Skip to main content

making faces :: a valentine's look with ellis faas [and friends]

ok, first of all, i'm sorry about my expression in these pictures. i know i look like someone who's just been sentenced to jail time, but, really, i was in a good mood. for me at least. if my mood gets too good i can be dangerous, so it's better to keep a cap on things.

second, i decided to go ahead and post this without doing a complete review of the brand new product i'm featuring, because i did think that it fit with the overall theme of the day, although i was actually wearing it yesterday. i'll be posting a review of this and more from ellis faas in the very near future.

the new thing is, of course, one of ellis' new "hot lips" lipsticks. these new, creamy, satin-matte shades get away from the brand's emphasis on "human colours" [i.e., colours found already in the human body]. at least, i think it gets away from that. or dutch people look significantly different than i'd been led to believe.

each of the shades is very saturated and most are extremely bright [there are a couple of more muted colours hidden in there somewhere]. i personally opted for shade 304, "bright fuchsia". as you can see just after the break, it lives up to its name.



although the lips are a statement and a half by themselves, i wanted to add a little sparkle to a neutral eye, so i opted for one of the ellis faas "eye lights" to bring a little life to the inner part of my eyes. the rest is pretty basic, because, well, look at those lips. they don't need embellishment.




here's the complete breakdown:

the base ::
marcelle cc cream "light/ medium"
nars smudgeproof eye shadow base
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
urban decay naked skin foundation "1.0"
nars light reflecting setting powder

the eyes ::
ellis faas eye light "301" [sparkly light silver/ pewter]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "sweet dust sereima" [mauve grey]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "alabaster starling" [shimmery silver-white]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "smoke" [medium-deep grey]
hourglass film noir mascara

the cheeks ::
illamasqua velvet blush "peaked" [cool plum]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "radiant light" [soft bronze- used to contour]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "luminous light" [shimmery candlelight]

the lips ::
ellis faas hot lips l/s "bright fuchsia" [deep, cool fuchsia-pink]

that's it! pretty simple, really, which allows you to get on to good valentine's day stuff like the kind of thing that would get a warning slapped on this blog if i mentioned it.

the picture at the top of this post comes from the ellis faas web site, where you can order any of their products and experience their first-rate customer service.

Comments

Lani said…
Wow! I love the fuchsia lip on you and the eye light really does sparkle beautifully.
Kate MacDonald said…
Thanks Lani! If you're going to start anywhere with the brand, I'd recommend the eye lights. They are truly remarkable products.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …