Skip to main content

making faces :: fall in, part 3 [the vamp stamp]

this post is almost a repeat, since i did a post including three favourite vampy lipsticks a while back, but even then, one of them [mac "tribalist"] was no longer available and in the interim tom ford has seen fit to discontinue "black orchid". that's a shame and i suspect that we'll see a mad rush on these on ebay, with buyers demanding ridiculous prices. i'm glad that i still have plenty left on mine.

but for those of you who are still searching for that perfect dark lipstick to set your halloween-loving heart a-flutter, i'm here to help. and by help, i mean recommend places where you can spend your money.

first, a word about what i mean by "vampy". there are lots of dark lipsticks. every company has darker shades. but truly vamp shades, the kind that channel silver screen icons like theda bara [ok, you only ever got to see her in black and white, but the term "vamp" was coined for her, so she's my go-to example], are a particular breed.

they are exceptionally deep, for starters. chanel "fatale" is a great fall red, but it's not a vamp colour. it's too bright.

but as dark as they are, they're not black. black is cold and sharp and modern. to me, there's something antiqued about a true vamp shade. 

by my definition [and it's my blog, so i get to impose these], there is no such thing as a purely cool vampy lipstick. ultra-dark cool purples are also too modern, just like black. a vampy purple will have a hint of red.

to that end, vamp shades are somewhat difficult to define in terms of colour, because they tend to be a mix of dark red, dark brown and dark purple. they may lean towards one, but the best ones contain elements of all three.

so given those points, here are a few of my very favourites that you can buy now and for the foreseeable future.

609, sorry for the finger smudge
armani :: rouge d'armani 609

this was initially released as a limited shade with a small collection called "downtown". the collection was just half a dozen lipstick shades, but i'm assuming that it was successful, despite a ridiculously low profile, because every single one of the shades has migrated into the permanent collection, including this one, which may be the be-all, end-all of vampy lipsticks.

it has the strange distinction of appearing somewhat sheer when swatched, but on lips it's completely opaque. for those who mourn the loss of "black orchid", this is the closest thing you're going to find. it's a bit browner, but they're very, very close. also, i prefer the rouge d'armani formula, which technically means that this one, in my books, is an improvement.

armani at its finest is a wonder to behold. pure class.

611
armani :: rouge d'armani 611

this is a recent release that i've reviewed already, but i can't not include it. you can see how it's redder and more opaque than #609, a little more cabernet to 609's barolo. i've nothing to add to my original review. i hope that this one is being made permanent, because it truly deserves its place in the department store sun. because it's a more opaque shade, i find it's just a little more dramatic than #609, despite being a wee smidgen lighter.

how i love thee.

chanel :: controversy

if you think all glosses are light on pigment, meet controversy. a new [and possibly permanent, i've heard conflicting things] addition to the chanel extrait de gloss line-up, it's a long-wearing, nearly opaque shade that truly meets the definition of vamp. it's not a deep colour done sheer. this is the real deal. yes, this is chanel's "heavy duty" gloss formula, but the fact is that i generally don't find them that close to opaque. but "controversy" is truly an untamed beast.

controversy
dark brown predominates, but there's definitely a healthy dose of purple and just a smidgen of red at work. it's a great colour that doesn't make me look drained, as many dark browns can do.

the greatest thing about this product, though, is the formula. dark glosses are notoriously uneven, which makes them annoying to apply, wear and layer. not "controversy". it goes on smooth, layers evenly and wears extremely well. it fades over a few hours to a stain with remarkable tenacity. so for once, it's a gloss with all the great properties of a lipstick. bravo, chanel. bravo.

[and lest we forget, the last time i did a list like this, i recommended chanel's "ballet russe" rouge coco lipstick. this remains an absolute favourite of mine, a deep plum brown with purple undertones.]

yves st. laurent :: prune avenue

there are a lot of things that yves st. laurent does well, but one thing that they've come to do better than anyone is deep, dramatic lipsticks. they increasingly own the dark end of the colour range like this shade, from their fall collection and possibly an addition to the permanent rouge pur couture range. [again, i've heard conflicting things.]

prune avenue
the purple predominates in this shade, but it has the bloody red-brown undertone that's just autumn perfection. applied, it's smooth and satiny, nearly matte, but not quite. i find it's difficult to overdo the colour, too, because it goes on in lighter layers. it isn't perfectly even on dry lips, but it's still good. maybe make sure that you exfoliate and dab a little balm, or use a lip primer if you believe in them. the formula is neither hydrating nor drying and the lasting time is terrific for something so lightweight.

yves st. laurent have a lot of dark options and, as mentioned above, i think that if you want a quality deep colour, they should be your first stop. [or armani, clearly, although they don't have the number of dark shades available that ysl does.] they all have that easy layering quality, which makes them adjustable to various situations, day and night. other shades to check out would be the deep berry "pourpre carmine" and the icy dark purple "pourpre divin". of course, they also have a fantastic selection of what i'll term the "near darks".

Comments

Bellyhead said…
I'm not a gloss kinda person, but the Chanel Controversy is glorious! That layered over a lipstick would be killer!
You have a really beautiful vamp collection!!
Kate MacDonald said…
Thanks Belly. Believe me, the vamp collection swatches could go on and on... Controversy is a gloss, but it almost leans toward being a liquid lipstick if you layer it. Definitely something to win over the gloss-averse girls like you and me.
Lucinda Veen said…
I agree that YSL does deep shades beautifully. One of my favorite lipsticks ever is Rouge Pur Couture in Belle de Rose, a dark purply-fuchsia berry. It's probably too bright and clear to be truly "vampy" by your standards, and it has no brown at all, but it's a gorgeous fall color.
Kate MacDonald said…
Hi Lucinda! Would you believe that I don't own Belle de Rose? From photos, it does look almost dark enough to meet even my overly-strict definition of a vampy lip.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [winter edition]

it seems oddly canadian to have two posts in a row about winter/ cold/ snow, but they're obviously unrelated. after all, for most people winter is a season, but in colour analysis terms, winter is part of what you are, an effect of the different wavelengths that comprise the physical part of the thing known as "you". this might be getting a little heady for a post about lipstick. moving on...

if you've perused the other entries in this series without finding something that really spoke to you [figuratively- lipsticks shouldn't actually speak to you- get help], you may belong in one of the winter seasons. winter, like summer, is cool in tone; like spring, it is saturated; like autumn, it is dark. that combination of elements creates a colour palette [or three] that reads as very "strong" to most. and on people who aren't part of the winter group, such a palette would look severe. the point of finding a palette that reads "correctly" on you…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…