Skip to main content

oh lord

a friend sent me this hilarious image, which illustrates why english is really a bullshit language:


ok, all languages evolve, and you really don't have to go back that far with most of them before you don't know what they're talking about, but really, if it weren't for the fact that the above languages were spoken in the same territories, would you say they were the same? [smarter people than you say they are -ed.]

but, as i look at the picture, a dark cloud descends upon me. aside from the change in language, it seems that god himself has undergone a pretty significant change. 

i'm not versed in old english, but i am reasonably well-versed in the others, and it seems that the middle english and king james version are pretty close to one another. the middle english christian was nourished by the waters, whereas, by the seventeenth century, god was just leading people to them and, presumably, going to collect some more. 

but in the middle and king james versions, it's clear that god makes people to lie down in the splendour of the green pastures. in the modern version, he lets them do so. no longer is relaxation and contemplation the purpose of human life. by 1989, those things are privileges. 

furthermore, the middle and king james versions both indicate that christians shall not want for anything- that's what god has promised them. that was a load of hooey even at the time, because plenty of people were in want of even basic things, but it holds out the promise that it's god's plan that they should not want for anything. [note: that doesn't mean that they would have everything that they wanted, only that they would not be "in want", i.e., of those things that were necessary.] 

in the modern version, that is altered so that it is a statement of present fact: i lack nothing. it no longer matters what god's plan is. the person who says the prayer in modern language is saying that they are fine the way they are, which is ridiculous, since there are millions of christians in varying states of deprivation. 

i'm not in touch with god, at least not unless i skip my medication for a few days [and even then, it's dicey], but perhaps someone who is could enlighten us all as to how come he's snuck these lousy changes to the agreement in. because in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it almost looks like the people translating/ transcribing the bible altered it to reflect the shift in morality that occurred in the industrial revolution, where those in power insisted that people should be happy with what they were given, no matter how little it was, and should consider themselves lucky not to have less. 

personally, i think that god might want to have a word with his admin staff. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

dreamspeak

ok, so i've been lax about posting here. i apologise. there are reasons. i don't know if they'ree good reasons, but they include:


i've had a lot of work to do, which is nice because i'm a freelancer and things tend to slow down in the summer, so the more work i get now, the less i have to worry about later [in theory].i started watching the handmaid's tale. i was a little hesitant because i didn't actually like the novel very much; i found it heavy-handed and predictable. the series relies on the novel for about 80% of its first season plot but i nevertheless find it spellbinding. where i felt that the novel beat readers with its politics, the series does a better job of connecting with the humanity in the midst of politics. i'm dithering on starting season two because i am a serial binger and once i know damn well that starting the second season will soon consign me to the horrors of having to wait a week between episodes. i don't know if i can han…

i agree, smedley [or, smokers totally saved our planet in 1983]

so this conversation happened [via text, so i have evidence and possibly so does the canadian government and the nsa].

dom and i were trying to settle our mutual nerves about tomorrow night's conversion screening, remembering that we've made a fine little film that people should see. which is just about exactly what dom had said when i responded thusly:

me :: i agree smedley. [pauses for a moment] did you get that here?

dom :: no?

me :: the aliens who were looking at earth and then decided it wasn't worth bothering with because people smoked even though it was bad for them?
come to think of it, that might mean that smokers prevented an alien invasion in the seventies.

dom :: what ?!?!?

me :: i've had wine and very little food. [pause] but the alien thing was real. [pause.] well, real on tv.

dom :: please eat something.

of course, i was wrong. the ad in question ran in 1983. this is the part where i would triumphantly embed the ad from youtube, except that the governmen…

mental health mondays :: separate and not equal

given the ubiquitousness of racial disparities in the united states, there's no reason why we should be surprised that they exist in mental health care. unlike a lot of other areas, the people in power have acknowledged the problem for decades. but the situation isn't getting any better. 
the united states surgeon general documented the differences between white and non-white mental health care back in 2001 so we can assume that it was already a known problem at that point. two years later, a presidential commission said the same damn thing and groups like the national association for mental health seized on this to develop guidelines on how to bridge the ethnic gap. from the turn of the century through 2007, the number of papers and publications talking about the mental health care gap spiked. the issue was viewed as being on par with obesity when it came to urgent problems.

starting in 2004, researchers undertook a massive project that involved the records of nearly a quart…