Skip to main content

making faces :: burberry bits

during my brief sojourn in the west last month, i did have the time to stop by the holt renfrew there and
see one of the only two burberry makeup counters in canada. i'm not in the least bit happy that this collection has been limited to the toronto and vancouver flagship stores, especially since we have a beautiful flagship store here in montreal. and now that i've actually gotten to try burberry products, i'm even less happy about the limited availability.

burberry are still newcomers to the cosmetic world, having launched their collection just a few short years ago. they've already become darlings of the makeup mafia, with virtually all of their products garnering rave reviews from ladies who know their stuff. as you might expect from a design house, the products are pricy and even by the standards of prestige brands, their prices are high, but it's worth noting that you tend to get a fair amount of product. which is especially nice when you're limited as to how often you can get to a counter to try things out on your skin.

the colour selection across the line is restrained, quietly conservative, understated and classy. in fact, burberry have done a bang-up job of creating a collection that reflects the same design principles they espouse in their fashions. you won't find any neon brights or glitters, but what you will find, in spades, are sumptuous shades you can wear every day, but that don't look "everyday".

usually when i'm trying a new brand, i like to grab a couple of different products and with burberry i certainly could have, but i was so tempted by their single eye shadows that i ended up grabbing two of those. [i would have bought more, except that there was also a chantecaille counter, which i'll get to in a later post.]

PLEASE PROCEED...



first up, we have what is apparently the best-selling shade in the burberry colour line, "pale barley". it was not part of the original line up, but came out with last year's spring collection and has been a cult favourite ever since. there was a bit of a panic when it disappeared from the burberry site and from counters a little while back, but evidently this is a temporary situation. "pale barley" is here to stay.

and how fortunate! like most great cult products, what distinguishes "pale barley" are its subtleties. it's a neutral brown base [it's not grey enough for me to call it taupe] that's soft, but has some dimension to it, with a gold sheen that warms the shade up and makes it a bit brighter on the eye. it's not an intense colour, but there's enough going on that it can work fine on its own. mixed with other shades, it's fairly quiet, just adding a slightly toasty element to the colour party.

pale barley
it is warm-toned, but the base keeps it neutral enough that all but the coolest complexions should be able to make it work for them without too much effort. it reminds me a little of rouge bunny rouge "bohemian waxwing", not so much because the colours are terribly similar, but because both are like a one-man band: capable of doing everything themselves. and both are excellent alternatives for those who want to apply a single shade and go [whoever you are]. it is somewhat similar to mac "patina" in that both have a neutral base with gold sheen [which i didn't do a great job of capturing in photos], but "patina" is cooler and lighter.

l to r :: rbr bohemian waxwing, pale barley, mac patina, simon-related injury

here's a quick look at the product in action. even on my puffy, tired lids [i was still sick in these pictures], i find it just glows...

pale barley on lids
same as above
second up, we have "antique rose", certainly one of the most perfectly named shadows in my collection. the colour really does remind me of slightly faded flowers on an antique rug or wallpaper. it's a dusty mauve-pink with a satin finish- just short of completely matte. although it leans cool, being a purple-based shade, it has quite a bit of red in it, which means that it's not so cool that warmer complexions couldn't pull it off.

antique rose
although this one doesn't get the accolades of other burberry shades, i fell instantly in love. i love the fact that it's richly pigmented, which so many dusty shades aren't. i love the fact that while it blends nicely, it doesn't disappear, which a lot of soft shades do. i love the fact that i didn't even have a shade to bother comparing it to, because everything else i have is cooler and more faded and even greyer.

"antique rose" adds a rich dimension to other shades, be they warmer or cooler. i've particularly grown to love it in combination with laura mercier's cult favourite "african violet" [a softer, lighter purple with lots of gold shimmer], but it's also nice used in the crease with "pale barley" on the lids- shades of purple and gold are wonderful together, since they echo the complementary pair of purple and yellow on the colour wheel. this is actually pretty close to a workhorse neutral when it comes to pairing it with other shades.

here's a look at how nicely it works with gold shades [full look breakdown here]

antique rose in crease

same as above

of course, my problem now is that i need to get MOAR BURBERRY, since i know that they do live up to their hype, at least in eye shadows. you can apparently order from their web site in canada, although nothing beats being able to swatch something on your skin in person. although the brand is available through major u.s. retailers, they won't ship burberry beauty products to canada. i can hope, in the meantime that holt renfrew decides to expand the stores allowed to carry the line, or that they make a deal with another retailer because it's going to get expensive flying to toronto and vancouver for my cosmetic fix. 

Comments

LilJeJa said…
I do not own not even one Burberry piece ... Yet! I am scared I will like it and then wishlist become never ending. I like that they created conservative and simple natural colors. I am mostly drawn to their blushes.
Kate MacDonald said…
Part of me (the part that watches my bank account) wishes I hadn't discovered them. They truly live up to their hype and the textures of everything I tried are divine.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …