Skip to main content

making faces :: you got autumn in my spring!

we're still stuck in weather that's more reminiscent of late october than late april here, with a lot of grey days, cool winds and temperatures that struggle to reach that double-digit threshold. perhaps that's why i was so drawn to one of yves st. laurent's new glossy stains, introduced with their spring collection, which has a decidedly autumnal bent. it's also possible that i just love the opportunity to buy a mice burgundy lip product at any time of year and am happy that yves gave me the excuse to insist that's it's really in keeping with spring.

in the fashion world, a number of writers have noted that colours more traditionally associated with fall collections found a place on runways for spring 2014, so it shouldn't be surprising that there is some of that reflected in cosmetics. specifically, it's reflected in the new glossy stain called "bourgogne artistique", also known as #33. it's a deep, ruby red that looks a little deeper on the lips than on the skin, as you can see. like other glossy stains, the formula has an ever-so-slight translucency, so while there's plenty of colour, it's like looking at stained glass [or a glass of burgundy wine? -ed.], in that it's not opaque.

strangely, though, as vampy as the colour might look at first blush, there is something that honestly makes me think of this as more of a "springtime vamp". it's dark, but it's also bright, both swatched and [a little less evidently] on the lips. it lacks the earthier, browner tones of the more autumnal shades. the glassy finish also reinforces this, since reflected light is something that's associated with the warmer [in theory], sunnier [again, in theory] seasons.

bourgogne artistique
the unique glossy stain formula alone makes this shade tricky to match and, when i looked in my extensive collection, i couldn't really find something that similar. the closest was chanel "crushed cherry" gloss, which looks a lot closer swatched than it does on the lips. "crushed cherry" is cooler and, on first application, looks a little darker than "bourgogne artistique". applied, though, the former is more of a true gloss and fades fairly quickly, while the latter hangs on for hours.

i also swatched rouge d'armani #408 ["rosewood red"], which is a fall shade that is a little short of opaque, but you can see that it's browner and more muted, which goes to my point about "bourgogne artistique" being spring-like in defiance of its dark appearance.

l to r :: chanel crushed cherry, bourgogne artistique, rouge d'armani 408

some people may not feel comfortable with something so deep in the spring and to them i say: buy it anyway and save it for fall. or wear it as a light stain [very easier with this formula] so that it's not so intimidating. it is absolutely worth the investment.

here's a look at "bourgogne artistique" in action. i would happily tell you what else i'm wearing, but i can't remember it for the life of me. perhaps the type of colour will inspire you? no? i'm a failure...





at the same time, i picked up my very first yves st. laurent nail polish, also part of the spring collection, a cool, bright pink called "rose scabiosa". i've included a couple of photos for you, but they're not the best. more just to give you an idea of the colour, which reminded me of notoriously "difficult" pinks like mac "st. germain" that are very cool in tone and have a lot of white in their base. "rose scabiosa" is less jarring than the brightest of those, since the white in the base is a little softer, and, well, it's a nail polish, which means that it's not sitting right there in the middle of your face distracting everyone.



i very much liked the colour, which is good because the formula was a little tricky for me to work with. you can see in the photos that there is some bubbling on the nail. this happened the first time that i applied it. the second time, i was more patient and extremely careful to let my coats dry completely before applying the next one. both times i wore it, the application on the first coat was streaky, but when i made sure that the first was absolutely dry before proceeding, i did find that the second coat levelled out nicely. working too quickly meant that i had to use a third coat, since the stickiness seemed to cause the streaks to settle into one another. needless to say, i was much happier with the second time i wore this. i just forgot to take photos...

the entire yves st. laurent spring collection is decidedly a departure from pastels, moving into what seems like a modern take on a sultan's palace, a north african spice market or the like. there are purples and golds and different shades of red and the fiery edge of coral. it's not quite chanel's tropical spring look, but there are some common elements. i'm allergic to them, but the shades of rouge volupte lipstick with the collection are lovely. the two products i picked up are outstanding. while i felt that the more hyped items- the eye shadow palette and the blush- were a little disappointing, there are some real gems that warrant a purchase.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …