Skip to main content

making faces :: prepare to get flashed by armani


i first heard that giorgio armani was releasing a new gloss formula called "flash lacquer" a little while back on best things in beauty. i have to admit, i was a little hesitant, because, having initially snubbed the gloss d'armani formula launched in 2011 because i found it too sheer, i've since fallen bum over noggin in love with it because, despite the sheerness, it's the easiest to use and longest-wearing gloss i've found. so knowing that there was a competing gloss creeping onto the scene made me wonder if there was really room for the ones i'd decided were my favourites. 

but last week, my armani counter decided to go rogue and put out several shades of the new formula for sale, although technically, they weren't supposed to do so until a little later. i tried out a few of them and i do have to admit that i probably, if pressed, think that the colour selection in the flash lacquers is more comprehensive than in the original gloss d'armani line-up, because there are differing levels of pigmentation. those differences are accounted for by the fact that there are three different "families" of shades within the flash lacquer range: more intense, creamy shades dubbed "pure attitude", pearly shades called "pearly japanese enamels" and a more glittery group known as the "sparkling midnight shimmers". the first group pack a lot more pigment than any of the other armani glosses i've seen, but the other two groups seem roughly similar. 

when choosing a colour, my eye was, of course, drawn to the grey-violet "black pearl", part of the "sparkling midnight shimmers" group. [is it just me, or does that sound like a really cheesy roller derby team?] 

armani black pearl
it's a relatively sheer colour, but it definitely veils the lips in a cool lavender-grey colour with a lot of sparkle. it's a very refined kind of sparkle, though, not like glitter glosses of old, but more like a very sophisticated, modern take on a goth lip. it's also surprisingly wearable, which i'll get to later. 


the first thing it reminded me of was, of course, givenchy's gelee interdit in "celestial black". it has more colour to it and the shimmer is more dense. the shimmer in "black pearl" is also cooler in tone, which means that the shade on the lips looks very icy. 

l to r :: black pearl, givenchy celestial black
i'm not certain this would work on ladies [or gentlemen] who have a very warm or olive undertone to their skin, but i really like the contrast against my complexion. 

as for the formula, it certainly passes the "non-sticky" test. [i tested this out with a couple of shades by giving dom a kiss at the counter. fyi, it is not transfer resistant.] it's a luxuriously smooth, very hydrating gloss that makes my lips look a bit smoother and fuller by playing with the way that they reflect light. it does not have the fascinating "gelling" effect that the original gloss d'armanis have. those set on the lips to a more gel-like consistency, which makes them the longest-wearing glosses i own. [note :: i have not tried the ysl glossy stains, which i see as something different than a regular gloss anyway.]

predictably, this means that the new flash lacquers aren't actually as long wearing as their predecessors, although the colour, even on a sheer shade like "black pearl" does stick around for a surprising amount of time. it leaves a residual shimmer but the shimmer doesn't travel, which means that you're not going to end up with sparkly bits adorning your unplucked nostril hairs at the end of the evening. 

i asked the ladies at my armani counter how these fit into the line with the existing armani glosses and opinion was divided. officially, there is no plan to discontinue the existing ones, but on the other hand, it's kind of difficult to see how two products that are so similar can continue to flourish. my guess is that there won't be any immediate move to get rid of the existing gloss d'armani shades, but i wouldn't expect any new ones either. 

the flash lacquers are now live on armani's web site and should be arriving in stores shortly. contrary to the original press release, which stated that there would be 36 shades, there appears to be 18 for this launch, which is still a lot of shades if you think about it. i'm personally eager to try out some of the other "families" within the larger flash lacquer group [aside from just trying them on in store, although even doing that has convinced me that i want #523, which makes it look like your lips have been glazed with cherry candy]. armani has them listed as limited edition on the web site, but everywhere else [including my counter] is working under the impression that they're permanent.

here's a look that i wore for easter dinner to my in-laws. that's not the first place that most people would think of trying out a grey shimmery lip gloss, but i figured that it was subtle enough to get away with it and it caught my sister-in-law's attention enough to ask what the shade was. like i said, it's a surprising wearable colour.


for those of you wondering, i paired it with guerlain's "attrape-coeur" eye shadow palette and wore hourglass "mood light" [reviewing coming very shortly, i swear] on the cheeks. and just for good measure, that's chanel's "black pearl" polish on my nails. 

Comments

LilJeJa said…
Black pearl is stunning!
Kate MacDonald said…
Glad you like it! It really is a very modern looking shade that I think a lot of women could wear.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [winter edition]

it seems oddly canadian to have two posts in a row about winter/ cold/ snow, but they're obviously unrelated. after all, for most people winter is a season, but in colour analysis terms, winter is part of what you are, an effect of the different wavelengths that comprise the physical part of the thing known as "you". this might be getting a little heady for a post about lipstick. moving on...

if you've perused the other entries in this series without finding something that really spoke to you [figuratively- lipsticks shouldn't actually speak to you- get help], you may belong in one of the winter seasons. winter, like summer, is cool in tone; like spring, it is saturated; like autumn, it is dark. that combination of elements creates a colour palette [or three] that reads as very "strong" to most. and on people who aren't part of the winter group, such a palette would look severe. the point of finding a palette that reads "correctly" on you…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…