Skip to main content

go to bell

oh bell canada. i thought you were getting better. well, i don't know if i thought your customer service was getting better, but i at least thought that you were doing some good stuff with the cause of mental health, which would help divert people from your shitty customer service. anything that works, right?

but just a week after your annual "let's talk" awareness-fest, one of your employees decides to lash out at a customer via email, calling her a "bitch" and a "slut". her offense? giving said employee a less than perfect rating on a customer satisfaction survey after he was unable to help her. she didn't even say he gave her bad service, and left a comment that it wasn't his fault that her overall experience wasn't satisfying.

one would hope that this isn't typical behaviour of bell canada's employees. i got called a liar during my dispute with them, but only when i called them. no one ever thought to contact me proactively to call me names. [well, it's possible they did. i received a couple of abusive messages on my voice mail, which i attributed to the fact that i'd recently been torturing sleazy scam callers from "microsoft". the timing still makes me think the scammers were the most likely culprits, but now that i know bell likes to do that too, i'll never be certain.]

i've noticed that a lot of the reactions to this incident have focused on the fact that the employee was in north africa, touching off a lot of anger that many jobs have been "offshored" to areas where employees are cheaper. i don't think that's quite fair. i've personally been treated rudely by all sorts of bell employees, some of whom were clearly canadian. true, i haven't heard of any of them contacting a customer to call them a "slut", but the fact is that with the massive number of complaints against them, it's impossible that all the abuse is coming from one ill-tempered guy in morocco.

furthermore, talking about the problem as if it's just a problem with cheap employees in other countries masks the greater problem: bell canada is letting this survey information pass directly to the employees being evaluated, employees who have access to all a customer's personal information, like their email, their phone numbers and their home address. and apparently they have no concept of why that might be a bad idea. surely, no employee in history has taken a bad evaluation personally, right?

hey bell: let's talk about the mental health problems you're causing for your customers.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…