Skip to main content

making faces :: are you a scrumptiously devious kind of lady?

*smooch*
i'm not exactly sure when lipstick names finally jumped the track and headed into the forest. as with most things in the contemporary cosmetic arts, i think it started from mac cosmetics. when i first started buying lipsticks, i had ones with names like "blackberry" and "merlot". on the more fanciful side was something like "cherries in the snow", which still called to mind an icy cool pink-red, which is exactly what the colour was [and still is]. then i discovered mac and got colours like "jet" or "grid" or "media". not exactly evocative of a particular sort of shade. from there, all bets were off. now, you're lucky if anyone ever tethers their cosmetic colour names to something real.


so when you hear the name "scrumptiously devious", you might not immediately have a shade in mind. 


this is one of rouge bunny rouge's "hues of enchantment" range- their fuller-finish lipsticks [as opposed to the sheerer "succulence of dew" range]. they describe it as "cool lavender pink with a golden opalescence. inspired by the colours of pomegranate skin". 


natural light
i'd agree with the first half of the description- how they interpret the inspiration is really their business. but i'd say that rather than a cooler pink base, it's more neutral. it really looks cool only in a certain light. the refined golden shimmer makes the overall shade warmer-toned, like most rbr lipsticks. it's a gorgeous, natural but striking kind of shade that made my lips look very smooth- a remarkable feat for a frost finish. i've learned with rbr that the differences in wear time between their lipsticks have more to do with the finish than the formula. frosted shades like dark juices [part of the "succulence of dew" range] and scrumptiously devious last longer than creamier shades in either formula like word of mouth or murmurings. the coverage is pretty much opaque on this colour. 






with flash
there are a lot of light pink shades with varying degrees of shimmer, so whether or not you want to plunk down $30-ish [depending on the exchange rate] for this one will depend on what you have already and what you're looking for. in terms of similar colours, nars "pago pago" is lighter and the shimmer is cooler. nars "mayflower" is pinker and brighter. the feel and wear of the shade actually reminded me a lot of guerlain's "cherry blossom", my favourite light pink shade ever, but they're not really similar in terms of colour. "cherry blossom" is brighter, pinker and has a silvery white shimmer that gives it an overall cool appearance. i guess they're kind of cousins from different sides of the warm-cool spectrum. mac "viva glam v" is the most similar colour that i own. the base shades are very similar, but "viva glam v" is a touch sheerer and the shimmer is lighter, so the colour looks quite a bit lighter on the lips.


l to r :: nars pago pago, nars mayflower, rbr scrumptiously devious, guerlain cherry blossom, mac viva glam v



for me, this is an absolutely perfect shade. it works day or night and leaves my lips feeling wonderful. it's a shade that i think pretty much anyone could wear, which is why it's probably described as a "bestseller" by rouge bunny rouge themselves. a great light-natural pink shade brightens your whole face and this one definitely falls into that category. even someone like me, who doesn't repeat lipsticks a lot from day to day is going to find a lot of times to use this. so yes, it's currently in heavy rotation on my face. it may not be one of the dramatic reds or berries that i love, but it's so easy to wear with anything and at the same time has a glimmer of quiet sophistication that it doesn't need to call attention to itself.


like all rouge bunny rouge products, it's available from www.zuneta.com


here's a look at how i used it the first time out [along with a couple of other things i'll be reviewing shortly, in case you were curious...]



the base ::
marcelle beauty balm "light/ medium"
clarins everlasting foundation "103"
smashbox high definition liquid concealer "fair/ light"

marcelle pressed powder "translucent"


the eyes ::
inglot e/s "352" [matte white-peach]
edward bess e/s "storm" [whisper grey-mauve]
le metier de beaute e/s "corinthian" [plum-taupe]
mac powerpoint eye liner "black swan" [black with silver shimmer]
guerlain eye kohl "black"
armani eyes to kill excess mascara


the cheeks ::
guerlain blush g* [bright coral-pink]


lips ::
rouge bunny rouge l/s "scrumptiously devious" [cool-neutral pink with gold shimmer]


*suggested alternates :: rouge g = benefit bella bamba [more shimmer]

Comments

as long as you're here, why not read more?

i'm definitely someone altogether different

about a hundred years ago, i remember having a partner who told me that, rather than writing the sort of ambiance-oriented crap [he didn't say crap, i'm saying it] that i was naturally driven to write, i should just compose something like the harry potter books. this wasn't out of any sense of challenging me to do new things but because of the desperate hope that my love of writing could be parlayed into something profitable.

my reaction at the time was "i just can't". and that was honestly how i felt because i didn't believe that that kind of story was in me. for the record, i still don't think that anything like the potter-hogwarts universe is in me. i'm not a fan of fantasy literature generally speaking and i feel like there's a richer experience to be examined in looking at our experience as regular humans being part of the rational, limited, everyday world and at the same time being able to feel connected to something that, for lack of a…

making faces :: a lip for all seasons [winter edition]

it seems oddly canadian to have two posts in a row about winter/ cold/ snow, but they're obviously unrelated. after all, for most people winter is a season, but in colour analysis terms, winter is part of what you are, an effect of the different wavelengths that comprise the physical part of the thing known as "you". this might be getting a little heady for a post about lipstick. moving on...

if you've perused the other entries in this series without finding something that really spoke to you [figuratively- lipsticks shouldn't actually speak to you- get help], you may belong in one of the winter seasons. winter, like summer, is cool in tone; like spring, it is saturated; like autumn, it is dark. that combination of elements creates a colour palette [or three] that reads as very "strong" to most. and on people who aren't part of the winter group, such a palette would look severe. the point of finding a palette that reads "correctly" on you…

making faces :: best [bright winter] face forward

a few years ago, i wrote quite a bit about sci/art colour analysis. i haven't followed up on it more recently because there's only so much a girl can say about three-dimensional colour and what the "hallmarks" of each loose category are without getting super repetitive. i am planning on updating a few of the posts that i made, particularly the "lip for all seasons" posts [springsummer, autumn, winter], as those are out of date and not so useful. the posts on colour analysis continue to be very popular despite being years old, so i figure it's worth following up.

during my journey of colour self-discovery, i determined that i was probably a bright winter, which means i look best in colours that are highly saturated first of all [and sharply contrasting second of all], and which lean cooler and darker. not for me the soft smoky eyes and muted lips, nor the bubbly, light-as-air pastels. as i proved to myself wearing different looks, trying to embrace th…