Skip to main content

making faces :: better late than never?

regret: don't play that game
now that it's officially summer, i'm too late to review any spring collection items, right?

but it's really hard for me to let some of them pass me by, because as i think about the things i've passed up, i start to wonder  if i'm missing out on something i would really love. something limited edition. that's how they get you.

so i belatedly caved in to my fascination with guerlain's spring rouge automatique lipsticks and picked up "attrape coeur". this has nothing to do with the eyeshadow palette of the same name that was part of last year's spring collection, although now that i think about it, the two would look nice together.

"attrape coeur" the lipstick is a bright, juicy coral with a strong pink undertone. i have to beware of corals, because ones that are too orange make me look like hot death. this one, however, has now joined the ranks of my very favourite coral tones, ones that i can wear without fear. i find that the cooler tone of my lips brings out more of the pink [you can see the difference between the swatch on my arm, which is warmer, and the close up on my lips.] it's bright, but not tremendously so, especially given that it's quite glossy, a finish which reflects light, and not matte, which absorbs light.
attrape coeur
attrape coeur
given that my window of corals is rather narrow, it's not surprising that "attrape coeur" is somewhat similar to my other two favourite pink-toned corals. dior "montmartre" is deeper and redder. lancôme "corset" is deeper and more orange. ["corset" is as orange as i can go without running into problems.] since both of those have satin/ matte finishes, they appear even deeper than they are. i didn't do a side-by-side comparison, but guerlain "reflex" is pinker, brighter and has more white in its base.

l to r :: dior montmartre, attrape coeur, lancome corset

i really like the rouge automatique formula, but i've found that the last few limited releases haven't been quite as good as the shades from the permanent collection. "attrape coeur" doesn't emphasise my lip lines, unlike the automatiques from the holiday collection [as pretty as they are], but i did find the wear time to be a little less than what i'd experienced with the original automatique formula. i would say that the colour can last up to four hours, but during that time, there's significant fading. although you won't get the dreaded "ring of shame" around the outside of the lips, the wear can get a little patchy, especially if your lips are dry. from more of a distance, though, it looks like quite a pretty stain, so how much you like it worn over time is going to depend on how important these details are to you. the formula isn't drying, but i would recommend treating your lips with a bit of balm before applying, since it will help the colour wear more evenly.

it's an absolutely wonderful shade for summer- bright and cheery but not neon, which can be intimidating for some people. here's an example of what i mean:




products used

the base ::
hourglass mineral veil primer
mac paint pot "painterly"
ysl teint touche éclat foundation "beige 10"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac prep and prime finishing powder

the eyes ::
armani neo-black palette e/s #1 [sparkling dirty champagne]*
armani e/s palette "medusa" [soft grass green, medium olive]
inglot e/s "351" [matte ivory]
ysl effet faux cils mascara "noir radical"

the cheeks ::
armani neo-black palette blush [deep beige]*
nars blush "boys don't cry" [bright coral red]*
hourglass ambient lighting powder "diffused light" [beight yellowed white]

the lips ::
guerlain rouge automatique l/s "attrape coeur" [juicy pink melon]

suggested alternates :: armani neo-black #1 = armani "beige nudo" [warmer]; armani neo-black blush = nars douceur; nars boys don't cry = mac salsarose [deeper, pinker] or dior "new red" [considerably softer/ lighter, but since this look features a light application, it might be better for the purposes of recreating what you see here]

although attrape coeur is limited, it's still available at many guerlain counters and online.

the photo at the top of this page is taken from an hilarious and thought-provoking series of photographs called "in extremis: bodies without regret" by sandro giordano. see more here.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…