Skip to main content

making faces :: madame refuses to wait

something tasty's here...
so despite the fact that i had a three day weekend in which i really didn't accomplish a whole heck of a
lot else, i was remiss in getting swatches of some of the new things that i've added to my collection. and one of them just didn't want to wait for me to have time this weekend or take chances that the light might be less than perfect for her.

honestly, though, i don't think "madame batifole" would need to worry. one of three new and limited rouge g's from guerlain's fall collection, i believe she'd be stunning in any light.

first of all, madame has pigment. all rouge g's are pigmented, of course, but not all have quite this much. the only other i've met that is her match is "gigolo", from guerlain's 2011 fall collection. the two shades do remind me of one another in a way i can't quite put into words [which won't stop you from trying -ed.]. both are berry shades with a lot of red in them. "gigolo" is deeper and purpler. "madame batifole" is brighter and pinker. both have a hint of pinky-red shimmer that doesn't read as frost but does somehow affect how the colour is perceived. perhaps they're day and night versions of each other? or light and dark? "madame batifole" translates roughly as "the lady frolics", whereas gigolo... well, you see where there might be a thematic link.

direct light
indirect light
of course, the two shades don't look especially similar for the reasons i've outlined above. nor does the lady really resemble mac "rebel" [seen here], although both fall into the same category of shade- bright berry tones. the madame is more pink/ red, noticeably warmer. my recently acquired urban decay "jilted"has a somewhat similar base, but they part ways from there. "jilted" has an icy sheen that pulls the colour decidedly cool, whereas la madame runs warm.



because of her impeccable balance of warm and cool and the multiplicity of shades she carries within her, "madame batifole" is a perfect guest for any party, or any face. the question is not whether she will be a match for you, the question is whether or not you will be able to match her. after all, she is bold and strong and powerful. she wants to be noticed and will make this happen. if you're up to that challenge, then she will be the best partner you could wish for- and one who will stay with you in all her glory for as long as you want her. [note:: she means "long-wearing". i never know what to do when she goes all rapturous like this. -ed.]

ahem. i've already said virtually everything i can say about the rouge g formula. like gigolo, this is an exceptional variation on an already exceptional product. at their best, there is almost nothing that can compete with them. [the "almost" is in recognition of the fact that there is a constant tug-of-war in my heart between rouge g's and rouge d'armanis.]

i love shades like "madame batifole" because they are so simple to wear and require so little in the way of adornment. here's what i mean.




the base ::
gosh velvet touch primer
armani luminous silk foundation "3"
nars radiant creamy concealer "vanilla"
mac paint pot "painterly"

the eyes ::
guerlain e/s palette "les bois roses" [shimmery pink-white, pink granite, warm grey, dark mahogany brown]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "gracious arasari" [deep satin beige]
urban decay 24/7 e/l "desperation" [dark coffee brown]
ysl baby doll mascara

the cheeks ::
nars blush "nico" [satin cream beige]
hourglass ambient lighting powder "dim light" [warm shimmery beige]

lips ::
guerlain rouge g l/s "madame batifole" [intense red magenta]

the verdict? this lady could not be more beautiful if she tried. i'd recommend her wholeheartedly. if you've been colour-analysed as a "bright" season [which i suspect i am], either winter or spring, this is absolutely a must-have. [i'm caught between those seasons when categorizing the look above.] my guess is that anyone across the winter spectrum, a true spring, a true summer or even a dark autumn would also carry this beautifully.

available now wherever guerlain is sold. for canadians, that includes shoppers drug mart, who have apparently reversed their decision only to carry permanent items from the brand.

the lovely photo at the top of this post was snatched from this page, a forum where you can find many exciting photos and discussions of reptiles.

Comments

Bellyhead said…
This looks incredible on you! Bright, clear and so flattering. Madame Batifole does right by your face. :)
Lucinda Veen said…
This reminds me of one of my favorite drugstore lipsticks (and one of my favorite lipsticks in general), Maybelline Vivid Rose. It doesn't have any shimmer, but it's that amazing red-toned fuchsia color.
Kate MacDonald said…
Why thank you! She does make me happy, as do most bright shades.
Kate MacDonald said…
Lucinda- I can see what you mean. There is something about fuchsia shades when they have red in them that's quite exceptional. You expect them to be very cool-toned, but they aren't... Just magical, I think.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [winter edition]

it seems oddly canadian to have two posts in a row about winter/ cold/ snow, but they're obviously unrelated. after all, for most people winter is a season, but in colour analysis terms, winter is part of what you are, an effect of the different wavelengths that comprise the physical part of the thing known as "you". this might be getting a little heady for a post about lipstick. moving on...

if you've perused the other entries in this series without finding something that really spoke to you [figuratively- lipsticks shouldn't actually speak to you- get help], you may belong in one of the winter seasons. winter, like summer, is cool in tone; like spring, it is saturated; like autumn, it is dark. that combination of elements creates a colour palette [or three] that reads as very "strong" to most. and on people who aren't part of the winter group, such a palette would look severe. the point of finding a palette that reads "correctly" on you…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…