Skip to main content

making faces :: stop and smell and wear the roses

a rose by any other name...
i'm very happy to see that canadian upstarts bite beauty are getting more and more great press as their releases have been increasing. they are focused on the lips, on your lips and on making them healthier, softer and prettier. i've already fallen for their luminous creme lipsticks and i'm fond of their light, sheer glosses. i've actually missed a few of their other products, like their cult favourite matte lip pencils and their new lip mask, which is garnering rave reviews, but recently i found something that i just couldn't resist.

bite has created four new lipsticks in a new formula called "deconstructed rose". along with a coffret of lip glosses bearing the same name, the collection is supposed to highlight the rose in all its varieties. the glosses run the gamut from very sheer to quite saturated, but the lipsticks are all pigment powerhouses. i was drawn to one [the deepest one, unsurprisingly] called "crimson", because i was on the hunt for a deep pink shade that didn't pull fuchsia. you'd be surprised how difficult that is to find.

first up, as you may have guessed from that description, "crimson" isn't crimson, or anything like what i'd associate with that description. crimson is a vibrant red, usually cooler-toned, but something altogether brighter than what we have here. it's described on the sephora web site as "muted dark  purple", which is completely wrong. "crimson" the lipstick is a deep, wild rose pink. it definitely has some berry tones to it, without pulling purple, the way cooler berry shades often do. although it's bright, it lacks the high wattage impact of colours that lean more towards fuchsia, without moving too much into plum red territory.

crimson
crimson
there are shades which are similar and how much the distinctions mean to you will probably be dictated by how much you love and wear this kind of shade. i'm a huge fan, so the subtle differences mean a lot to me. rouge d'armani #402 is the closest in my collection, but on me it is noticeably redder and brighter, something which i find more noticeable on the lips than swatched on my hand. [you can be the judge. there's a look here with #402.] guerlain "gigolo" is darker, more berry. guerlain "madame batifole", which i initially thought would be closest, is not so close after all. it's lighter and pinker by quite a bit.

l to r :: rouge d'armani 402, crimson, guerlain gigolo, guerlain madame batifole [l.e.]
the deconstructed rose lipsticks cost $4cad more than regular bite lipsticks and boast and even more luxurious formula. it still uses the food grade ingredients and has the added benefits of rose otto essential oil. rose oils of all sorts are tremendous for softening and toning the skin. the question is: does the formula differ significantly from the regular luminous creme lipsticks? the answer: yes, although not greatly.





i already love the luscious feeling of the luminous creme formula and deconstructed rose retains that. it is still luxuriously creamy, hydrating on lips and perfectly even in application. where deconstructed rose justifies its higher price is in lasting power and in a slightly more moisturising feel. left to its own devices, i find that "crimson" lasts for hours on me, whereas the luminous creme lipsticks tend to fade moderately quickly. there is a nice stain that remains afterward as well. eating or drinking something warm will make the wear uneven, so you'll want to touch up after those activities. when you're doing so, i recommend removing your lipstick and reapplying completely. it's quick, since one pass is all you need for complete coverage and when i 'cheated' and just dabbed on a little extra colour after a meal, i found that there was slight but noticeable feathering along my top lip shortly after. the oils in food will often cause this to happen with creamier formulas and while its far from the worst i've seen, it was enough to give a slightly blurred effect i didn't care for.

one point that has come up repeatedly in reviews i've seen is the scent. regular bite lipsticks have a sweet herbal scent- i liken it to verbena- and faint taste that fades quickly. the deconstructed rose lipsticks use rose geranium oil, which has slight anesthetic and astringent properties. the scent is noticeably strong and quite distinctive. if you've smelled rose geranium before, you'll recognise it immediately. there is also a taste, much like rose candies. it's sweet and floral without being sickly. myself, i really like both the scent and taste, but if you're sensitive to such things, you can write this formula off entirely. it is strong compared to other lipstick scents and many find it peculiar. furthermore, it never entirely fades. i could still smell it a little when i removed the lipstick hours later. it's a matter of personal preference, but i'd be remiss if i didn't mention it.

the bottom line? i'm absolutely in love with this colour and formula and i wish that bite would bring out more colours. of the four that they've released, i think that i could wear three, however "crimson" was the one that really bowled me over. with the caveat that the scent may perturb some people, i can't come up with a reason not to love this. it feels so wonderful on the lips, wears well and actually seems to leave lips feeling better after wear. the pigmentation is stellar and quite dramatic without being shocking. [if you want something less bold, two of the four shades are softer.]

finally, here's a look at the shade in action. i also took this opportunity to play around using some favourite cream shadows as a base to emphasise similar colours. i applied "celeste" on the lids and "diapason" in the crease and then layered the other shadows over them. i loved the effect, which ironically looked a little lighter than just the cream shadows on their own, since the powders served to diffuse the colour a little.





products used

the base ::
hourglass mineral veil primer
lise watier eye shadow base
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
yves st. laurent teint touche éclat foundation "beige 10"

the eyes ::
dior mono matte fusion cream e/s "celeste" [icy matte violet base]
chanel illusion d'ombre cream e/s "diapason" [plum with purple/ blue shimmer]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "lilac reef currasow" [light, soft violet]
rouge bunny e/s "solstice halcyon" [browned mauve]
le metier de beauté e/s "fire lily" [shimmery warm cranberry]
mac e/s "vanilla" [peachy highlight]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "invasion" [dark teal]
ysl effet faux cils mascara "noir radical"

the cheeks ::
mac blush "azalea" [bright hot pink with red shimmer]
bobbi brown highlighter "porcelain pearl"

the lips ::
bite beauty deconstructed rose l/s "crimson" [deep rose pink]

bite beauty is available exclusively through sephora, who have shown themselves to be a great partner for the brand. the deconstructed rose shades are limited edition. and in case you were wondering, that photo above is a rose geranium, not a rose.

Comments

Anonymous said…
crimson looks beautiful, right up my alley. also like the look you did! / Claire xxx
Kate MacDonald said…
Thanks Claire! This is a really lovely shade and while I don't know if anything is truly universal, I do think that this would look great on the vast majority of complexions. Wish they would make this permanent!

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [winter edition]

it seems oddly canadian to have two posts in a row about winter/ cold/ snow, but they're obviously unrelated. after all, for most people winter is a season, but in colour analysis terms, winter is part of what you are, an effect of the different wavelengths that comprise the physical part of the thing known as "you". this might be getting a little heady for a post about lipstick. moving on...

if you've perused the other entries in this series without finding something that really spoke to you [figuratively- lipsticks shouldn't actually speak to you- get help], you may belong in one of the winter seasons. winter, like summer, is cool in tone; like spring, it is saturated; like autumn, it is dark. that combination of elements creates a colour palette [or three] that reads as very "strong" to most. and on people who aren't part of the winter group, such a palette would look severe. the point of finding a palette that reads "correctly" on you…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…