Skip to main content

making faces :: fade to grey

ah, november... halloween has past, the leaves have grown sparse and darkness falls so early. it's a month of feeble light and steely skies as we creep towards the winter solstice once again. i've often expressed a dislike for gloomy november, but i'm finding this year that it's been pleasant enough, if you can get over the perpetual cloud cover. nice walking weather, even. so i've tried to re-imagine the month as the natural transition between the fiery displays of fall and the cosy darkness of the december holidays. as such, the palette of november, it seems to me, would be dominated by greys, cloud tones and smoke, the cool silvery-taupe of bark from bare trees, the rusted brown and dirty gold of the last leaves of the season. it isn't the sort of thing that would necessarily catch the eye, but there's still beauty to be found in it.

giorgio armani tagged their fall 2014 collection "fade to grey", a clear reference to the new wave song, which was actually remixed/ deconstructed [along with some other 80s tracks] for the armani runway show at milan fashion week. their fall makeup collection bore the same name, but made such a fleeting appearance that i didn't even have time to think of what i wanted. the centrepiece of the collection was a silver and gold palette, exquisite to look at [see it here and here], but which i'd decided against, since i thought i could approximate it with shades i already owned. i was somewhat interested in the lipsticks that came with the collection, but they appear to have been whisked away...

nonetheless, the name "fade to grey" did inspire me, because i find that the original song carries a certain subdued melancholy that many electronic pop tracks from that era have. it is cold but not hard-edged. rather like november.



so with that in mind, i decided to do a look inspired partly by my new ideas about november and partly by armani's collection...

 


products used

the base ::
nuxe bio bb cream "light"
urban decay naked skin foundation "1.0"
dior star concealer "010"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
armani eyes to kill e/s #4 "pulp fiction" [dirty, warmed silver]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "golden rhea" [light gold]
le metier de beauté e/s "axiom" [golden umber]*
le metier de beauté e/s "genre" [stormy graphite grey]*
inglot e/s "351"
urban decay 24/7 e/l "zero" [soft black]
guerlain cils d'enfer mascara

the cheeks ::
nars blush "sin" [plum with gold shimmer]

the lips ::
rouge d'armani sheer l/s #614 "belladonna"*

*suggested alternates :: axiom = extremely difficult to match... armani eyes to kill #5 [gold blitz] is somewhat similar, but much more metallic looking, while nars fez is warmer and browner; genre = urban decay gunmetal [darker]; belladonna = another very difficult one... mac viva glam rihanna 2 is much darker and browner, but it's really the closest thing that i can think of.

for the look, i used the lighter "golden rhea" on the inner part of my eyes and "pulp fiction" on the outer two-thirds. "axiom" was just used to blend the two shades together. on a lot of people, "pulp fiction" pulls more taupe, but on me, it's reliably silvery. i wanted my eyes to have a little more definition on the outer corners, so i added "genre".

these photos honestly aren't great because the november light makes them look kind of faded [particularly the lipstick, which looks more like the images in the original review linked above]. i suppose these are the perils of working hand in hand with november.

Comments

Thank you for introducing me to a wonderful song! I love new wave pop. It's like the saddest of parties. I also love your pairing of a cool gray eye and a warm nude lip. And I swear the entire internet has been conspiring to make me buy Sin this fall...
Kate MacDonald said…
You must Sin! Seriously, it's a perfect blush for Fall.

And I'm always happy to spread musical love. I find that such music is a perfect November soundtrack- cold and a bit sad- but I still love it.

I love your new profile pic, btw.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …