Skip to main content

mental health mondays :: let's talk about bell's #letstalk

although i'm no longer doing regular mental health mondays posts, i did think that it was worth mentioning that tomorrow, bell canada will be increasing their donations to mental health initiatives across canada through their "let's talk" program. if you're a bell customer, you can ramp up the donations simply by sending a text message or making a long distance phone call. if you're not a bell/ aliant customer, you can join the cause by sending tweets with #bellletstalk on february 12th or by sharing the bell let's talk logo on facebook.

it is somewhat ironic for me that a corporation that once drove me into fits of near-psychotic rage is championing the cause for mental health, but i salute them for their efforts. aside from whatever they're donating, they've mounted a pretty visible advertising campaign to call attention to the event and to the silent scourge of mental disorders in general. and supporting mental health is not like supporting children's charities- mental health issues are still stigmatised as shameful for the sufferer or as figments of the imagination. standing up for the rights of the mentally ill takes some testicular fortitude. so i salute them.

of course, my cynical side has to point out that if you aren't already a bell customer, you're forced to promote the corporate tie-in and not just the subject. bell could certainly track tweets using the hashing #letstalkfeb12, for instance, but they wouldn't garner as much exposure.

i don't think there's anything that they could do to win me back as a customer, but mounting a campaign to increase funding and visibility for people suffering from mental disorders, they have at least won a certain amount of my respect.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …