Skip to main content

making faces :: prepare to get flashed by armani


i first heard that giorgio armani was releasing a new gloss formula called "flash lacquer" a little while back on best things in beauty. i have to admit, i was a little hesitant, because, having initially snubbed the gloss d'armani formula launched in 2011 because i found it too sheer, i've since fallen bum over noggin in love with it because, despite the sheerness, it's the easiest to use and longest-wearing gloss i've found. so knowing that there was a competing gloss creeping onto the scene made me wonder if there was really room for the ones i'd decided were my favourites. 

but last week, my armani counter decided to go rogue and put out several shades of the new formula for sale, although technically, they weren't supposed to do so until a little later. i tried out a few of them and i do have to admit that i probably, if pressed, think that the colour selection in the flash lacquers is more comprehensive than in the original gloss d'armani line-up, because there are differing levels of pigmentation. those differences are accounted for by the fact that there are three different "families" of shades within the flash lacquer range: more intense, creamy shades dubbed "pure attitude", pearly shades called "pearly japanese enamels" and a more glittery group known as the "sparkling midnight shimmers". the first group pack a lot more pigment than any of the other armani glosses i've seen, but the other two groups seem roughly similar. 

when choosing a colour, my eye was, of course, drawn to the grey-violet "black pearl", part of the "sparkling midnight shimmers" group. [is it just me, or does that sound like a really cheesy roller derby team?] 

armani black pearl
it's a relatively sheer colour, but it definitely veils the lips in a cool lavender-grey colour with a lot of sparkle. it's a very refined kind of sparkle, though, not like glitter glosses of old, but more like a very sophisticated, modern take on a goth lip. it's also surprisingly wearable, which i'll get to later. 


the first thing it reminded me of was, of course, givenchy's gelee interdit in "celestial black". it has more colour to it and the shimmer is more dense. the shimmer in "black pearl" is also cooler in tone, which means that the shade on the lips looks very icy. 

l to r :: black pearl, givenchy celestial black
i'm not certain this would work on ladies [or gentlemen] who have a very warm or olive undertone to their skin, but i really like the contrast against my complexion. 

as for the formula, it certainly passes the "non-sticky" test. [i tested this out with a couple of shades by giving dom a kiss at the counter. fyi, it is not transfer resistant.] it's a luxuriously smooth, very hydrating gloss that makes my lips look a bit smoother and fuller by playing with the way that they reflect light. it does not have the fascinating "gelling" effect that the original gloss d'armanis have. those set on the lips to a more gel-like consistency, which makes them the longest-wearing glosses i own. [note :: i have not tried the ysl glossy stains, which i see as something different than a regular gloss anyway.]

predictably, this means that the new flash lacquers aren't actually as long wearing as their predecessors, although the colour, even on a sheer shade like "black pearl" does stick around for a surprising amount of time. it leaves a residual shimmer but the shimmer doesn't travel, which means that you're not going to end up with sparkly bits adorning your unplucked nostril hairs at the end of the evening. 

i asked the ladies at my armani counter how these fit into the line with the existing armani glosses and opinion was divided. officially, there is no plan to discontinue the existing ones, but on the other hand, it's kind of difficult to see how two products that are so similar can continue to flourish. my guess is that there won't be any immediate move to get rid of the existing gloss d'armani shades, but i wouldn't expect any new ones either. 

the flash lacquers are now live on armani's web site and should be arriving in stores shortly. contrary to the original press release, which stated that there would be 36 shades, there appears to be 18 for this launch, which is still a lot of shades if you think about it. i'm personally eager to try out some of the other "families" within the larger flash lacquer group [aside from just trying them on in store, although even doing that has convinced me that i want #523, which makes it look like your lips have been glazed with cherry candy]. armani has them listed as limited edition on the web site, but everywhere else [including my counter] is working under the impression that they're permanent.

here's a look that i wore for easter dinner to my in-laws. that's not the first place that most people would think of trying out a grey shimmery lip gloss, but i figured that it was subtle enough to get away with it and it caught my sister-in-law's attention enough to ask what the shade was. like i said, it's a surprising wearable colour.


for those of you wondering, i paired it with guerlain's "attrape-coeur" eye shadow palette and wore hourglass "mood light" [reviewing coming very shortly, i swear] on the cheeks. and just for good measure, that's chanel's "black pearl" polish on my nails. 

Comments

LilJeJa said…
Black pearl is stunning!
Kate MacDonald said…
Glad you like it! It really is a very modern looking shade that I think a lot of women could wear.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…