english family. when i say "established", i don't mean that they were members of the genteel cl…

making faces :: written in the stars, in lipstick [part two]

it's the middle of september already? i'm not prepared for that? i mean, i am prepared for it because the heat this summer has been murder on me and i've been begging for a reprieve for months but i'm still bowled over by the speed at which time passes. this year, i've been measuring time through the launches of bite beauty's astrology collection, which arrives like the full moon once a month. [the full moon arrives every four weeks, which is less than any month except february -ed.] earlier this year, i took a look at the first four launches of the collection and already it's time to catch up with four more.

the most important thing for you to know is that after several months of problems, bite and sephora appear to have sorted out their inventory planning. for the last several releases, information has been clear and reliable as to when and where each lipstick will be available [pre-orders taken for a couple of days on bite's own website and a general…