Skip to main content

making faces :: festive face

this is just a quick post to share my highly official christmas face with all of you. as usual, we spent the day itself with dominic's family, which was its usual combination of tasty and fun. i don't do anything spectacular for the occasion [i'm not sure how my in-laws would react if i showed up looking like an extra from cirque du soleil], but i do at least try to mark the day by pulling together a family-event-appropriate look. this year, i went with the time-honoured classic of neutral eyes and red lips, which may not be the most exciting thing in the world, but it's classic for a reason.

the other reason that i wanted to try out tom ford's "something wild" lipstick, a new shade that's been added to the permanent lineup of colours he has available. there are several new colours, several of which were interesting to me, but "something wild" qualified as a must have because it's named after the movie that dom and i watched on our very first date. it's a film by jonathan demme [who also directed stop making sense and the silence of the lambs], a quirky little gem that's only now getting the respect that it deserves. it was given the fancy-schmancy treatment with a dvd/ blu-ray reissue on criterion, arbiters of all things classy in the film world. [at least i'm assuming that this is what the lipstick is named for, and not the 1961 rape-revenge drama with the same title.]

the bottom line is that i wanted an occasion to take "something wild" out for a spin and a holiday dinner with his family seemed like the right one.

the shade is a gorgeous warm coral-red with very delicate gold shimmer in its depths. it doesn't read as a frosted colour, but there is a pearl-like finish thanks to the shimmer content. it's in the red family, but it's definitely muted, so it's appropriate for wear at a conservative office or a family get-together. it reminds me of guerlain rouge g "grenade", which seems like the cool-toned version of this colour. they won't look similar, but both are softer reds with a pearly look that makes lips appear smoother and fuller.

in terms of the formula, i feel like tom ford lipsticks get more hydrating every time i try one. this one was really pleasant to apply and wear and went on perfectly even despite feeling very emollient. the one problem i encountered was that there was feathering after a few hours of wear, so if you're eating or drinking, you'll want to clean your lipstick off entirely and make sure your lips are dry and clear of any residual oil before reapplying. of course, you could also get around this by wearing a lip liner. i can't imagine that there's one around that would be a really good match, but urban decay has a clear one that's good for everything. [urban decay and bite also have lip priming products that can help with feathering.]

i picked out a few favourites to go with the lipstick, so here's the complete look:




the base ::
hourglass mineral veil primer
nars smudgeproof eyeshadow base
urban decay naked skin foundation "1.0"
diorskin nude concealer "01"
guerlain pressed meteorites "clair"

the eyes ::
rouge bunny rouge e/s "rain dove"
rouge bunny rouge e/s "rufous-tailed weaver"
rouge bunny rouge e/s "umber firefinch"
armani eye tint "rose ashes"
nars eye paint "baalbek"
yvs st. laurent effet faux cils baby doll mascara
makeup forever concealer pencil

the cheeks ::
charlotte tilbury filmstar bronze and glow "light/ medium"
armani cheek fabric blush 509 "eccentrico"

the lips ::
tom ford lipstick "something wild"

looking at that list, i realise that i never got around to reviewing nars' eye paints, mostly because i didn't buy any until well after they launched. i honestly use them pretty much exclusively as liners, but i'd consider them worth the investment even if i never get around to trying them as cream shadows. "baalbek" is particularly stunning, a deep, shimmery antique gold kind of colour.

i also never reviewed the guerlain pressed meteorites, which were introduced with their spring collection this year. they are actually my first experience with meteorites at all, since the regular little balls just seem to be tempting fate with the cats around. i like the effect, but i find that it's a very narrow window between "makes no difference" and "i look like something out of the 17th century". i could say that it's a technique that i need to perfect, but i've been playing around with the product for a while and it seems like it shouldn't take me this long to get the hang of it.

that said, this is an example of a successful application, where it gives my skin a nice, healthy finish, but isn't immediately visible.

as many of you have probably noted, i'm a little awkward with the holidays. there are things that i really enjoy [food and cooking, the more traditional or restrained decorations, the emphasis on kindness and giving], but a lot of the louder, more public things [the music, the phony sentiment, the pressure to spend] are unbearable. i'd much rather mark them quietly, with good food and company, by dressing up just a little and taking a bit more care than usual to look good for the occasion.

hope you've all been able to maximize the things that you enjoy about this time of year and to minimize those which cause stress. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…