Skip to main content

making faces :: berry picking

leaves are turning! gusts of chill air are arriving! evening is longer than daytime! i get excited just typing those things. it helps that, compared to last year, the first part of autumn as been glorious. the temperature has been slowly creeping downward [although we did have a shocking run of heat last week], making it comfortable to wear light layers during the day and a jacket at night. my toes are getting ready to hibernate in boots and my lips are lusting after delicious berries and plums like at no other time of the year.

i always love a deep lip, from classically sophisticated to outright vamp and i'll wear them pretty much any time i want, but there is something to the pairing of such shades with the golden autumn light, just as bold, juicy shades come into their own on the most brilliant summer days. as a result, when this time of year rolls around, i'm magnetically drawn to try any new lipstick that has "berry" in its name or description, the fuller and richer the coverage the better.

you might recall that earlier this year, i finally got around to trying givenchy's le rouge formula for the first time. i'd passed on the opportunity to try them earlier, because none of the colours seemed unique, but having tried one, i knew i was going to keep my eye out for more. i got lucky in that they added more new shades, including one promisingly named "framboise velours", which translates to "raspberry velvet". that sounds like so many thrilling things- an edwardian gown, a quietly deadly cocktail and, yes, a kick-ass lipstick colour.



in fact, it absolutely lives up to that name. the finish is velvety smooth and almost matte [more so, i thought, that rouge égerie] with just a little lustre. and the colour is a perfect raspberry, a reddish deep pink with a slightly muted, dusty quality to it. it wears comfortably and lasts a good long time. as it fades, it leaves a light stain, or it can be applied and blotted to achieve that effect from the outset. it's a quick, single-pass application for full colour payoff, since it goes on very saturated and completely evenly.

   
framboise velours
framboise velours
there are a lot of shades out there, which is something i knew when i purchased it, but i find that the dustiness i mentioned above makes this one look a little different. it's just a wee bit greyer than other shades that are close to it and therefore quite distinctive. bite "crimson" is deeper and a little redder. guerlain "gladys" is brighter, pinker and shimmery.

l to r :: bite crimson [l.e.], frmaboise velours, guerlain gladys
i think that "framboise velours" would be an excellent option for people who are drawn to shades like "gladys", but who are worried that they might be too loud. for me, this is a shade that i find a little easier to pull off in more conservative settings, when i don't necessarily want to stand out, like in police lineups.

this shade lends itself to pretty simple makeup, since it's strong enough to carry a look on its own. i've been favouring neutral eyes with the same sort of greyish cast as the lipstick and a deep pink or berry shade on the cheeks. to whit:

 


products used

the base ::
ysl teint touche éclat foundation "b10"
dior star concealer "01"
mac paint pot "painterly"
mac fluidline brow gel "deep dark brunette"

the eyes ::
mac e/s "my fantasy" [light grey-gold]
mac e/s "fall in lust" [misty taupe]
mac e/s "dance in the dark" [sooty greenish grey with gold shimmer]
mac e/s "rising passions" [black brown]
gosh pen liner "brown"
guerlain cils d'enfer maxi lash mascara

the cheeks ::
marc jacobs blush "tantalizing" [deep cool raspberry]

the lips ::
givenchy le rouge l/s "framboise velours"

the givenchy line is available exclusively through sephora, which is where i purchased mine. weirdly, there are two versions of the shade: a regular version, which appears to be part of the permanent assortment and costs $38cad; and a limited edition version in a burgundy [rather than black] case, which costs $5 more. i don't get hugely excited about limited packaging, so i opted for the former, but both are still available on sephora's [canadian] web site as of today.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

white trash

yes, my lovelies, i have returned from the dead, at least for the time it takes me to write this post. this is not just another piece of observational drivel about how i haven't been taking care of the blog lately, although i clearly haven't. on that front, though, the principal cause of my absence has actually been due to me trying to get another, somewhat related project, off the ground. unfortunately, that project has met with some frustrating delays which means that anyone who follows this blog [perhaps there are still a few of you who haven't entirely given up] would understandably be left with the impression that i'd simply forsaken more like space to marvel at the complexity of my own belly button lint. [it's possible you had that impression even before i disappeared.]

ok, enough with that. i have a subject i wanted to discuss with you, in the sense that i will want and encourage you to respond with questions, concerns and criticism in the comments or by em…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [summer edition]

this may seem like an odd time to think about summer, but not to think about coolness. it can be hard to wrap your head around the idea that summer is considered "cool" in colour analysis terms and, in my opinion, reads as the coolest of the cool, because everything in it is touched with the same chilly grey. winter may have the coldest colours, but its palette is so vivid that it distracts the eye. everything in summer is fresh and misty, like the morning sky before the sun breaks through. in my original post on the season, i compared it to monet's paintings of waterlilies at his garden in giverny and, if i do say so, i think that's an apt characterisation.

finding lip colours touched with summer grey and blue is, as you might expect, kind of tricky. the cosmetic world seems obsessed with bringing warmth, which doesn't recognise that some complexions don't support it well. [also, different complexions support different kinds of warmth, but that's another…

i agree, smedley [or, smokers totally saved our planet in 1983]

so this conversation happened [via text, so i have evidence and possibly so does the canadian government and the nsa].

dom and i were trying to settle our mutual nerves about tomorrow night's conversion screening, remembering that we've made a fine little film that people should see. which is just about exactly what dom had said when i responded thusly:

me :: i agree smedley. [pauses for a moment] did you get that here?

dom :: no?

me :: the aliens who were looking at earth and then decided it wasn't worth bothering with because people smoked even though it was bad for them?
come to think of it, that might mean that smokers prevented an alien invasion in the seventies.

dom :: what ?!?!?

me :: i've had wine and very little food. [pause] but the alien thing was real. [pause.] well, real on tv.

dom :: please eat something.

of course, i was wrong. the ad in question ran in 1983. this is the part where i would triumphantly embed the ad from youtube, except that the governmen…