Skip to main content

making faces :: how dry i am

it is happening again. whether it's a wet cold or a dry cold, you can pretty much rest assured that if you're in the upper part of the northern hemisphere, you're going to be spending the next several months having the moisture vacuumed out of every section of your epidermis, especially those that you routinely expose to the world at large.

for most of us, that means our face and hands.

one of the things that i have never quite figured out is how both wet and dry colds somehow leave my lips feeling equally parched. i grew up in eastern canada, where the winters are wet enough that you'd assume the entire population would look like distorted sponges by the end of the cold season, but that's not the case. instead, a soggy winter leaves you in pretty much the same condition as the brittle winds of the prairies. [yes, i know that winds technically can't be brittle, but i thought that the phrase was evocative. it's my blog and i will sin against grammar at will.]

i think that a great deal of the problem comes from the fact that we actually spend far more time indoors, around electric heating, which makes the air even drier. i've already noticed the difference since i've been working full-time in an office that isn't in my home. that still, lifeless air takes a toll that's at least as bad as what's outside. [on a side note, i'm not sure who decided that office windows should never be allowed to open, because it seems that a lot of the problems people have with workplace air would be addressed by letting some fresh air in.]

if you are, like me, a lady who loves her lipstick, this time of year can get a little challenging. after all, the diminished light and moody skies are perfect for sultry, deep colours, but a lot of the most saturated formulas can feel like you're applying a combination of salt and hydrogen peroxide.

but i'm here to help.



since i try out lots of different lip products and work in an especially dry office, i've had a lot of opportunities to figure out what works and what doesn't. my lips are not exceptionally dry under normal circumstances, but they do tend to dry out fairly quickly when the weather changes and when i'm in a dry controlled climate for an extended period. so if you want to sport those autumnal hues, but not if they make you suffer, here are a few formulas you might want to check out:

guerlain :: rouge g and rouge automatique :: these really do seem to care for lips and pamper them with rich, hydrating hugs. both formulas are generally pretty pigmented to begin with and they hold their colour fairly well, throughout the day. remove them at night and they leave lips feeling good.

armani :: rouge d'armani :: i found that these were tops in maintaining their colour and, while they weren't quite as moisturising as guerlain, they're pretty damn comfortable. i love the fact that even their lighter colours last a long time.

bite :: luminous creme :: an upstart canadian company that i'll be reviewing in detail later this week, bite are completely focused on the lips. their colours are super-saturated, but do fade to a stain within a couple of hours. the stain, however, is generally very even and hangs on a long time. they feel lovely on the lips and are one of the very few formulas that actually seem hyrdating- my lips feel better after i've worn them.

nars :: semi-sheer and semi-matte lipsticks :: both of these formulas are really nice on the lips, even if the lips aren't feeling that nice to begin with. the semi-sheer shades obviously have less coverage, but it does last fairly well compared to others in the same category. their semi-matte shades are surprisingly forgiving on lips and probably the easiest matte formula to wear without aggravating already chapped or cracked lips.

and here are a few formulas you might want to keep on the shelf until milder, moister temperatures return:

chanel :: rouge allure velvet :: don't get me wrong, i love how pigmented and smooth these lipsticks are, but there's no getting around the fact that they're on the dry side. you can combat that by applying lip balm or a base, but if you want to keep things simple, it's probably wisest to look elsewhere.

mac :: cremesheen :: i never understood the hype around this particular formula, which has never struck me as one of mac's best. it's supposed to combine the rich colour of their amplified finish with the glossy shine of their lustres, but the fact is that many of their lustres are plenty pigmented and lipsticks don't tend to keep their shine that long no matter what. i find these are tricky to apply evenly if your lips are at all dry and that they tend to make that dryness a little worse. they are also very prone to feathering on dried lips.

makeup forever :: rouge artiste intense :: i should say that i haven't tried one of their satin finishes and i understand that these feel a little better, but the matte and frost shades in their range, while they have some amazing colours, are dry, there's no getting around it.

it always helps to apply a moisturising balm in the morning to help soften your lips and seal in moisture- just pat it dry or kiss the back of your hand before you apply your lipstick. there are also several lip primers that help lipstick glide on smoothly, last longer and stay inside the lines, although they generally won't moisturise your parched kisser- just make it look nicer. [moment of honesty- i remain to be convinced about the efficacy of these sorts of treatments, but if you find they work for you, feel free to speak up.]

so take heart. yes, the drying season is upon us, but there are places you can turn to get that distinctive dark pout without putting yourself in pain. [and, as always, please feel free to share your experiences and preferences!]

Comments

I am in love with Fyrinnae's lip lustres! They apply incredibly creamy and I rarely have to reapply throughout the day.
Kate MacDonald said…
I've heard so many good things about Fyrrinae, I really must try them. I have one of their loose pigments which is incredibly beautiful, but somehow I've never gotten around to ordering from them.

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …