Skip to main content

making faces :: fuchsia fever with armani

oh, you know i love me a good fuchsia. so when i heard that armani had a spring collection called "fuchsia maharajah", i immediately had a conversation with my bank account about the shock it could expect. because when i go to the armani counter without warning, i'm sure the poor account thinks it's dying. as it happens, i ended up doing less damage than i'd initially thought, but due entirely to the fact that not all of the collection appears to have made it to my counters. really, the combination of armani + bold pinks and purples is something that i'm not going to be able to resist.

the collection is inspired by shades of fuchsia used in indian fabric dyes, the bold, saturated shades of cotton and silk, that put europeans in mind of passion, intensity and the exotic. this does continue on the orientalist theme that armani established late last year for their holiday collection, although there isn't any obvious link to southeast asia apart from the name. [the model used for the collection is white and the look she wears has no particular influence from indian makeup trends.]

the collection is very much focused on the lips; it's like the second part of armani's spring collection following the release of the eye tints. there are three "sets" [although each item is sold separately] of colours, featuring a new and limited rouge ecstasy lipstick, a coordinating gloss and a nail polish. the shades are as follows:

"pink blush" : bright, cool pink
"maharajah" : an reddened fuchsia
"garconne fatale" : a deep purple

there's also a shimmery base coat for nails and one new and limited shade of rouge d'armani lipstick, also called "maharajah" [i swear they did that just to confuse their sales associates]. i limited myself [haha] to three lipsticks: the rouge ecstasy shades "maharajah" and "garconne fatale" and the rouge d'armani "maharajah". i thought about the glosses and am still thinking about them, but i'm always questioning how much i'm going to love a gloss, given that i don't wear them a lot. [and while i like the newer armani glosses, i don't love them the way i did the short-lived gloss d'armani formula from 2011.] also, i couldn't find "pink blush" lipstick anywhere, or i imagine that would have come home with me as well.




those who frequent this blog know that the rouge ecstasy is one of my very favourite lipstick formulas. it feels like a light balm that nourishes the lips while providing mostly opaque colour that lasts for hours with a satin-matte finish. they aren't quite as intensely pigmented as the rouge d'armani lipsticks, but they do pack a punch.

both "maharajah" [aka #512] and "garconne fatale" [aka #604] are typical of my past experiences with rouge ecstasy, so as you can imagine, i'm getting a lot of use from them. both are bold colours in different ways, so they aren't going to appeal greatly to those who are shy of a statement lip. [go for the glosses!]

"maharajah" is a red-leaning hot pink that swatches quite sheer, but gives quite the pop of colour applied. i have a feeling this will pull warmer or cooler depending on your skin tone, because there clearly is some sheerness to the formula, but it will be more of a subtle harmonising with the underlying colour- you won't see a huge effect on the final shade.

rouge ecstasy 512 maharajah
there are a lot of fuchsia shades out there, but i didn't have any exact matches. mac "gesina", a limited shade from their first collaboration with marcel wanders, is deeper and redder. i had actually wanted to compare it to mac "catharina", which seems to pull a little warmer, but my tube seems to have gone missing. you can see "catharina" here. ellis faas "l403" is noticeably cooler [and more opaque/ intense on the lips].

l to r :: mac gesina [l.e.], r.e. maharajah, ellis faas l403
"garconne fatale" is a deep purple that leans just a little red, without veering into berry territory. one thing that i find about the rouge ecstasy formula is that the darkest shades don't run terribly dark. there is always a bit of brightness because they aren't fully opaque. so while "garconne fatale" is deep, it isn't what i'd call full-on vamp. it's sort of like a gateway drug for people who are thinking of trying out the super-dark lip.

rouge ecstasy 604 garconne fatale
armani "attitude" is noticeably redder and warmer. mac "spitfire" [limited edition from the wonder woman collection] is greyer and more muted. [i also find that "spitfire" looks heavier when applied, because it is more opaque.]

