Skip to main content

making faces :: cheeky!

here's a quick post for you about one of my cosmetic experiments. i am by no means a professional, but i have assembled my own little laboratory...


[un]fortunately, i don't have an assistant to use as a guinea pig subject, so i have to work on myself. this is how tesla got started, i'm certain.

most makeup looks focus on whether to put the emphasis on the eyes or the lips, but i started to wonder: what if i lead with my cheeks? not those cheeks, perverts! [please never change, though.] rather than making the boldest element of a look my eyes or my lips, i thought that it would be fun to have blush be the star and the eyes and lips more supporting players. 


now, while i love bright blushes and doll cheeks, i realised that i couldn't just apply a bright blush and go with nudes everywhere else. even i know that would be silly. [or do i?] so what i decided to do was use a more natural shade, but build up the application so that it was a bit more prominent. and rather than go really light on the eyes and lips, i decided to go more mid-range. 

and here's what happened...



well, it's not exactly earth-shattering, but it is different, at least for me. you could easily react by saying "you're wearing too much blush", but it does sort of give a very wind-kissed "i've been out traipsing across the moors" kind of look, i think. the shades i used were rouge bunny rouge "gracilis", applied in layers for more impact. i swept hourglass "mood light" over it to give a bit more glow and a slightly warmer tone. 

for the eyes, the shades are mostly from rouge bunny rouge as well. i used "golden rhea" over the inner two-thirds of the lid, with "whispering ibis" on the outer third. i used a little of the black shade from armani's "neo-black" palette to deepen the outer corners slightly. i brushed rbr "bohemian waxwing" along the upper part of the crease and inglot "351" under my brows as a matte highlight. then i finished up by lining my upper lash lines with urban decay "invasion" liner [a gorgeous dark green-teal] and the perfunctory mascara- upper and lower. 

the lipstick is a limited shade that mac put out a few years ago called "blooming lovely". it's a very greyed lavender shade that came out as part of their collaboration with british fashion label liberty of london, a small but excellent collection in adorable packaging. with all of the shades that mac has brought back multiple times in the last few years and excitement that a purple lipstick usually generates, i'm kind of astonished that this one has never made a second appearance. there really has never been anything quite like it, although inglot has a shade that's close, just lighter and icier [and, as a result, more difficult to pull off].

so what do you think? is this a trend of the future? or a mistake made eternal through the power of the internet? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

so hip it hurts

there aren't too many artists who stand out as being iconically canadian. it's too easy to mistake us for some other people, mostly americans, who are, let's be honest, pretty similar in a lot of ways. [this is the bit where i apologise for avril lavigne, justin bieber and drake.] the guess who/ bachman turner overdrive held sway over an earlier generation, and musicians and those who appreciate technical proficiency will speak of rush like they are gods, but last night the country said goodbye to perhaps the most canadian of canadian bands, the tragically hip.

for those of you not familiar with that name, the hip emerged in the mid-to-late eighties, among a slew of canadian bands [54-40, the northern pikes, the pursuit of happiness, the grapes of wrath] that balanced on the line between mainstream and alternative rock. all of them played accessible guitar-based music with none of the bombast of seventies dinosaurs, but equally with no hint of the drug-fueled anger that w…

shut up

general reaction seems to be that last night's vice presidential debate was close to a draw, with a slight edge going to mike pence [other than among cnn's panel of independent voters, who overwhelmingly chose tim kaine as the winner]. i feel that's an accurate assessment, although it's largely a question of personal preference. pence absolutely projected the stoic, unflappable, unwavering image that many americans [not just republicans, either] seem to like and equate with strength. for my part, i prefer someone who's a little more mercurial, someone who's able to gets excited about ideas and who's able to expand on them, not just repeat talking points.

so, from my point of view, both vice presidential candidates were pretty disappointing. i found that kaine had a fantastic command of facts and history- he knew pence's voting record better than pence knew his and possibly better than pence knew his own. his opening answers were so smoothly delivered i…

mental health mondays :: parabnormal?

for north america and parts of europe, halloween marked the apex of spooky events, where the veil between the worlds of the living and the dead was at its most diaphanous. but if you're a very traditional roman catholic, you'll know that the 31 of october is merely the beginning, and that the entire month that follows is dedicated to remembering and praying for the dead, specifically for those whose souls are trapped in purgatory. if you listen to dante, purgatory isn't especially pleasant. sure, there's the possibility that you'll end up working off your debt to celestial society, but until then, you get to endure things like having your goddamned eyes sewn shut with iron wire. [much like condo developments, it gets better the higher the floor you live on.]

however, the more common view of purgatory among catholics is that the souls relegated there can't do anything to help themselves, and are reliant on the prayers of their living relatives and loved ones to …