Skip to main content

making faces :: journey to the heart of light

i'll never understand why some brands launch things so quietly. yves st. laurent snuck in a whole new range of blushes without so much as a ripple, it seems, and that is such a disservice. for starters, it seems that these new blushes, dubbed both "blush volupté" and "heart of light" are replacing their existing powder blushes, which is something i would like to have known before they started disappearing on me. i also would have liked a little more fanfare surrounding the introduction of these new shades in a new formula.

now, i've always liked ysl powder blushes. they've never been the highest profile items in their collection, but yves has a lot of hidden gems and the new "heart of light" blushes look to fall into the same category. trusting my instincts, when i saw that they were available [which is a while ago now], i immediately ordered one to try out. there are a number of cooler pinks that grabbed my attention, however, i decided to go a little out of my comfort zone and order something that looked more like an orange-coral, shade #6, "passionée".


as it turns out "passionée" is a more natural shade than it appears on the sephora web site, with less apricot and more warm pink tones. it's much less warm than i expected, while still being generally warm overall. like all the "heart of light" blushes, it has an outer "ring" in a deeper shade with an inner "heart" [actually a square, which isn't a good shape for a heart at all] at the centre. like the new eye shadow palettes that debuted this year, the pattern debossed on the powder is inspired by yves st/ laurent's iconic "mondrian dress". the blushes are the same size as the shadow palettes, which is convenient for storage, but means that it can be difficult to pick the two shades up separately. it's certainly easiest to swirl a brush around and pick up both colours, however it's also relatively easy to stick to the sides and pick up only the deeper colour. if you want the central colour only, you'll have to use a smaller brush and execute some patience. that said, the most interesting and beautiful results come from the combination of the two shades.

l to r :: outer shade, inner shade, blended




the outer shade is an almost matte coral with a lot of pink to it. the inner shade is a shimmery light peach. combined, they make something that is rich in colour, but has a healthy sheen, which means that it serves as a blush and highlighter in one. something that everyone should know before diving in is that these blushes swatch terribly. no matter what you use, the colour payoff looks piss-poor and will give you a horrible impression. applied, there's pretty intense colour [use caution]. in that way, they reminded me of the texture of guerlain's "rose aux joues" blushes. which were great in use but similarly difficult to swatch.


because it is overall a more pink-coral, there are a lot of shades that come close to "passionée", which was my one slight disappointment when i tried it. hourglass "luminous flush" is brighter and more shimmery. nars "deep throat" is softer, cooler and more subtle. that said, despite having some close cousins, i've been reaching for this shade an almost indecent amount, because i love the balance of colour and finish, which is as good as any i've seen.

l to r :: hourglass luminous flush, passionée blended, nars deep throat

the "heart of light" blush is available in nine shades. i've now had the opportunity to look at them all in person and there is a good range from warm to cool. there are more light than dark shades [the line lacks an intense brick or plum shade], but the colour payoff you can achieve is pretty intense with what's available. the formula is silky and will disguise pores and unevenness, obviating the need for a finishing powder. the product lasts extremely well on me and doesn't tend to fade much.

here's a look at the blush in action. what you're seeing here is a fairly light application, which should give you an idea of the intensity the blush is capable of achieving. it doesn't become especially powdery when built up, either, but buffs nicely into the skin while offering plenty of pigment.




products used

base ::
hourglass mineral veil primer
urban decay naked skin "1.0
dior star concealer "010"
mac paint pot "painterly"
mac prep & prime finishing powder

eyes ::
nars e/s duo "tropical princess" [icy lilac and acid green chartreuse]
le metier de beauté e/s "corinthian" [shimmery pink taupe]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "smoke" [cool charcoal grey]
guerlain cils d'enfer mascara

cheeks ::
yves st. laurent blush volupté "passionée" [warm coral pink]

lips ::
bite beauty deconstructed rose l/s "crimson"*

*suggested alternates :: crimson =  rouge d'armani 402

do i recommend the new "heart of light" blushes? absolutely. unreservedly. highly. i'll miss the older shades, but these new ones have won me over. over time, i expect that the range of shades will expand a little, which will fill out the one area which seems wanting with this new collection. don't believe the lack of hype: these are stunning. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …