Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: #getloud with the cmha

this week, we're going green!
when i promised that i'd be continuing the series i'd started on personality disorders, i didn't realise that this week marks the start of the annual canadian mental health association's annual awareness week. this year, as last, they're using the hashtag #getloud to encourage people both to talk about mental health issues and to raise their voice in support of increased mental health funding for canadians. [of course, you could just as easily use the opportunity to increase the call for increased funding wherever you are in the world.]

and in case you think this is all about hollering "more money", without a plan as to how it should be used, you should check out the specific objectives of the cmha plan, especially the mental health transition and innovation fund [link goes to pdf].

there are a number of ways that you can get loud/ involved, which range from wearing green to hosting fundraising events, all of which are outlined here.

i think it's pretty clear that one of the main ways that i think people can help increase awareness of [and funding for] mental illness is through spreading information on all of its facets. as a result, i have several years worth of mental health mondays posts, which you are free to peruse at your leisure. if i may be so bold, you might want to check out this post i did for the last canadian federal election on the policies of various parties on mental health, since it has a list of questions that still need to be answered by politicians.

so, yes, the personality disorders posts will return next week, for realsies, in this space. but for this week, i'm just going to be content with encouraging everyone to talk about these issues and to do whatever they can to create a climate where those discussions can be had out in the open, where they can benefit the most people and where they can yield results.

yours in loudness,
kate

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …