Skip to main content

making faces :: spring's wood nymphs abound

i do this every year. we get a few days of nice-ish weather in february and i get all "we made it! it's over! spring has arrived!" and then i feel like it's a personal affront when the next week [which would be this week], temperatures dive once more and it's back to six layers of clothing if you want to make it to the corner alive. this condition has actually gotten worse since i've started following makeup collections, because spring's colours arrive on shelves in early february. dudes, do you even canada?

the fact is that we're likely to have a healthy coating of snow and ice until late march assuming that we're lucky. yes, there are parts of the country that are welcoming crocuses, but they're stuck at one end and most of us don't consider them fully canadian anyway. [ok, before my vancouver friends burn me at the stake, that's a joke. i joke. put down the pitchforks already.]

nonetheless, it is fun to wallow in whatever hints of spring we get.

we've already taken a peek at what dior and chanel have on offer this year, so this time, we'll be looking at products from two other major players: guerlain and armani. what strikes me as odd is how well these two collections seem to go together. both have elements with what i'd characterise as very icy tones, shades that are woodsy and still trapped beneath a layer of ice. the kind of colours i associate with being outside on those first unfrozen days when we're teased with the knowledge that yes, it will get warmer eventually, before we were plummeted back into the reality of our sub-arctic location.

guerlain's sprnig offering features bright lips, somewhat similar to what chanel has, cheery blushes in a new formula and, the sleeper hit, an eye shadow quad called "les tendres" that's quite unlike anything they've done before. as far as i'm aware, all item are limited. i snagged the palette, because i was enchanted by its combination of natural and frosty tones. it's an unexpected union, but one that really does put me in mind of early spring.

the first shade is an icy pink with a slight peach tone. it's not exclusively cool, more like the kind of pink that you'd see in very early blossoms, just the faintest bit of pigment. it's quite frosty, in all senses, but buffs out to a much nicer finish if you want something a little less dazzling.

les tendres #1
guerlain has a few highlighters along this line, especially those in the "les noirs" and "les bois de rose" palettes, but this one is a little warmer than either of those. [you'll have to forgive me for not including comparisons, but the light has been so feeble in these parts lately that i consider myself fortunate to have even gotten swatch photos that don't look like grey pools.] you can see some similar colours here.



the second shade, which is surely the one that will stand out here, is a very light, utterly cool green, whiter even than what you'd normally call mint. it's very shimmery and attracts light like a magnet draws metals. it's very nearly a foil finish. this one does not tame so easily, but it's really present to add a bit of energy to the mix. although there's a lot of white in the base, i had no trouble seeing the green when i applied it, even in small amounts.

les tendres #2
this shade has much more white and shimmer to it than other mint shadows i have, which are more green [like mac "aquavert"].

the third and fourth shades are the more muted, natural ones. first up, there's a semi-matte taupe brown. it's on the cooler side of taupe, but doesn't lean grey or mauve. there's definitely more brown in the base shade. it works on either the lid or the crease for me, although on darker skin tones i suspect it'll be more of a base, all-over shade rather than a soft crease one. although it's not deep, it is surprisingly pigmented, so you won't need to use much.

les tendres #3
there are a number of these shades- i've spoken about them before. chanel hasard is more purple, le metier de beaute icon is more pink and darker. rbr sweet dust sereima is cooler and more purple.

finally, we have a medium-deep red-plum shade. this one was a little bit patchy to swatch, although it applied and blended fine. i did find that this was the one shade in the palette that faded a little earlier than the rest. [the other three live up to the excellent wear time i've come to expect from guerlain.] although it's reddish, i didn't find it made my eyes look puffy or sore. that said, i don't know if i'd wear it in the inner corners...

les tendres #4
because it's a matte shade, i don't have anything close to a direct comparison. mac "deep damson" is deeper, more red and browner. all the other shades i could think of in the same range are more shimmery.

like i said, this is a bit of a sleeper in the guerlain spring collection. all the items around it are flashier, but i really feel like this is the most interesting part.

strangely, i found a perfect [and equally original] match for the palette in the armani spring collection. although a lot of the attention has been focused on the peachy "belladonna" highlighter [which may still find its way home with me], armani also released three new shades of their rouge d'armani sheer formulation and three new glosses.

i was immediately drawn to shade "614" [also called "belladonna" in some places], a very cool plummy taupe. i don't know if it will show well on very pigmented lips- armani sheers live up to their name- but on me, the unconventional colour has quite an impact. i love it as an alternative to more beige/ nude shades with a more dramatic eye. it will allow enough of your own lip colour to come through that it will be slightly different on everyone and after a couple of hours, it settles to a faint stain. that stain has surprising lasting power- i could still see some of it after seven hours or so and a couple of cups of coffee. it'll definitely be more subtle at that point, but it wasn't the same as my natural lips.

the rouge d'armani sheer formula is very lightly moisturizing while worn and, as you would expect, feels exceptionally light on the lips.

rouge d'armani sheer 614
being sort of an odd colour, i couldn't find much to compare to it, but mac did have a limited one a few years back called "riveting" that is in the same neighbourhood. it's more opaque [although it's one of mac's less opaque formulas] and has a pink sheen to it, where as "614" has more of a lilac sheen. that difference in overtone makes "614" look cooler as well.

l to r :: 614, mac riveting [l.e.]
as with guerlain, my understanding is that everything in the armani spring collection is limited. [i'm not certain about the glosses and the display does have some of the eyes to kill shadows in it, but all are from the existing permanent collection.]

as i mentioned, there's something about this lipstick and the guerlain palette that just goes perfectly together. as you might have guessed from the title, it puts me in mind of images of wood nymphs or elves, in soft earthy tones with a hint of pixie dust about them. i'm going to stop describing that there before i sound anymore daft than i already do, but it is the image that sprung to mind.

to prove my point, here's a look at the two of them used together.




i won't bother listing out everything i used, because the bulk of the look is comprised of these two products and my base is generally unchanged. i will mention that on the cheeks, i'm wearing dior "brown milly" blush and chanel's "poudre signe" on my cheeks, both of which i thought fit with the 'wood nymph' impression i was going for. i also have illamasqua "havoc" liquid liner on my eyes.

whether or not you agree with my fairytale descriptions, i do recommend both these products as being high quality and perfect for spring. whenever it comes to your part of the world.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

please stop telling me i'm pregnant

i took myself to the doctor this week in order to address a group of symptoms that have been dogging me. they have to do with my lady bits, which do have a tendency to turn grumpy or murderous with age, so i wanted to make sure there wasn't anything seriously wrong.

i went to my family doctor but, as i expected, he had to refer me for tests at a hospital. this requires him to give me an official referral but in order to do so, he needed me to confirm one thing:

"is there any chance that you're pregnant?"

no. there is no chance that i am pregnant. my husband has severe multiple sclerosis and is confined to bed and a wheelchair, so while intimacy is very much part of our lives, penetrative sex is an impossibility. there is absolutely no chance that i am pregnant.

he noted my response and the explanation i gave him and said he would make the referral. but first, they had to give me a pregnancy test.

say what?

it turns out that i could have said i'd been standing on …

making faces :: written in the stars, in lipstick [part two]

it's the middle of september already? i'm not prepared for that? i mean, i am prepared for it because the heat this summer has been murder on me and i've been begging for a reprieve for months but i'm still bowled over by the speed at which time passes. this year, i've been measuring time through the launches of bite beauty's astrology collection, which arrives like the full moon once a month. [the full moon arrives every four weeks, which is less than any month except february -ed.] earlier this year, i took a look at the first four launches of the collection and already it's time to catch up with four more.

the most important thing for you to know is that after several months of problems, bite and sephora appear to have sorted out their inventory planning. for the last several releases, information has been clear and reliable as to when and where each lipstick will be available [pre-orders taken for a couple of days on bite's own website and a general…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…