Skip to main content

making faces :: tripling down

part of me wishes that i'd just been all piggy and grabbed all the hourglass ambient lighting blushes the day they came out, however i take great pains to ensure that that part of me is never allowed near the credit cards.

as a result, i'm reviewing these as i get them, at a measured pace, although i have to say that every new one that i bring home is just making me eager for more. most recently [which i have to admit wasn't all that recently now], i brought home "diffused heat", which is a supposed to be a combination of a warm poppy red with the "diffused light" ambient lighting powder.

some of you might recall that "diffused light" was my favourite of the ambient lighting powders. there is something about it's sainty white, warmed by just a hint of cheery yellow that makes my heart flutter and, more to the point, makes my complexion nearly perfect. it was a deliberate choice on my part to hold off on "diffused heat", because i didn't see any way that it could live up to the glory of its predecessor.

and it doesn't completely, but that isn't to say that i don't love it, more just an indication of how glorious the original is.

HOW NICE IS IT? CONTINUE READING...



this is the first time that i've received one of the blushes that has a clear predominance of ambient lighting powder in its mix. each unit will be different- such is the nature of the beast- but thus far mine have leaned toward the blush-heavy side. despite this, i still had no problem getting a great deal of pigment from the blush, so i think that the overall colour will likely end up more or less the same, no matter what your individual pan looks like.

MY diffused heat
the colour in this case is a medium-bright peachy pink with a shimmery texture. that surprised me a little, because among the ambient lighting powders "diffused heat" is one of the least shimmery. only "ethereal light" is more matte. nonetheless, i wouldn't say that the shimmer is tremendously obvious on the face, where it smoothes into more of an overall glow. on my face, it pulls a little pinker when applied, but if your undertones are yellower than mine, i would expect that it would look more peach.

diffused heat
these blushes go on pretty light, but build remarkably well and blend well. that means that if you have too little, you can easily add more and if you accidentally apply too much, you won't have trouble toning it down. i find that it looks very natural even when applied fairly heavily, which i'll illustrate shortly.

my first thought in terms of comparisons was that it didn't seem all that different than "luminous flush", but seen side by side, it's clearly lighter and warmer. on my cheeks, "luminous flush" looks noticeably deeper, even when applied lightly. one thing that i would note is that the deeper and warmer your complexion, the less i think that you'll see a difference between these two.

l to r :: diffused heat, hourglass luminous flush
i continue to be impressed with the formula of these blushes. they kick up a bit more powder than i'd like [and i'd say that "diffused heat" is worse on that score than either of the other two that i've tried], which translates to waste, but there's still a generous amount per pan and, what's really important, it gives the same kind of luminous finish as the ambient lighting powders.

most exciting, hourglass will be launching a three-pan palette of blushes, as they have done for the ambient lighting powders [speaking of things i need to review here...], featuring two existing and one unique shade. from the existing line, "luminous flush" and "mood exposure" will be featured, plus a blush based on the "incandescent light" ambient lighting powder [available only in the palette]. i know i'm going to be bringing that home as soon as it rears its head.

now here's a quick look i put together featuring "diffused heat". to give a comparison, i applied it lightly on my left cheek [your right] and built it up a little more on the right cheek [your left]. both look natural, but i think that it gives a clear idea in the difference you can get. [well, you could actually build it up more than what i have here, but i only have two cheeks to work with. or that i'm willing to work with.]




products used

the base ::
yves st. laurent teint touche éclat foundation "b10"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"
mac prep and prime finishing powder [side note: i have no idea what they did to this powder between now and the last time i bought it, but it now smells terrible. vaguely latex-like. gross.]

the eyes ::
nars e/s duo "grand palais" [pink taupe, warm rose]
illamasqua precision gel liner
ysl effet faux cils mascara "noir radical"

the cheeks ::
hourglass ambient lighting blush "diffused heat" [pink apricot]

the lips ::
nars satin lip pencil "golshan" [deep brick red]

the bottom line here? thus far, i think that you'd be satisfied with any choice from the hourglass blush selection. this one may differ substantially from the ambient lighting powder on which it's based, but it's still an exquisite blush.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

making faces :: i could maybe not buy this one thing

i've been into makeup on some level for a long time- much longer than i've been writing about it, for certain. even as a young woman, i loved the feeling of i got from applying a deep-hued lipstick and some mascara. it took years for me to figure out eyeshadow, and even longer for me to appreciate blush. but at this point, i think we can agree that i'm pretty much into the whole gamut. [except liquid and super-matte lipsticks, and most very sparkly eyeshadows. but that's because they're painful for me to wear.]

the thing about spending a long time collecting and holding onto just about everything is that you accumulate quite a stash. lately, i'm trying to force myself to think about what i already have before laying down money for something new. most recently, i found myself drawn to the modern renaissance palette from anastasia. me and a lot of people. by the time i started thinking about it, it was already sold out in my local sephora and online. i signed up…

...and my cup size is none of your damn business

this story, about a man who got a female coworker to trade email accounts with him for two weeks to see if he could see a difference in customer reactions, has been making the rounds on social media and beyond in the last week or so. earlier today, i posted it on my personal facebook page about it, and realised that i had a lot more that i wanted to share than made sense for a facebook post. so i've come here to rant.

a couple of things to start:

1. i've had some really good job experiences in my life. i'm both lucky and unlucky that the best of them came early on, but even in more recent years, i worked at a couple of places that treated workers, all workers, with respect. that respect can be expressed in different ways, but believe me, you know it when it's there. so i want to make it clear that #notallworkplaces fit the pattern i'm about to describe.

2. i am really, really, really grateful to martin r. schneider, who thought up and did this experiment, not just …