Skip to main content

making faces :: guerlain loves lilacs and lavender

i'm going to be especially honest with you: this is most likely not the only guerlain spring 2013 collection you'll be seeing from me. i'm still trying to find the socks that guerlain blew off with their holiday collection, but what they've done for spring... the magical makeup gnomes have been very busy indeed in the house that jacques built.

one of the things that i love about this collection, aside from the fact that i'm starting to sound irritatingly repetitive as i gush over successive guerlain launches, is how they seem to have come up with a group of products that comes dangerously close to being "typical", but still has plenty of variety and gives you the little extra that a prestige brand should. what i especially love is how they've combined a couple of different sides to spring in one collection: you have greens and corals on the one hand, while on the other, you have the delicate lavender, lilac and pink shades, which is the part that we'll be dealing with today.

personally, i've always felt that light, soft purple tones are every bit as integral of spring as the ubiquitous greens. after all, those are the first real messengers- the first flowers that we see that signal the imminent arrival of warm weather and allergy season. sure, the spring is marked by the arrival of green buds, but almost before we get to see the green, we're overwhelmed with delicate purples. and that's fine with me.

on that theme, one of two limited edition "ecrin 4 couleurs" eye shadow palettes contains all the soft, floral purples that the season could require. it's called "attrape-coeur" literally "heart trap", which is actually a pretty good descriptor of its effect on me when i first saw photos of it. guerlain has a permanent shadow palette called "les violets" [the purples], but it's a little heavier, a little more dramatic and, frankly, a little less versatile than what we have here.

the first shade is not exceptionally original, it's a frosty [very frosty] white highlight that leans ever so slightly pink in certain lights. it's similar to many other highlighter shades, most notably mac's "crystal avalanche", which is just as frosty and bright, but without the slightly pinkish hue.

natural light

l to r :: attrape-coeur, mac crystal avalanche :: natural light

the colour payoff is fantastic. it's very opaque with just a light application, but it's also frosty enough that i find myself reaching for a blending brush as soon as it's on. it's not that it makes my lids look "crepe-y" or that it settles in any lines around my eyes, but it just takes very little for it to look a bit heavy on my lids. mercifully, it does blend out pretty well.



next, we have a dirty lilac-pink. it reminded me immediately of mac's "seedy pearl", which also has that slightly grimy sheen to it. neither shade swatches very well, but both seem to offer good colour payoff on the eyelid. i will say that i had to build this one up a little more than its neighbours, but because the application is so smooth, this doesn't represent a problem. applied lightly, it's not what i'd call sheer, but it's more subtle, the kind of shade that you see more when the wearer turns his or her face so that the colour catches the light.

natural light
l to r :: attrape coeur, mac seedy pearl :: natural light
the third shade is the brightest of the bunch, although it's not exactly neon. it's an orchid pink-purple shade with a soft periwinkle blue reflect. it's a very modern shade and it certainly put me in mind of the more exotic flowers growing in a hot house, waiting to be brought to the outside. there are two cult shades that have the same kind of effect: mac's "stars 'n' rockets", which is brighter and pinker and urban decay's "asphyxia" which is more purple/ blue. honestly, all three are stunning shades and i couldn't pick between them. guerlain's is probably the most understated, but it still gives a nice lift of colour.

natural light
l to r :: mac stars & rockets, attrape-coeur, urban decay asphyxia :: natural light
finally, we have a dark amethyst purple. it's not blackened like the deeper shade of hourglass' exhibition duo, but it's definitely dark enough to stand out against the other shades in the palette. it's a true purple and looks purple on the eye- unlike a lot of darker colours that tend to look like a soft, smudgy black. it's a perfect compliment to a light, spring-toned eye, in that it gives definition and depth, but isn't overly stark.

it's a colour powerhouse, too; ultra-smooth, pigmented, long-wearing... i could go on.

mac's limited edition mega-metal shade "noir plum" is a lot more blue. mac "nocturnelle" is redder and took less shimmery. although i like both of those shades, neither came close to matching guerlain in terms of pigment and smoothness of application.

natural light
l to r :: mac noir plum [l.e.], attrape-coeur, mac nocturnelle :: natural light
the wear time on guerlain shades without noticeable fading is generally very good and the last few days, i've been away at a business meeting and forgot to bring an eye primer. i could have rushed out to get one, of course, but i thought i'd try these out against my natural lid. i'm pleased to say that they stood up extremely well to 8+ hours of wear on their own, with minimal fading and no creasing at all. on my lids, that's remarkable.

of course, once my heart was trapped, i couldn't resist checking out the shades of lipstick available with the spring collection. there are two new rouge automatique shades and two new rouge automatique shines. the difference is that the "shine" shades are a little sheerer [i'd call them semi-opaque] and have shimmer that really seems to catch the light. for round one, i somehow got tempted by the collection's softest, subtlest shade, the rouge automatique shine in "rendez-vous".

it's a heathery pink-mauve and it's the kind of shade that i've been looking for a long time. why? because sometimes i want something that's subtle and "my lips but better" and 90% of the time, that means "my lips but warmer or lighter". my actual lip colour is cooler and quite mauve, whereas most natural shades look warm. this one is a really nice complement, blends in well with either a natural look or a smoky eye [or with the shades from attrape-coeur].

the one flaw the shade has is that it's really not long-lasting. soft shades generally aren't, but the sheerer formula of this one causes it to disappear generally within two to three hours, even under good conditions [normal humidity levels and lips in good shape]. for a luxury product, it's a bit on the short side, even when compared to similar shades. [nars "mayflower", for instance, lasts longer on me and has a similar level of opacity.]

rendez-vous :: natural light

i did not find the shimmer in this shade as pronounced as in "lou-ling" from the holiday collection [the only other rouge automatique shine i've bought], but it's definitely there, giving the lips a little added oomph [and making them appear a little fuller].

ooh-la-la
rouge d'armani 605 is somewhat similar, but more opaque and warmer. i find that the shade looks pinker in my swatch photos than it does in real life. the photos below, where you can see it on my lips, are more accurate to my eye.

l to r :: rendez vous, armani 605 :: natural light

these photos feature both the reviewed products- as you can probably tell just by glancing at them. they do work extremely well together and are a perfect pairing for spring [or, appropriately enough, for valentine's day]. here's a complete list of what was used.



the base ::
gosh velvet touch primer
mac paint pot "painterly"
clarins everlasting foundation "103"
diorskin nude hydrating concealer "001"
bobbi brown highlight powder "porcelain pearl"*

the eyes ::
guerlain e/s palette "attrape coeur" [frosty cool white, dirty lavender, cool pink-lilac, amethyst purple]*
stila sparkle liquid liner "spectrum" [black with multi-colour shimmer]
yves st. laurent effet faux cils mascara

the cheeks ::
mac blush ombre "azalea blossom"*

lips ::
guerlain rouge automatique shine l/s "rendez-vous" [semi-sheer mauve pink]

*suggested alternates :: azalea blossom = nars gaiety; attrape coeur and porcelain pearl are still available, since they are part of spring 2013 collections!

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

fun-raising

no, i am not dead, nor have i been lying incapacitated in a ditch somewhere. i've mostly been preparing for our imminent, epic move, which is actually not so terribly epic, because we found a place quite close to where we are now. in addition, i've been the beneficiary of an inordinately large amount of paying work, which does, sadly, take precedence over blogging, even though you know i'd always rather be with you.

indeed, with moving expenses and medical expenses looming on the horizon, more than can be accounted for even with the deepest cuts in the lipstick budget, dom and i recently did something that we've not done before: we asked for help. last week, we launched a fundraising campaign on go fund me. it can be difficult to admit that you need a helping hand, but what's been overwhelming for both of us is how quick to respond so many people we know have been once we asked. it's also shocking to see how quickly things added up.

most of all, though, the ex…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …