Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: let's talk about bell's #letstalk

although i'm no longer doing regular mental health mondays posts, i did think that it was worth mentioning that tomorrow, bell canada will be increasing their donations to mental health initiatives across canada through their "let's talk" program. if you're a bell customer, you can ramp up the donations simply by sending a text message or making a long distance phone call. if you're not a bell/ aliant customer, you can join the cause by sending tweets with #bellletstalk on february 12th or by sharing the bell let's talk logo on facebook.

it is somewhat ironic for me that a corporation that once drove me into fits of near-psychotic rage is championing the cause for mental health, but i salute them for their efforts. aside from whatever they're donating, they've mounted a pretty visible advertising campaign to call attention to the event and to the silent scourge of mental disorders in general. and supporting mental health is not like supporting children's charities- mental health issues are still stigmatised as shameful for the sufferer or as figments of the imagination. standing up for the rights of the mentally ill takes some testicular fortitude. so i salute them.

of course, my cynical side has to point out that if you aren't already a bell customer, you're forced to promote the corporate tie-in and not just the subject. bell could certainly track tweets using the hashing #letstalkfeb12, for instance, but they wouldn't garner as much exposure.

i don't think there's anything that they could do to win me back as a customer, but mounting a campaign to increase funding and visibility for people suffering from mental disorders, they have at least won a certain amount of my respect.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …