Skip to main content

making faces :: xmas kisses from guerlain

MINE
there's no denying that the holiday season is upon us. i was in the drug store today and while i was waiting for a prescription to be filled, there was a quebecois country hoedown version of "jingle bells" playing and i was consumed with the urge to set things on fire. i always like to take a moment every holiday season to consider the poor sales associates who are forced to work day in and day out with the most insipid holiday music in their ears all the time. they are truly the heroes of xmas.

but even i'm drawn to overcome my seasonal avoidance syndrome enough to risk venturing out to the retail environment when i don't have to in order to try out the season's makeup collections. and none tempts me more each year than guerlain. 

after last year's operatically themed "liu" collection, the company has gone in another direction for this year's "crazy paris". everything is touched with neon, including the packaging, which is black [rather than silver or gold] and features highlights of either fluorescent orange or pink or, in the case of some of the compacts, given a faux 3-d effect. reactions have been mixed, since the look is definitely a leap away from guerlain's normal high-class image, it's like watching a group of wealthy society ladies get tarted up to investigate the seamy scene around broadway and 42nd street in the late 70s/ early 80s. 

personally, i sort of like that guerlain can show its wild side and i find the look in keeping with the colours offered. they're not at all typical holiday shades, at least not as far as the lipsticks are concerned. what you have there are three glowing, unnatural, almost eerie colours that command attention. again, whether or not you enjoy that is a question of personal taste. and anyone who knows my personal tastes knows that these will have been pretty irresistible to me. 

there are two rouge automatiques and one rouge g included as part of the collection. all three are limited, but guerlain are at least reasonably generous with the stock they make available, so you shouldn't have too much trouble tracking them down. 

first up, we have rouge automatique "illusion". it's a purple-berry base with a bit of a pink sheen and blue shimmer. the shimmer isn't visible from a distance, but it has a major impact on the final colour, making it cooler and brighter looking. the slight frost actually makes the colour look smoother on the lips, which is nice, because i find that the base colour tends to pull into my lip lines a little. 

i actually find the formula on this one more similar to the rouge automatique shine lipsticks. it's less opaque than other r.a. shades and it has more sparkle. even the more frosted rouge automatique colours don't have the visible shimmer of this one. i would also say that the lasting power of "illusion" is not as great as the regular rouge automatique formula, but is very much in keeping with what i've seen from the rouge automatique shine range. 

illusion
illusion
the blue shift from the sparkle is not overpowering, but it is visible. your lips will always seem to have a cool sheen and i suspect that the colour will be a no-go for women with very warm skin tones. that said, i sometimes have troubles with very cool lipsticks washing me out, but this one really seemed to hit the mark. 

if i had one hesitation about this shade, it was that i thought i had a lot of colours like it, but as it turns out, the blue shift makes it much more original looking than i'd originally believed. chanel "fiction" is deeper and redder. guerlain "louling", from last year's holiday collection, has a similar, although slightly browner base colour and a lot of gold shimmer that makes it warmer looking on  the lips. 

l to r :: chanel fiction, illusion, guerlain louling [l.e.]
same as above, blurred to show shimmer better
the second rouge automatique is "reflex", a real departure from the usual guerlain palette, a bright coral pink that's almost neon. this one is more like the regular r.a. formula, in that it's creamy and more opaque than "illusion". it does, however, have the same tendency to settle into lip lines, which is unfortunately a little more noticeable because there's no shimmer to hide it. 

straight out of the tube, the colour is almost intimidating, because it's very bright, however it's certainly possible to wear it as more of a stain, where it shows as more of a warm pink. in fact, i find that the brightness of "reflex" fades fairly quickly [and not always evenly], so it might be better to apply it as a stain to begin with. 

reflex
reflex
it is certainly a fun colour and distinct from a lot of other similar shades, because it's both lighter and more pink. dior "montmartre" is deeper and redder. lancome "corset" is more orange. it occurred to me afterward to compare it to mac "fusion pink", which is in the same family, but is darker and has a visible sheen. [you can see "fusion pink" in my "30 days of lips" set, on day twenty-four, or here.]

l to r :: dior montmartre, reflex, lancome corset
what i like about this shade is that it has enough pink and orange to work well with warm or cool skin tones and can be applied to work well with light or dark complexions. [darker complexions may want to apply in layers to ensure that the colour lasts a little longer.] i don't find that this is the best example of a guerlain formula, but it gets full points for originality and it'll easily transition to spring and summer. 

finally, we have "provocative" rouge g. this is really the creme de la creme of lipstick formulas and "provocative" lives up to every bit of the hype. it's incredibly saturated, even, soft on lips, long-lasting and does have a nuanced finish that distinguishes it from other similar shades. i'm honestly stymied for things to say about rouge g's, because i've said the same about every one that i've ever purchased. if anything, the formula is getting better the longer it's around, but the true delight is in how consistent they've become. every shade in this range that's come out in the last year or so has been top of the line. only rouge d'armani rivals it in the ability to deliver excellence so reliably. 

provocative
provocative
"provocative" is a hard shade not to love. if you're truly phobic about bright colours, you'll probably want to sidestep it, although the rouge g formula works fantastically well as a blotted stain. it's an intense red-pink [or pink-red, since it's truly on the border between the two] with no shimmer. it does have a very faint sheen that gives it a little extra glow, but it's really a creamy, full-impact kind of shade. it's more than muscular enough to work against even the darkest skin, but i also love it against my pale face, because it seems to just add life without being overwhelming. the balance of cool and warm tones is just perfect here. it won't clash with any level of warmth or coolness, i'm certain. 

in terms of comparable colours, there are several, although i don't have an exact duplicate. mac "gesina" is redder and creamier. "madame batifole" from guerlain's fall collection, is cooler, pinker, a bit more muted [if you can think of "batifole" as a muted shade]. urban decay "catfight" is similar, but a bit darker and more matte. it's interesting, because the texture on these two is nearly the same, but because of that slight sheen on "provocative", you see a difference. 

l to r :: mac gesina [l.e.], provocative, guerlain madame batifole [l.e.], u.d. catfight
i belatedly thought of armani "402" as a point of comparison. it's in the ballpark, definitely, but it's cooler and redder. 

guerlain really are putting a bold foot forward with these shades. they're offbeat for the french giant in different ways, which will probably divide their fan base a little. i don't think you're going to go wrong with any of them. if you're looking purely for quality, "provocative" is tops. for everyday wearability, "illusion" is your best bet. if you want originality, "reflex" is the way to go. but honestly, feel free to gather them all up and enjoy. 

here's a quick look a "illusion" in action, plus a preview of future reviews if you look closely...

products used

the base ::
hourglass mineral veil primer
nars eye shadow primer
urban decay naked foundation "1.0"
dior firming concealer "010"

the eyes ::
mac e/s "suave intentions"* [greyed sky blue]
mac e/s "pincurl"* [dirty cool neutral]
mac e/s "hypnotising"* [shimmery purple-grey]
mac e/s "love lace"* [shimmery slate blue]
mac e/s "vellum" [ultraviolet white]
illamasqua precision gel liner [black]
hourglass film noir mascara

the cheeks ::
nars blush "coeur battant"* [bright magenta]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "incandescent light"* [blushed white highlight]

the lips ::
guerlain rouge automatique l/s "illusion"* [berry pink with blue shimmer]

*suggested alternates :: suave intentions = mac moon's reflection [cooler, lighter], pincurl = mac crystal + white [very difficult shade to duplicate]; hypnotising = nars lhasa [cooler, less shimmer]; love lace = nars "manchourie" darker shade [matte, darker]; coeur battant, incandescent light and illusion are all still available

all three lipsticks are available at guerlain department store counters everywhere and in canada at shoppers drug mart and murale. sephora has other elements of the holiday collection, but none of the lipsticks, at least not at the counters near me. 

grab 'em while you can

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…