Skip to main content

armchair centre back :: the end is near

hard to believe it's been a month since the euro final tournament kicked off. tomorrow, we have the final showdown between france and portugal. [excuse me, i have to suppress bile every time i say that last bit.] so there's no doubt who i'll be supporting tomorrow. i do find it odd that, after a competition that has seen many, many shocks, the team that was the bookmakers' favourite to win the cup does look likely to do so. as far as dom's picks and mine? we need to sharpen our game a little... here's how we fared:

winner :: tbd

we said :: germany. we both said germany. i did, however, say that germany was vulnerable to their own complacency, and i would say that that was a factor in their final game against france. having beaten them with relative ease in the world cup two years ago, perhaps germany felt they could turn in a solid, but not brilliant performance. and that's what they did. unfortunately for them, france did turn in a brilliant performance.

"alternate" winner :: tbd

dom said :: spain. and but for a really lopsided draw that placed almost all the big teams playing each other early on in the knockout rounds, it wasn't a bad guess. still, spain got dropped by italy in the round of 16 and went home early.

i said :: france. so hey, i've still got a shot.

dark horse [team who would do better than expected] :: not an exact science, but the obvious candidates would be wales and iceland

dom said :: england. moving on...

i said :: i'd like to quote myself exactly here: "i desperately want to say wales. so desperately. but as a sleeper candidate, i'd say poland." the moral of this story? go with your heart.

underperformer :: spain didn't advance as far as people thought they would, and belgium, as the world's most expensive team, were certainly humbled by wales, but truly, there was only one team who went home with their three lion tails between their legs. oh britannia...

we said :: portugal. sigh. we were wrong. to be fair, portugal just barely managed to stick it out in a path that saw them face no team ranked in the top 25 in the world. their only convincing win was against wales [damn them to hell]. i also said that i thought belgium could be a disappointment, and while they showed some moments of brilliance, they were wildly inconsistent. so maybe i get a half-point for that.

best man candy :: take your pick!

there was a plethora of beauties to pick from, but here are some of the loveliest we've lost...

mario gomez [so happy to see you back at your best after missing the world cup two years ago]



jason denayer [new on my radar, but i hope that manchester city brings him back from loan, so that i can see his pretty face in premier league games]



mats hummels [the most popular search term leading to the blog this week has been "mats hummels nude". we all want that... this is the best i can do in the meantime. 




not that he doesn't look great with clothes...
graziano pellè [there have been rumours that his time in the premier league is coming to an end. heaven forbid!]




and here are a couple we'll get to see one last time tomorrow...

from portugal... cedric soares [actually a teammate of pellè's at southampton when he's not playing for his country. and yes, i do totally think he's preferable to that other portuguese guy.]


it takes some serious cuteness to pull off a bandage... he kinda does
and from france... morgan schneiderlin [was also with southampton up until last year, when he was traded to manchester united and seemed just so thrilled to be there. now faced with the prospect of having to work under jose mourinho, he has to be feeling even lower. so here's hoping adorable morgan has a great day tomorrow and gets traded to a team he actually likes.]

dreaming of being somewhere other than manchester

allez les bleus! after the tough times france has had recently, you absolutely deserve it.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …