Skip to main content

making faces :: quick change

i knew this would happen. as soon as i started a new job, i was certain that i was going to have to find a way to get myself to work, home from work and out to the caustic lounge in very short order, because there wouldn't be a lot of extra minutes, particularly since i also knew that i'd forget to organise everything for my set the first time.

and, lo, it came to pass. 

this isn't an uncommon problem, of course. we all have times when we want to quickly change from our daytime face to something appropriate for a night out. so when i got up in the morning, i forced myself to think of what to do to ensure that i could make the transition without relying on a magic phone booth. 

the idea for the daytime was to keep everything as minimal and neutral as possible [although, clearly, i was still planning on wearing makeup], so that it could be built-up later on without requiring a cleaning of the facial slate to start from scratch. 

to that end, i stuck to very soft, mostly matte colours that were close to the ones in my natural complexion, but that lent an overall brightness that made me look a little more awake than i normally would. i've listed what i used below, but honestly, you'd want to find something that was close to your own colouring. in my case, i picked a light, slightly peachy base colour and a mauve-taupe shade in my crease and along my lower lash line, in order to give some definition and accentuate the shape of my eyes a little. i went very light on the mascara [for me] and used a softer formula, so that it wouldn't clump up when i added to it later. [not having to remove and reapply mascara is probably the biggest key to saving time here]. 

i used a mac beauty powder on my cheeks, because i just love how the finish is nearly matte, but with a bit of a glow. i'm all in favour of products that make me look like i have a much healthier and more wholesome lifestyle than i really do. 

and for my lips, i donned nars' "mayflower", one of my go-to shades when i'm looking for that "my lips but better" kind of effect. it's interesting, because this shade is a bit warmer than my natural lip colour, which is a cool mauve-pink shade, so it tends to look more natural than when i wear no lipstick at all. 

now, to switch this into a good nighttime look, the idea was to keep most of the elements similar, with one striking difference. i darkened the outer corners of my eyes and applied a shimmery shade to the lids, so that there was a bit more drama going on, but i kept the shades very neutral. as i mentioned, i added a coat of a heavier, darker mascara and some black liner along my upper lash line. 

i kept the soft colour on my cheeks, but i did add a bit of tan-coloured blush to make my cheekbones stand out a little more. again, no huge changes, just augmenting the very simple look i already had going. 

the big change, of course, was in the lip colour. bolder, deeper, more noticeable lips go so well with neutrals and, of course, it takes no time at all to change this. but it gives the whole look a very different effect. i also used a very sparkly shade for this, so that unlike the daytime face, which was mostly matte and satin textures, there were lots of things that could catch the light in the evening. 

total switchover time was just over five minutes, leaving me those precious moments i needed to get some music together so that i could do a reasonable dj impersonation at the caustic lounge. [you can read about that here.]


anyway, here are the details on what i ended up doing...

the base ::
marcelle beauty balm "light/ medium"
lush colour supplement "jackie oates" [night only]
smashbox high definition liquid concealer "fair/ light"
marcelle pressed powder "translucent"

the daytime eyes ::
inglot e/s "352" [peach-cream]
mac e/s "velour"* [brown-mauve]
nars e/s "mekong" [espresso brown with gold shimmer- used along the upper lash line]
makeup forever concealer pencil "light" [used as a liner to brighten the eyes]
smashbox full exposure mascara

the daytime cheeks ::
mac beauty powder blush "her own devices"* [light natural pink]

the daytime lips ::
nars l/s "mayflower" [sheer warm pink]

and into the night...

the nighttime eyes ::

inglot e/s "352"
mac e/s "velour"
[those two were left untouched, i just added to them]
rouge bunny rouge e/s "angelic cockatiels" [shimmery amber-honey]
mac e/s "vainglorious"* [maroon-plum]
nars e/s "mekong"
mac e/s "dazzlelight" [shimmery neutral highlight]
mac powerpoint liner "black swan" [black with silver shimmer]
armani eyes to kill excess mascara

the nighttime cheeks ::
mac beauty powder "her own devices"*
mac blush ombre "springshine"* [neutral tan]

the nighttime lips ::
bobbi brown hi-shimmer lip gloss "black ruby" [sparkly metallic red]

*suggested alternates :: velour = mac quarry [greyer,but close]; her own devices = mac tenderling [pinker, more pigmented]; vainglorious = mac star violet [more purple]; springshine = benefit hoola

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

don't speak

you might think that it sounds dramatic, but linguistic genocide is something that happens. people in power will go to great lengths to eradicate certain languages, not just for the sheer joy of making the world a lesser place, but as a way of beating down the culture that's associated with it. language has a unique reciprocal bond with culture, and every group that has attempted to break down another has recognised that forbidding a cultural group from communicating in their own language is an extremely effective way to tear apart their culture.

there are lots [and lots and lots and lots] of examples of this sort of thing, some successful, some not, but far too many to cover in one blog post. however, i thought it was worth looking at some languages that have been the subjects of active repression, and what the political consequences of that have been.

devastation :: the native north american languages :: it should come as no surprise that the largest genocide in history [by a ma…

long division

after the united states election last year, there were the usual calls for the country to unite behind the new president. that never happens anymore, because, since george w. bush scored a victory in 2004, having launched the country into a war in iraq for no reason, the people on the losing side of a presidential election have been pretty bloody angry about it. democrats hated bush 43. republicans really hated obama. democrats really hate trump.

it didn't help that trump didn't make the typical conciliatory gestures like including a couple of members of the opposite party in his cabinet, or encouraging his party to proceed slowly with contentious legislation. barack obama arguably wasted at least two and as many as six years of his tenure as president trying to play peacemaker before he felt sufficiently safe to just say "screw you guys" and start governing around the ridiculous congress he was forced to deal with. not-giving-a-shit obama was the best president in …

losers?

just a short time ago, i waxed prosaic about trump supporters who felt betrayed by their candidate pursuing in office the exact things that he said he would. short version: i have no sympathy.

today is a bit different. in the wake of america's bombing of a syrian air strip, in response to a chemical weapons attack by the syrian government, my facebook and twitter feeds were peppered with plaintive shades of "we believed you". these are the people who heard trump say that he wanted the united states to step back and focus on defending its own. indeed, trump did say such things, over and over; america cannot be the policeman of the world. even arch-liberal cynics like me had to admit that this was a refreshing argument to hear from someone outside the paul family, and, could easily have been turned into trump's greatest argument against hillary clinton. [he chose to go another way, which also worked.]

trump also said, repeatedly, that america needed to invest heavily …