Skip to main content

making faces :: the extremes of ellis

a few weeks ago [over a month ago -ed.], i promised a review of some new ellis faas products that i'd got my hands on. yeah, i ended that sentence with a preposition and i'm going to carry that knowledge to my grave, but it just felt better than saying "on which i've gotten my hands", which sounds retarded. and no, i don't mean retarded in the offensive, mentally challenged sense. i mean retarded in the "too stupid and slow to keep up" sense, which was always the sense with which it was employed [see what i did there?] in my youth. and all that is an extremely lengthy way of saying that this is the promised review of ellis faas products.

i picked up two shades from their web site: one of their new "hot lips" lipsticks in l403 and one of their creamy eyes shadows in e117.

the hot lips shades are a new formula, based on the existing "creamy lips" formula, but containing incredibly high levels of pigment in colours that venture well outside the "natural colours" realm of other ellis products. these are super-saturated, neon-bright and wild. there are a few shades that feel just a bit more natural [the higher the shade number, the more natural the colour], but the ones that will garner the most attention are those that are bold.



the one that i ordered, l403, is described as "bright fuchsia". yup, that's a pretty fine description. it's fully opaque with just a light application and offers an incredible pop of colour. it's a, intense, cool fuchsia-pink that lasts a long time on the lips and fades to a still-bright stain after a few hours. it can leave behind the ring of shame around the lips, but it depends largely on what you're doing. because it's quite creamy and doesn't ever dry to a true, lip cramping matte, you have the option of wiping it off and reapplying after a meal. the formula is most similar to the armani maestro liquid lip colour, in that it's very opaque, but doesn't become rigid and drying. i experienced some minimal feathering when i reapplied after a meal. my advice to avoid this would be to wipe your mouth very carefully and make sure that you don't have any residual oil around your lips. that's what causes the bleeding.

l403

l403 is deeper than most fuchsia shades in my collection and cooler as well. the closest one i found was mac "scandelicious", another liquid lipstick, which is not quite as opaque or as cool.

l to r :: l403, mac scandalicious [l.e.]
as for the eye shadow, e117, this was my first experience with an ellis faas shadow other than their "lights" formula of sparkly, metallic-finish products. all i can say is "more please". e117 is described as "mint green", but in truth it's a muted mint with a slight grey cast, more neutral than pastel and more adult as well. as someone who has trouble wearing brighter pastel shades, i love the fact that this one is "dialed down". in fact, all of the pastels from ellis faas seem to share this quality, which just makes me want to order more.

e117
the formula applies perfectly- even distribution and layers nicely, so you can go from a soft wash to opaque in two coats. you have enough time to blend with other shadows, but it does dry fairly quickly, so if you want to really mix colours, i'd recommend doing one eye at a time.

i didn't have a good comparison for the shade, which is like a foggy sage green. it's a unique colour in my collection and one that i can see getting a lot of use.

one of the great things about ellis faas shadows is that they work well used on their own, or as a base for other colours. i loved the idea of adding neutrals over this shade and here is the result.

 
 

that's chantecaille "basalt" brushed over e117 and illamasqua "wisdom" as a liner. i also used inglot "352" as a highlight shade. it's a quick look- i added mac "marine life" on the cheeks as both a blush and highlighter and guerlain "rouge sensuel" lipstick- that has some major impact. i find that the soft grey-green and soft coral-red go nicely together.

both of these products are available from the ellis faas web site. as far as i know, they are exclusive there, but the site ships worldwide, so you should be able to get hands on them, no matter where you're based.

the photo at the top of this post is taken from the ellis faas web site. 

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …