Skip to main content

eat the cup :: it. is. coming.

olà! it's the thirtieth of may, which means that we're only two short weeks from the beginning of me turning into a rather irritatingly single-minded soccer fan.

if you've been checking out my bloggy bits for a while, you know that i've developed a distinctive way of enjoying the world cup every four years, which is that i use the opportunity to learn as much as i can about the cuisine of participating nations by cooking from the traditional menus of the victorious countries. and this year will be no different. this will actually mark the third time that i've conducted this culinary experiment and it brings with it a slew of new challenges.

first and most importantly, i'm going to have to think more about scheduling. the previous tournaments in germany and south africa allowed me to browse through the day's winners to come up with a dish, or a variety of dishes, that served as an alimentary summary of what had taken place. this year, the cup will take place in brazil, which means that, for the first time in eat the cup history, the games will be happening at night for me. so i'm basically stuck recapping the day before [assuming that i'm on the ball enough to cook a cup-related meal every night, which doesn't happen often].

the change in time zone also means that i have no excuse to implement my rule that you can drink alcohol at any time of day, as long as there's a cup game on. i mean, it still counts. it just can't be used to justify drinking guinness at eight in the morning like it was last time.

the second challenge is that, predictably, there are a lot of countries participating who have been in one or both of the tournaments where i've cooked before. that means that i'm going to have to be careful not to repeat myself in cooking or content through the series of blog posts. that means that i'm going to have to do a review of what i did in 2010 and 2006 and come up with a new spin.

but the nice thing is that i have another couple of weeks to build up my excitement and figure out what i'm going to do during the big event.

if you're not sure what i'm talking about here, please feel free to check out:

eat the cup 2010
eat the cup 2006

thanks to dom for this year's awesome eat the cup logo!

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …