Skip to main content

making faces :: wearing the wrong colours, vol. 1

i've talked about doing this for a while, but i thought now was as good a time as any to get started. i've been writing for some time about seasonal colour analysis and specifically the 12-season sci/art model, based on evaluating colour by hue [warm vs cool], value [light vs dark] and chroma [saturated vs muted]. after a lot of playing around, i've narrowed myself down to a bright season [very high chroma], most likely bright winter [cooler and darker], but possibly bright spring [warmer and lighter]. 

in theory, that means that i should avoid colours that are soft [low in saturation], especially those that have an autumnal [brown, gold] heat to them. bright seasons don't have any of that in them, being a combination of cold, jewel-like winter and warm, fruity spring. so does that mean that those sorts of colours are off-limits to me forever? 

if you answered "yes", i'm assuming this is your first visit here. [which is fine. welcome. i love having new friends. look around, please. but you might as well know from the start that i don't respond well to absolute rules.]

today, i wore a look that should be completely wrong on me. the eye makeup is a combination of rouge bunny rouge "periwinkle cardinal" and "papyrus canary" with the pewter and white gold shades from guerlain's limited "liu" palette. more specifically, i used the white gold shade from liu on the inner part of the lid, "periwinkle cardinal" on the outer lid and then used the pewter shade to blend them. i used "papyrus canary" to soften the colours along the crease to the brow bone and added more of the white gold shade under the eyebrow as a highlight. i used a combination of the pewter and "periwinkle cardinal" along the lower lash line. 

for liner, i've used nars "baalbek" eye paint on the upper lash line and mac "i get no kick" along the lower water line. mascara is yves st. laurent effet faux cils baby doll. 

the cheeks are a combination of nars "torrid", a soft apricot, and guerlain "parure de nuit", a delicate white-coral-pink highlighter. 

finally, the lips are nars audacious lipstick "leslie". i've fallen behind in my audacious lipstick reviews, simply because there's so much new stuff to catch up with, but this is a fairly new acquisition and one that conflicts with everything about my colouring. it sits right on the border between brown and red, giving it a deep, sullen, ruddy look. it sits so perfectly on the red-brown boundary that i can't say with certainty which it is. in photos, it looks redder, but in person, it seems browner, especially in the feeble late autumn light we have now. 



i'm sharing this, because i like this look. i like it despite the fact that the elements aren't in line with my colouration. soft sage green and dirty pewter are anathema to a bright winter complexion that demands clarity and saturation above all. the hot clay colour of "leslie" is a poor choice for anyone who doesn't have a significant contribution from autumn in their colouring. nonetheless, i like this look. 

why? well, i think that there is enough contrast between the eyes and the lip to work. the eyeliner is dark enough to give definition, in combination with the black mascara. the blush/ highlighter combination may be a little warm for my skin, but it definitely gives that soft glow that benefits a spring-touched complexion [as opposed to the molten or lustrous metallic sheen that compliments autumnal colouring]. finally, while the lip colour might be too "hot" or muddled for a bright season complexion, it does have enough contrast with my skin to complement the wintery effect underneath. all seasons in winter's reach benefit from sharp contrast and when that is done right, you have a little more leeway on temperature and clarity. 

so what's the point of knowing your "season" if you can just cheat in whatever colours you want? well, i think it's a matter of knowing how to cheat in the colours you want. if i'd worn this with a bronze and cranberry eye combination, or a dirty orange shade of blush, or if i'd gone with a peachy-gold shade of lipstick, i don't think that i would have liked the results at all. which is a complicated way of saying that knowing the most important things about your personal season can be instructive in figuring out how to incorporate elements that wouldn't normally fall within your limitations. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

so hip it hurts

there aren't too many artists who stand out as being iconically canadian. it's too easy to mistake us for some other people, mostly americans, who are, let's be honest, pretty similar in a lot of ways. [this is the bit where i apologise for avril lavigne, justin bieber and drake.] the guess who/ bachman turner overdrive held sway over an earlier generation, and musicians and those who appreciate technical proficiency will speak of rush like they are gods, but last night the country said goodbye to perhaps the most canadian of canadian bands, the tragically hip.

for those of you not familiar with that name, the hip emerged in the mid-to-late eighties, among a slew of canadian bands [54-40, the northern pikes, the pursuit of happiness, the grapes of wrath] that balanced on the line between mainstream and alternative rock. all of them played accessible guitar-based music with none of the bombast of seventies dinosaurs, but equally with no hint of the drug-fueled anger that w…

shut up

general reaction seems to be that last night's vice presidential debate was close to a draw, with a slight edge going to mike pence [other than among cnn's panel of independent voters, who overwhelmingly chose tim kaine as the winner]. i feel that's an accurate assessment, although it's largely a question of personal preference. pence absolutely projected the stoic, unflappable, unwavering image that many americans [not just republicans, either] seem to like and equate with strength. for my part, i prefer someone who's a little more mercurial, someone who's able to gets excited about ideas and who's able to expand on them, not just repeat talking points.

so, from my point of view, both vice presidential candidates were pretty disappointing. i found that kaine had a fantastic command of facts and history- he knew pence's voting record better than pence knew his and possibly better than pence knew his own. his opening answers were so smoothly delivered i…

mental health mondays :: parabnormal?

for north america and parts of europe, halloween marked the apex of spooky events, where the veil between the worlds of the living and the dead was at its most diaphanous. but if you're a very traditional roman catholic, you'll know that the 31 of october is merely the beginning, and that the entire month that follows is dedicated to remembering and praying for the dead, specifically for those whose souls are trapped in purgatory. if you listen to dante, purgatory isn't especially pleasant. sure, there's the possibility that you'll end up working off your debt to celestial society, but until then, you get to endure things like having your goddamned eyes sewn shut with iron wire. [much like condo developments, it gets better the higher the floor you live on.]

however, the more common view of purgatory among catholics is that the souls relegated there can't do anything to help themselves, and are reliant on the prayers of their living relatives and loved ones to …