Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: read the signs

while writing yesterday's paranoid theory of the week post, i touched on the topic of schizophrenia and the signs of onset. it was an amateur opinion, one based on stories i've been told and observations i've made from schizophrenics [and those close to them] that i've known. sometimes, the condition can present quite suddenly [it can also disappear quite suddenly, although no one knows why and it's certainly not everyone who experiences this, but we'll deal with that another time], in which case it's easier to recognise. however, at other times, it can be very subtle. so i thought i'd offer some information culled together from various places on the internet, combined with some personal observations [which are clearly delineated, so that you aren't confused between what experts are saying and what i'm saying] that can help you determine if you or someone you know might be in danger of developing schizophrenia. i'm choosing to focus on this one because it's poorly understood, especially if it presents as something other than psychosis, so a lot of early warning signs tend to go unheeded.

one of the things that's often missed in discussions about schizophrenia [aside from the fact that it's frequently confused with bipolar and/ or dissociative identity disorder] is that it causes two "sets" of symptoms: positive symptoms, like delusions or hallucinations, which involve things being present that shouldn't be, and negative symptoms, where things that should be present are absent. another important thing to remember is that schizophrenia affects between 1 and 3% of the population worldwide [with little variation depending on place, as we've already seen], which makes it pretty rare, so it shouldn't necessarily be a first conclusion. finally, it usually presents in late adolescence or early adulthood, between the ages of 15 and 25. that doesn't mean that the 37 year old you know with these symptoms can't be schizophrenic, but it does make it less likely.

so now that we have those things out of the way, let's talk about what schizophrenia looks like.

well, unfortunately, it looks a lot like adolescence. for instance:

  • withdrawal from social activity
  • drop in grades
  • changes in groups of friends
  • irritability
  • excessive reactions to criticism
  • unhealthy or inappropriate sleep patterns [periods of insomnia and/ or excessive sleeping]

we'd all be locked up if those were the criteria. so, in my opinion, those are things to consider in the context of other, more telling symptoms. "positive" early symptoms of schizophrenia can include:
  • paranoia and delusions of persecution: a sense that one is being targeted by others [known or unknown] and that others mean one harm
  • delusions of reference: a term meaning a belief that neutral objects, like a television set or stars, are implicated in activity connected directly to the person [e.g., communicating or speaking to them, following them, monitoring them...]
  • disorganised speech: this can refer to things that are simply nonsensical, or jumping from one topic to another without any relation [as a test, if someone does frequently make this type of non-sequitur, i'd suggest asking them in a friendly way how they got from a to b: sometimes, perfectly rational people just spin through a series of topics in their head without explaining, but someone edging towards schizophrenia is less likely to know how they made a connection, or the connection won't make anymore sense than the original non-sequitur.]

positive symptoms are the easiest to recognise and the most specific to schizophrenia. they can be indicative of other things, but any of these, and certainly any combination of these are what i'd consider serious red flags. the so-called "word salad", or very disorganised speech, where random words just seem to fall out of a person in a big, random pile, is particularly difficult for a schizophrenia to hide and should not ever be ignored. [that is to say, if it happens reasonably often, or if the person doesn't realise why what they've said is bizarre.] it can be a symptom of a few things aside from schizophrenia, and all of them are serious.

delusions should clearly be a major concern, but the evidence of them can be subtle. it's a myth that all schizophrenics will discuss their delusions with others because they believe them to be true. unless they are in full-blown psychosis, many of them are perfectly aware that their ideas might seem strange or unbelievable to others, and some even fear that something bad will happen to them if they share what they "know".

in light of that, here are a few subtle indicators of delusions at work:

  • preoccupation with one person or thing, particularly a negative or suspicious preoccupation
  • a repeated pattern of behaviour that seems to make no logical sense
  • a preoccupation with how one is thought of by others [delusions are most often founded on the sense that one has a particular importance or significance, greater than that of others]
  • frequently hearing things that aren't there [we all do it some times, but if it happens a lot, it can be an early sign of auditory hallucinations, whether it's thinking that one hears something outside, or thinks someone has spoken when they haven't]
  • sensitivity to stimuli such as lights, sounds, smells or touch [again, that sensitivity can be a precursor to hallucinations- believing that the stimulus is much stronger than it is]
  • inappropriate emotional responses

negative symptoms of schizophrenia are much harder to pin down, but they can be just as indicative of a problem. my advice with these is to put them in context with other possible symptoms, considering how frequently they occur, how severe they seem compared to an "average person", etc. after all, a lot of these are things that we all do- some of us quite frequently. here are a few:

  • lack of emotion [schizophrenics tend to appear unaffected by anything external]
  • blank, empty-eyed expression [again, we all get this sometimes, but a schizophrenic will have this more frequently, including when they're not just "spacing out"]
  • difficulty expressing emotion either verbally or physically [such as through facial expressions]
  • ignoring personal hygiene
  • pronounced forgetfulness or absent-mindedness [including frequently losing objects or being unable to remember how to do simple tasks]

these are all warning signs, but, as you can see, most of them aren't unique to schizophrenia. so the most important thing i can recommend is that you get a professional diagnosis. unless you're a psychiatrist [and let me repeat, i'm not], you aren't capable of diagnosing schizophrenia and you shouldn't be telling people you suspect they have it. say that they've seemed depressed and maybe they'd benefit from talking to a professional. talk to your own doctor about how you can offer help, or if you're concerned about aspects of your own behaviour. [another myth about mental illness is that people can't recognise the symptoms in themselves. many people with serious mental disorders know there's something wrong, they just don't feel like they have control over it and/ or don't understand what's making it happen. even people who have psychotic episodes can be aware afterwards that their behaviour was "crazy", sort of like how others might remember being a night of binge drinking. that doesn't mean that the disorder is any less severe.] but telling someone that you think they have schizophrenia [or telling yourself that you do] can be damaging and appear hostile.

of course, finding out that you have schizophrenia just sucks. the treatments are hard on your system and just because you catch it early doesn't mean that the disorder won't worsen with time. but knowing that you have it and getting it treated sucks a lot less than getting to a point where you're so disconnected from reality that you're a danger to yourself and possibly to others. and when someone is exhibiting symptoms, the risk of bad news is a better option than the risk of a bad future. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …