Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: #crazylivesmatter

kristiana coignard
you may well have heard the story in the last week of kristiana coignard, the seventeen year old who was shot to death by texas police inside a local police station. the usual haze of clear vs unclear has descended on the case with predictable rapidity, but there are certain things that are undisputed

  • coignard entered the police station at around 6:30 local time and picked up a courtesy phone that connected her to the police dispatch centre. 
  • on the phone, she said that she wanted to speak to a police officer and shortly thereafter, an officer arrived. a confrontation developed almost immediately.
  • two other officers arrived in short order and seconds late, coignard was shot dead. 

you don't have to take my word for it on this either, because there's video from the police station. [warning!! graphic content. did you read those points above? this is cctv video of a girl getting shot by police.]



another part of the story that is not disputed is that kristiana coignard suffered from mental illness. she had twice been hospitalized for bipolar disorder- specifically for suicide attempts. her aunt has told the press that she had been taking medication and seeing a counselor since december, at least, although with two hospital stays in her past, one assumes that this could not possibly have been the first time that she received psychiatric treatment.

police say that coignard brandished a weapon, a 13-inch knife. the video footage makes it difficult to tell for certain: there is definitely something that she does that causes the first officer to pin her down, although she doesn't appear to show any sort of weapon [the police department has claimed she had the words "i have a gun" written on her palm, which does appear credible if you watch her actions and the first officer's reactions]. in fact, the first officer seems to subdue her with relative ease, and it's only after the second and third officers arrive that things get out of control.

inadvertently, the second officer blocks the camera's view of the suspect/ victim, so it's impossible to tell what, if anything, she brandished. she does clearly advance toward the first officer and is shot and killed instantly. the second officer does appear to check for vital signs at one point, but there is never an attempt at any lifesaving measures.

it's no secret that police interactions with the mentally ill often end in tragedy. although no agency collects data on the specific number of mentally ill people killed by police in "justifiable homicides", a 2013 joint report by the treatment advocacy centre and the national sheriffs' association compiled a number of anecdotal reports that would indicate that there are an increasing number of such "justifiable homicides" where the victim had a mental disorder and, while civilian deaths at the hands of police may have decreased slightly over the last thirty years [surprised?], homicides resulting from attacks against police- often the hallmark of someone who is unstable- have skyrocketed.

there are a few key reasons for the grim statistics and none of them make me optimistic for the future. the first is that most police just aren't trained in how to deal with the mentally ill in any meaningful way. there are programs, specifically the crisis intervention training program created by the national alliance on mental illness, which, at forty hours, runs close to a university course, is considered the gold standard. unfortunately, most police officers get nothing close to that level of training and many aren't required to get training at all.

second, health care cutbacks have drastically reduced the facilities available to the mentally ill, which means that even if the police were to do the right thing and take an unstable person into custody in order to take them to an inpatient facility for evaluation and treatment, there isn't necessarily any place for them to do so. many times [although not in the case of kristiana coignard], when a mentally ill person is shot by police, they are likely to have a history of run-ins, none of which addressed the central problem of their medical needs. the fact is that even the best-trained police officers are helpless if there are no health care facilities available for these patients and all that training will simply allow them to resolve crisis after crisis with the same individuals, a pretty depressing thought for everyone involved.

third and most depressing, the previous two problems are not high priority issues, because the populace at large still tends to view the mentally ill as aberrant and dangerous to those around them. despite their vulnerability, people with mental disorders are disposable at best, a menace at worst, in the eyes of a great number of their community members. mentally ill people are disproportionately likely to be poor and to have substance abuse problems and, as mentioned before, many of the most troubled have numerous encounters with police. all of these make them "bad victims", the sort of people with whom the average person is unlikely to sympathize.

brian claunch
the police officers present during kristiana coignard's homicide have been put on administrative leave, pending an investigation of their handling of the situation. i sincerely hope that the police department agrees to have the video analysed by an expert in crisis intervention, but in trigger-happy texas, i suspect that won't happen. just a couple of years ago and not very far away, houston police shot and killed schizophrenic double amputee brian claunch in a home for mental patients after he became agitated and threatening with one of his care workers.

although claunch had a police record dating back to the 1980s [including the incident in 1990 where he prostrated himself of train tracks to purge the devil from his body, leading to the loss of an arm and a leg, and a 2009 arrest for cocaine possession which eventually saw him declared unfit to stand trial and remanded to the facility where he would spend the rest of his life] and despite the fact that the houston police department had a highly trained crisis intervention team at their disposal, they responded to the call at the home without any special precautions. [a spokesman for the facility claimed that static on the line might have meant that  the 911 operator who answered the call didn't realise that the person was mentally ill and so never communicated that to police. to reiterate, this was a call to a facility for mental patients.] claunch was shot when, still irrational and angry, he threatened officers with what turned out to be a pen. a grand jury declined to indict the officer responsible.

because coignard is younger and, let's not pretend it doesn't matter, more photogenic than a lot of such victims, her case has blazed through social media in the ten days since her death, but online cries for justice are by no means a guarantee of result. if killing a man in a wheelchair holding a pen is justifiable, it's unlikely that killing an able-bodied young woman with a large knife will be problematic. in the meantime, we can hope that at the very least, the case helps raise the awareness of what is happening and what solutions are available, and that it helps dispel the myth of the mentally ill monster once and for all.

Comments

way2aware said…
This is fucked. A knife, she had? WTF is wrong with maybe going with a choice to disable an [alleged] attacker, particularly those who do not brandish firearms? There is absolutely no honor in this, nothing but shame to follow these ...cops.. for the rest of their careers, and lives over this. But they just had to shoot her dead.
I think there were far greater mental health issues with these disgraceful idiots, by far, than the person they chose to execute. Anyone who would willingly choose to take away everything a person has in life, and everything they will ever have... when they could realistically have chosen a less deadly course of action, is a fucking murderous wackjob, plain and simple

as long as you're here, why not read more?

so what the hell happened here?

even i'm shocked at the fact that i haven't written a blog post in a month and a half. and i'm confused by it, which many of you may not be because, hey, blogs are dead, right? well, i don't know if they're dead dead. this place gets a surprising number of daily views considering that there have been no new posts since early february. and if you're one of the regular readers who might have been checking in to see which of my regular subjects i'd be tackling next, i'm going to have to disappoint you: this post is just going to be some meaningless blather.

first of all, i didn't intend to step back from the blog- not for a month and a half, not at all. i figured i'd just keep motoring on much as i had been for the last dozen or so years, if for no other reason than it had become as natural to me as breathing or reading stuff on the internet that made me angry.

so why haven't i written anything here?

it's not because i've lacked subjec…

making faces :: three springs

this post comes with a bit of a preamble:

it's hardly surprising that i would eventually become fascinated by the sci-art theory of personal colour,
given that it's linked both with aesthetics and with psychology. i'm actually a little surprised that it took me this long, but i have been making up for lost time by reading through a lot of the posts on the fascinating 12 blueprints blog, after having gotten a taste for the subject from reading everyday beauty's adventures in being drapes.

for those not familiar with the concept, i do not claim to be an expert, but it basically stems from theories of how we perceive colours. for someone who has long been schooled in the concepts that there are certain colours that everyone perceives as "strong" or "relaxing" or "energetic", etc., it's a bit of a process of unlearning. or at least, learning that what you might have accepted as gospel before was somewhat limited.

it's certainly been il…

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…