armani r.e. attitude, r.e. garconne fatale, mac spitfire [l.e.]
the sole rouge d'armani shade included in the collection, the first new rouge d'armani since the fall 2013 collection, "maharajah" [#513, although it is not the same as the previous shade #513 released in the formula] is a bold shade for bold people. it's an incredibly intense red-fuchsia with a find violet-pink shimmer throughout. the shimmer is very subtle when applied and gives more of a cool sheen than anything. the difference in intensity and the cooler shimmer makes it appear different enough on the lips that i think it warrants owning both [obviously -ed.], as long as you like shades of this sort.

rouge d'armani 513 maharajah
"maharajah" rouge ecstasy is a bit softer and pinker and appears quite a bit warmer on the lips. urban decay "jilted" is darker and cooler [both the base and the sheen].

l to r :: r.e. maharajah, rda maharajah, urban decay jilted
i did find that the formula of "maharajah" was different than other rouge d'armani lipsticks i've tried. the texture is noticeably dryer, to the point where it's a little difficult to apply. this is something that happens with very pigmented lipsticks, but i've never had it happen with armani. i was worried, because dry formula often equals drying formula, but that isn't the case here. it actually feels very nice when applied, it's just a little trickier to apply it.

clearly, this is a collection for women [or men] who like a certain type of colour. the glosses offer a lower-wattage alternative in the same family, but they're still very pigmented compared to other glosses. the lipsticks are muscular, almost aggressive shades. "garconne fatale" actually seems to represent the muted end of the collection and it's not exactly what you'd call a soft shade.

here's a quick look at all three lipsticks in action...

rouge ecstasy "maharajah"

 


the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "siberia"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
mac mega metal e/s "tweet me" [peach with pink and gold shimmer]*
mac veluxe pearl e/s "da bling" [warm pink with gold shimmer]
mac satin e/s "hot hot hot" [bold pinky orange]*
mac veluxe pearl e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
illamasqua precision gel e/l [black]
benefit they're real mascara

the cheeks ::
yves st. laurent blush "pepper rose" [dusty mauve-pink]
hourglass ambient lighting blush "ethereal glow" [cool white-pink]

the lips ::
armani rouge ecstasy l/s "maharajah" [bright red fuchsia]

*suggested alternates :: tweet me = mac melon pigment; hot hot hot = mac orange [warmer/ yellower]

rouge ecstasy "garconne fatale"




the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
marc jacobs e/s palette "the punk" [dirty silver, bright orchid purple, deep royal purple]
armani e/s "moon jelly" [cool purple with blue shimmer]
inglot matte e/s "351" [ivory highlight]
illamasqua precision gel e/l [black]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
mac blush "next to skin" [cool beige]*
... i'm fairly certain there's another blush in there, but i forgot to write it down... moving on...

the lips ::
armani rouge ecstasy "garconne fatale" [deep reddened purple]

*suggested alternates :: next to skin = mac strada [lighter] or cubic [darker]

note :: as you can probably tell, this look was photographed on a much cloudier day than the others. as a result, i think it gets the short shrift, because the photos don't do it justice at all. i got impatient waiting for another sunny day and so i decided to post these. i hope it at least gives you an idea of the colour and smooth texture of the lipstick.

rouge d'armani "maharajah"




the base ::
nars luminous weightless foundation "mont blanc"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
ellis faas eye light "e301" [sparkly platinum]
armani eye tint "cold copper" [metallic taupe]
mac veluxe pearl e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "perversion" [blackest ever black]
dior new look mascara

the cheeks ::
dior creme blush "pareo" [bold, cool fuchsia]*
hourglass ambient lighting powder "radiant light" [warm amber]
bobbi brown highlight powder "porcelain pearl" [soft white]

the lips ::
rouge d'armani l/s "maharajah" [intense fuchsia with cool shimmer]

*suggested alternates :: pareo = mac azalea [cooler, pinker]

the bottom line? if you think that this looks like your think, then it is. you may have shades similar to the rouge ecstasy lipstick, but i'd honestly recommend them for the formula alone, plus their ability to adapt to individual colouring makes them very easy to wear. the rouge d'armani is more unique, but also a little more finicky to work with. all of the shades are beautiful to behold and will scare away the spring rain clouds in a hurry.

p.s. :: the image above shows decor from an indian wedding. sign me up! 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …