Skip to main content

making faces :: another voluptuous colour adventure

changing up your look: wrong
sometimes, you just want to play around with colour. you want to do something with your face that's out of the ordinary and memorable, but that falls short of a full facial tattoo, because that, my friends, is a serious commitment. that's when i start reaching for my pigments. loose shadows tend to be easier to build up to a fully saturated colour, especially through the use of a sticky base or spray. [i use mac's setting spray directly on my brushes.] this makes for a great way to add some spice to your appearance that would require lasers to remove. [at least it shouldn't. if it does, you're doing it wrong.]

the other day, i thought to try out the slightly odd colour combination of silver and chartreuse. i'm not sure why it came to me, i just thought it sounded like a fun idea. i think that part of the decision was that i had been wanting to use both mac's "true chartreuse" pigment and "platinum" pigment for a while. the former lives up to its name, being a satiny, acid yellow-green. the latter is a foil-like metallic silver with a bright undertone. i wasn't sure that they'd go together and, despite a little hesitation in the blending process [they really didn't want to merge], i find that they do. furthermore, a combination this dialled up doesn't require much in the way of accessorizing. just a thin line of urban decay "smoke" along the upper lash lines and a soft highlight colour. [i used the limited edition mac shade "next to nothing", but the permanent shade "vanilla" would work, as would nars "edie".] and mascara. never forget mascara.

with such a strong look up top, i wanted to make everything else softer. also, i find that combining cool colours with a cold metallic shade like "platinum" ages me instantly, so i wanted something to bring a little warmth. that comes in the form of nars blush in "torrid", a soft apricot shade that's not so warm that it can't work on neutral-cool complexions and that builds up nicely to the intensity you want. i also added hourglass "diffused light" for a bright, ray of morning sun effect on my cheeks. this absolutely solved the 'cold metal' problem, because it keeps things from looking heavy or overly chilly. the longer i play around with makeup and colours, the more i realise that too cold is as bad on me as too hot [which i always knew was bad].

 
 

i finished things off with another from yves st. laurent's new line of glosses, the "gloss volupte" formula. this one is a very soft pink-peach called "corail trapeze". this is one of the creamier shades, meaning that it has virtually no shimmer in it. it's a very 'sweetheart' kind of colour- soft and delicate and perfectly balanced between cool and warm. swatched thickly, it looks like an orange creamsicle kind of colour, not dissimilar to mac's "lychee luxe". however, it sheers out on the lips and looks much pinker than i first thought. i'm surprised at how much i like this colour, because it's not the sort of thing that i normally go for. used with a softer eye, i think it would be underwhelming on me [although those with more delicate colouring could wear it that way], but as it is, it's a wonderful balance for a bold eye.

the lasting power on "corail trapeze" was noticeably less than "rose orfevre". i'm not surprised, since lip colours with shimmer often outlast creamy ones. it lasted a decent amount of time, but certainly couldn't survive a meal or even a cup of coffee without losing nearly all its pigment. the formula feels very light and nicely moisturizing, though, which means i don't mind reapplying. i'd mind even less if it weren't for the rancid fig smell that ysl insists on adding to their volupte products. please yves, please stop.

although you might expect that this was another "night on the town" look, i actually didn't end up doing too much this day. sometimes, it's just fun to play around and plan for a time when such a look could be repeated. and it will be. you just never know when...

in case you're wondering, i am planning a "wrap up" post with swatches of the samples of gloss volupte that i received. in the meantime, i'm having fun sharing how i've used them, because sometimes just writing straight reviews isn't enough fun for me. and this blog is entirely about me. [also, i keep forgetting to do swatches, which is the real reason you haven't seen them yet.]

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …