Skip to main content

making faces :: fall in action


since i've already posted about many of my favourite fall products, i thought i might show you what they look like in use.




for those of you who might be stumbling across this post unawares, here's a look at

eye shades that mimic the colourful foliage of the season
eye shades that make a perfect neutral foil for darker lips

blushes that give a wind-kissed flush in keeping with the season
lip colours that reflect the richness of the seasonal palette
lip colours that speak to our inner bad girl

and with those out of the way like so many fallen leaves, here's a look at how some of those products can be combined...




case #1 :: controversy



this was a ridiculously quick look i did using mac's two new paint pots in "tailor grey" and "camel coat" for a neutral base, with a little of urban decay's "smoke" eye liner to give some definition along the upper lash line.

on my cheeks is illamasqua "peaked" blush in their new 'velvet' cream-to-powder formula. i love the slight ruddiness of this shade, which makes it natural despite being pretty intense. i also love that it's easy to control the level of pigment: blend it out with a brush if it's too harsh, keep adding if it's too soft.

and finally, on the lips is chanel "controversy" gloss. this is a fairly light application of "controversy", because it can go much darker on the lips. consider this your daytime look. at night, the [night] sky is the limit, since the shade can go very dark.

case # 2 :: prune avenue



i'm not sure where prune avenue is located. perhaps it's close to electric avenue. regardless, i think i'd like an address there, because this shade from the yves st. laurent fall collection makes me feel right at home.

the eyes come courtesy of marc jacobs "the ingenue" palette [and illamasqua "wisdom" eye liner]. i love how that palette adds a bit of sheen, but still stays soft. and speaking of love, the blush is actually marc jacobs as well, a shade that should have been included in my fall favourites but joined my collection too late. it's "tantalizing", a deep raspberry shade that gives a nice wash of colour that's rich without being overwhelming. definitely won't be my last foray into the jacobs blush line.

i should add that i also dusted hourglass "dim light" over my entire face, to finish the look and give me a slightly warmed glow. what can i say about these powders? it's really difficult to capture their effects in photos, but they're magical in person. i promise.

case #3 :: the uber basics



here's a very quick look that actually comes together really well. seriously, it takes all of five minutes. the eyes are mac "camel coat" on the lids and chanel "hasard" in the crease. this is a great shade for softly creating depth in the eye.

on the cheeks is yves st. laurent "pepper rose", my new favourite blush in my new favourite blush formula. it's natural, but still gives the complexion a nice lift when applied lightly. i've applied a little more here to get that fresh-faced flush going. i'm enamoured of the fact that the blush contains matte and shimmery sections, which makes the finish very polished indeed and self-highlighting.

the lipstick is armani's "611", the perfect vampy fall red. i should note that my lips are in terrible shape lately, so you can see some dryness. it's not the lipstick's fault. i just have had no luck repairing the damage, even with liberal application of my holy grail nuxe reve de miel lip balm. [on a side note, my nails are also basically peeled back to the nail beds, which looks pretty disturbing.] [on another note, please ignore my hair. it was under a hat most of the day.]

so those are a few of my favourite fall looks thus far. i realise that these all adhere to the "neutral eye + vampy lip" rule, so i'll post a follow-up with some warmer, richer autumn faces very shortly.

have any favourite fall faces you've been trying out? or any remedies for perpetually parched pouts? feel free to comment...

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …