Skip to main content

spam of the week :: writers' strike?

i got three spam messages this week that looked like this:


EFE7B636A4C38FAADA2C74FFF3F431C4B9EB9D5EA94A30C8AE275F799DD2E12870AFA9A5011D0E7BB39CDB312A15EB45C9BB9876


that's it. well, there's a web site link, but that really doesn't interest me. 


i'd like to think that there's a code, but i sort of doubt it. so it looks to me like spammers are just getting extremely lazy, since they can't even be bothered to make up some hilariously misspelled text about how they were the business partner of some crazy deposed dead tyrant and need me to babysit their gold bullion for a while. but then i noticed...


all the codes in the different spam messages are different. completely different. why would anyone bother with that? do they think that there are people who are going to be fooled into following the link because they haven't yet received that specific code of letters and numbers? "well the first five i knew were ridiculous, but then i saw numbers that almost matched my birthday on line three and i figured this one was special."


or perhaps they're doing all these different combinations to be mysterious. like they suddenly want to seem all serious now that we've figured out that they aren't the crown prince of nigeria. maybe they think that if they send something strange and inscrutable that we'll stop posting these messages and making fun of them, in which case, they need to be told that no one gets mocked as viciously as people who are difficult to understand. 


but in the interests of having fun, here's my pre-crafted equally-spammy response:


comrade,
thank you for your message. understand that we cannot stop the mission at this time. we will take measures to try to ensure your safety, but you must always be ready to take ultimate responsibility.  watch your local newspapers tomorrow for crucial developments
you may find what you are looking for in your car. no further communication can take place through this channel. certain elements may have already been compromised.
to the greater glory! w.a.s.t.e. 

i figure that if there is anything even resembling a human being involved in this process, that should be enough to make them a little paranoid. at the very least, it should get their creative juices flowing again.

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …