Skip to main content

making faces :: fall in action


since i've already posted about many of my favourite fall products, i thought i might show you what they look like in use.




for those of you who might be stumbling across this post unawares, here's a look at

eye shades that mimic the colourful foliage of the season
eye shades that make a perfect neutral foil for darker lips

blushes that give a wind-kissed flush in keeping with the season
lip colours that reflect the richness of the seasonal palette
lip colours that speak to our inner bad girl

and with those out of the way like so many fallen leaves, here's a look at how some of those products can be combined...




case #1 :: controversy



this was a ridiculously quick look i did using mac's two new paint pots in "tailor grey" and "camel coat" for a neutral base, with a little of urban decay's "smoke" eye liner to give some definition along the upper lash line.

on my cheeks is illamasqua "peaked" blush in their new 'velvet' cream-to-powder formula. i love the slight ruddiness of this shade, which makes it natural despite being pretty intense. i also love that it's easy to control the level of pigment: blend it out with a brush if it's too harsh, keep adding if it's too soft.

and finally, on the lips is chanel "controversy" gloss. this is a fairly light application of "controversy", because it can go much darker on the lips. consider this your daytime look. at night, the [night] sky is the limit, since the shade can go very dark.

case # 2 :: prune avenue



i'm not sure where prune avenue is located. perhaps it's close to electric avenue. regardless, i think i'd like an address there, because this shade from the yves st. laurent fall collection makes me feel right at home.

the eyes come courtesy of marc jacobs "the ingenue" palette [and illamasqua "wisdom" eye liner]. i love how that palette adds a bit of sheen, but still stays soft. and speaking of love, the blush is actually marc jacobs as well, a shade that should have been included in my fall favourites but joined my collection too late. it's "tantalizing", a deep raspberry shade that gives a nice wash of colour that's rich without being overwhelming. definitely won't be my last foray into the jacobs blush line.

i should add that i also dusted hourglass "dim light" over my entire face, to finish the look and give me a slightly warmed glow. what can i say about these powders? it's really difficult to capture their effects in photos, but they're magical in person. i promise.

case #3 :: the uber basics



here's a very quick look that actually comes together really well. seriously, it takes all of five minutes. the eyes are mac "camel coat" on the lids and chanel "hasard" in the crease. this is a great shade for softly creating depth in the eye.

on the cheeks is yves st. laurent "pepper rose", my new favourite blush in my new favourite blush formula. it's natural, but still gives the complexion a nice lift when applied lightly. i've applied a little more here to get that fresh-faced flush going. i'm enamoured of the fact that the blush contains matte and shimmery sections, which makes the finish very polished indeed and self-highlighting.

the lipstick is armani's "611", the perfect vampy fall red. i should note that my lips are in terrible shape lately, so you can see some dryness. it's not the lipstick's fault. i just have had no luck repairing the damage, even with liberal application of my holy grail nuxe reve de miel lip balm. [on a side note, my nails are also basically peeled back to the nail beds, which looks pretty disturbing.] [on another note, please ignore my hair. it was under a hat most of the day.]

so those are a few of my favourite fall looks thus far. i realise that these all adhere to the "neutral eye + vampy lip" rule, so i'll post a follow-up with some warmer, richer autumn faces very shortly.

have any favourite fall faces you've been trying out? or any remedies for perpetually parched pouts? feel free to comment...

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …