Skip to main content

making faces :: inspired by summer meadows

the last few days, we've had a bit of a reprieve from the overwhelming heat of summer, and although it's scheduled to get toasty again, i'm currently experiencing that swell of excitement that comes with late summer: the refreshing breezes, the sweet scents of ferns and late summer flowers, mixed with dried grasses and those slightly past their prime trees, just about to start turning to the spectacular display of colour we'll experience in october.

before summer truly fades, there's that wonderful period where everything is alive and bursting with colour, which is how i usually think of august. let me offer you some examples:






 and in homage to those beautiful images of summer meadows, i thought i'd share with you a look that i did that was inspired by them. clearly, i needed some soft greens as a base and a warm, sunny, but somewhat hazy light to the skin. the lips, of course, were meant to mimic the pop of colour from the flowers in our imaginary face-meadow and come courtesy of rouge bunny rouge's new lipstick lineup.

rbr revamped all of their lipsticks earlier this year, with many of the shades moseying off into the sunset and fresh recruits joining the team. most noticeably, the "succulence of dew" semi-sheer line now has two bold, juicy new additions. in this look, you're seeing the juicy red "relish of heaven", a great neutral red [i think it will lean a little warmer or cooler depending on your undertone] with excellent colour payoff, but just a little translucency to it. the formula is indeed improved, with substantially more staying power. the colour fades to a lovely stain and while it won't survive a hearty meal, you'll have a decent dose of colour left behind after a couple of cocktails or a bowl of soup. if you want to reapply, i suggest removing any remaining colour and doing an entirely fresh coat, since there can be some minor feathering. it's not unexpected for such an emollient formula, nor is it the worst i've seen by a long stretch. for something with so much slip, it applies very evenly, which is a relief.

a little peek at my new bunnies

i'll be posting a review of the other shade that i picked up from the new line, the sweet fuchsia "jasmine-weighted air", in the near future and will include comparisons for both shades. for the moment, i'll just mention that semi-opaque reds aren't particularly common, so that alone gives this an edge in the uniqueness stakes against a massive poppy field.




here's what comprised the entire look

the base ::
nars all day luminous, weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
mac e/s "bright sunshine" [shimmery golden yellow]
rbr e/s "whispering ibis" [soft basil green]
armani eyes to kill e/s "gold hercule" [dirty grey-gold]*
rbr e/s "papyrus canary" [matte ecru]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "invasion" [dark green-teal]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
rbr liquid bronzer "as if it were summer still" [shimmery golden brown]
nars blush "torrid" [warm light apricot]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "luminous light" [candlelit glow]

the lips ::
rbr succulence of dew l/s "relish of heaven" [juicy sour cherry red]


the nails [for once neat enough to post! and on theme!] :: 
essie "sew psyched" [deep sage green]
opi "my gecko does tricks" [translucent shimmery lime green]

*suggested alternate :: gold hercule = nars paramaribo [lighter shade] + nars vent glacé [darker shade] might get you close, but this is almost impossible to replicate.

anything in nature inspire you? after all, capturing the colours of nature and adorning ourselves with them is the very essence of cosmetics.

Comments

Subway Dreaming said…
Lovely - really like the matching nails!

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …