Skip to main content

making faces :: a flirty little number for fall

with a grande dame like "madame batifole" as part of their fall collection, guerlain runs the risk of having their other lipsticks obscured by her intensity and drama. and that would be a shame, because her good friend "madame flirte" is no shrinking violet. described as a "fruity red", she is indeed a cool, juicy, happy hue with enough red for impact, but enough lightness that she can fit in anywhere.

although "madame flirte" is a rouge g, she's not quite the same as the "regular" lipsticks with that formula. the shade lacks opacity- although she's not sheer like the pink shades from the spring 2012 collection- so there's always a hint of one's own lip colour lurking in the background. she reminds me a lot of "rouge sensuel" from the spring 2011 collection, although "flirte" is a bit cooler and pinker and doesn't have the subtle warm-gold shimmer of "rouge sensuel". they make nice companion pieces and, since both are limited, they make reasonable substitutes for one another, as long as you can handle a certain variation in colour temperature within the red family.

madame flirte
in fact, when you look at the two shades together, they seem fairly close, but i do see the difference on my lips. another similar shade is the limited and sadly gone mac shade viva glam cyndi, which again looks similar swatched, but pulls much warmer/ browner than either of these on my lips [and also bleeds something fierce, which is a bit of a bummer]. something like armani 608 is cooler and darker than either.

l to r :: guerlain rouge sensuel [l.e.], madame flirte, mac viva glam cyndi [l.e.]

ironically, i find "madame flirte" to be a very spring-like red, perhaps because of the natural brightness of the shade that's pronounced, but not overwhelming. it's not a power red, but it's not at all muted either. it seems very fresh, clear and, true to the description, fruity when applied. women whose complexions favour low to moderate colour saturation or who lean noticeably warm might have a little more difficulty feeling at home in such a colour.

SEE HOW SHE LOOKS IN ACTION AFTER THE BREAK...



there's not a lot more that i can say, since i feel like i've talked myself out when it comes to guerlain lipstick. yes, they're pricey, especially the rouge g's with their baroque packaging, but they really are quite fantastic to wear. they're one of the better formulas when my lips are feeling parched, since they don't aggravate dryness and don't bleed [even a soft but pigmented shade like "madame flirte"], although when things are really dire [usually in february or so], i almost have to swear off lipsticks entirely.

here's the lady herself in action... with a few friends to support her loveliness.




the base ::
gosh velvet touch primer
guerlain parure de lumiere foundation "01"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
ysl e/l "gold star" [antique gold, used in this case as a base all over the lid]
rbr e/s "angelic cockatiels" [metallic amber-honey]
rbr e/s "bashful flamingo" [light pink-peach]
burberry e/s "pale barley" [dirty golden taupe]
inglot e/s "351" [light matte ivory]
ysl e/l "baby doll rose" [warm pink]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "demolition" [dark cool brown]
givenchy nour couture mascara "satin brown" + ysl baby doll mascara [i find that adding a little of the black mascara keeps the brown from making the rims of my eyes look redder]

the cheeks ::
becca beach tint "fig" [sandy beige]
chanel joues contraste blush "rose ecrin" [shimmery beige-pink]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "dim light" [warm pink-beige]

the lips ::
guerlain rouge g l/s "madame flirte" [juicy red]

there's mostly neutral stuff going on here, but i quite like the counterpoint of the brighter lip and the unexpected rosy liner. it was fun seeing how the softer shades i used on my cheeks built up into something different and, indeed, something with a subtle but definite impact. i felt very glow-y and healthy looking.

Comments

Bellyhead said…
I think you wear these brights so well. Mme. Flirte is a very pretty color and I adore this slightly sheer version of the Rouge G. :D
Kate MacDonald said…
Thanks very much, Belly! I do feel more comfortable in brights, for certain. I know that some people find them gaudy, but they've always felt fairly natural on me.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …